Chapter published in:
Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 191224


Acquaviva, P.
(2008) Lexical plurals. A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, K.
(1980) Nouns and countability. Language, 56, 541–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N.
(1993) Reference to abstract objects in discourse: A philosophical semantics for natural language metaphysics. Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T., & Bond, F.
(2003) Learning the countability of English nouns from corpus data. In Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (vol. 1). Association for Computational Linguistics. Crossref
Bale, A., & Barner, D.
(2009) The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26, 217–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., Guevara, E., & Zamparelli, R.
(2009) The dual nature of deverbal nominal constructions: Evidence from acceptability ratings and corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 27–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J., & Perry, J.
(1983) Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MASS.: MIT press.Google Scholar
Borer, H.
(2005) Structuring sense: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F.
(2014) Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G.
(1977)  Reference to kinds in English (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Cheng, C.-Y.
(1973) Response to Moravcsik. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravczik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language (pp. 286–288). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R.
(1999) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(2010) Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53–104). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1967) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
(Ed.) (2002) Functional structure in DP and IP – the Carthography of Syntactic Structures (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rosa, P., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F.
(2010) Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, M.
(1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doetjes, J.
(1996) Mass and count: Syntax or semantics. In Meaning on the HIL. Occasional Papers in Linguistics. HIL/Leiden University.Google Scholar
Falco, M., & Zamparelli, R.
(2019) Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, (4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E., Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2008) Introducing and evaluating ukWaC, a very large web-derived corpus of English. Proceedings of the 4th Web as Corpus Workshop WAC4 . http://​repository​.dlsi​.ua​.es​/251​/1​/workshops​/W19%7B%5C​_%7DProceedings​.pdf#page​=53
Gerstner, C., & Krifka, M.
(1987) Genericity, an introduction. Manuscript, Universitat Tubingen.
Gillon, B.
(1992) Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 597–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guarino, N., & Welty, C.
(2000) A formal ontology of properties. In R. Dieng (Ed.), Proceedings of 12th international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterwimmer, S., & Umbach, C.
(2015) Grading and hedging by gewiss . In L. Alonso-Ovalle & P. Menendez-Benito (Eds.), Epistemic indefinites (pp. 163–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jayez, J., & Tovena, L. M.
(2002) Determiners and (un)certainty. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) xii. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1954) A modern English grammar on historical principles (Vol. Part II). London: George Allen; Unwin.Google Scholar
Katz, G., & Zamparelli, R.
(2012) Quantifying count/mass elasticity. In J. C. at alii (Ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 29. Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kiss, T., Husic, H., & Pelletier, F. J.
(2014) The Bochum English Countability Lexicon, distribution 2.0. University of Bochum Distribution notes for the BECL 2.0 release.
Kiss, T., Pelletier, F. J., & Stadtfeld, T.
(2014a) Building a reference lexicon for countability in English. Proceedings of LREC , Reykjavik, Iceland.
(2014b) Building a reference lexicon for countability in English. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. De- clerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC14). Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Landman, F.
(2010) Count nouns – mass nouns, neat nouns – mess nouns. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, J.
(1973) Studies in English generics. University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, 1(1).Google Scholar
Levinson, J.
(1978) Properties and related entities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 39, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Link, G.
(1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language (pp. 302–323). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M.
(2011) Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M.
(2015) Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3), 485–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J.
(1979) Lexicography and the count-mass distinction. In Adverbs, vowels, and other objects of wonder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., & Ramscar, M.
(2001) Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context on judgements of semantic similarity. Proceedings of Cognitive Science, 611–616.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2002) A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive [reprinted from the 1891 edition]. Honolulu, HI: University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
Moltmann, F.
(1997) Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Part structures, integrity, and the mass-count distinction. Synthese, 116, 75–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Properties and kinds of tropes: New linguistic facts and old philosophical insights. Mind, 113(449). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Plural reference and reference to a plurality. Linguistic facts and semantic analyses. In M. Carrara, A. Arapinis, & F. Moltmann (Eds.), Unity and plurality. Logic, philosophy, and semantics (pp. 93–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, D.
(2002) Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class? Kansas working papers in linguistics. Crossref
(2004) The semantics of nouns derived from gradable adjectives. In C. Meier & M. Weisgerber (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference “SUB8 – Sinn und Bedeutung” , Universitat Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar
(2008) Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 211–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ojeda, A.
(2005) The paradox of mass plurals. In S. Mufwene et al. (Ed.), Polymorphous linguistics. Jim McCawley’s legacy (pp. 389–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T.
(1990) Events in the semantics of English. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pelletier, F. J., & Schubert, L. K.
(1989) Mass expressions. In D. Gabbay & F. Günthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (pp. 327–407). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I.
(1999) Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.
(1960) Word and object. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1972) A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Renzi, L.
(1995) L’articolo. In L. Renzi, G. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
(2010) Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sassoon, G. W.
(2008)  Vagueness, gradability and typicality: A comprehensive semantic analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Tel Aviv University.
Schwarzschild, R. S.
(1996) Pluralities (Vol. 61). Dordrecht London: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tovena, L. M.
(2001) Between mass and count. In K. Megerdoomian, & L. Bar-el (Eds.), WCCFL 20 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, D.
(1995) Le spectre nominal. Lille: Peeters.Google Scholar
Yi, B.-U.
(2015) Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language, by Friederike Moltmann. Mind, 124(495), 958–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, R.
(2008) On the interpretability of ϕ-features. In C. De Cat, & K. Demuth (Eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection: A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Espunya, Anna
2020. Reduced abstractness in Spanish-English translation: the case of property-denoting nouns. Meta: Journal des traducteurs 65:2  pp. 440 ff. Crossref logo
Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli
2019. Partitives and Partitivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.