Cover not available
Part of
Individual Differences in Anaphora Resolution: Language and cognitive effects
Edited by Georgia Fotiadou and Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 18] 2023
► pp. 68–93

On the interaction of age, cognitive abilities, print exposure and pronoun type in pronoun resolution

 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki | University of Cambridge
Our study examines the impact of age differences in the interpretation of null and overt subject pronouns in referentially ambiguous sentences, while investigating at the same time the extent to which ambiguous anaphora resolution is affected by cognitive and print exposure measures. Older adults (n = 46) and younger adults (n = 62) were administered an online self-paced listening referent-choice task and a battery of cognitive measures including digit span, visual attention switching, as well as a print exposure. Pronoun resolution was found to be subject to age differences, however, the two pronouns were not equally affected. Referent preference radically changed with age for the null pronoun contexts only, while overt pronoun resolution patterns were similar across the two age groups. The groups’ performance is accounted for in terms of both age-related cognitive decline and the pronouns’ degree of morphophonological specification.
Keywords: ambiguous pronouns, null, overt, Greek, aging, executive functions, print exposure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The present study
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Experimental tasks
      • 3.2.1Anaphora resolution task
      • 3.2.2Individual differences tasks
        • 3.2.2.1Print exposure task
      • 3.2.3Cognitive tasks
        • 3.2.3.1Working memory
        • 3.2.3.2Global-local task
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Analysis plan
    • 4.2Correlation analyses among age, WM, cognitive skill and print exposure measures
    • 4.3Anaphora resolution task
      • 4.3.1Referent preference rates
      • 4.3.2Response times
      • 4.3.3On-line listening times
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 2 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.18.03per
References (62)
References
Ackerman, P. L., & Rolfhus, E. L. (1999). The locus of adult intelligence: Knowledge, abilities, and non-ability traits. Psychology and Aging, 14, 314–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alloway, T. P. (2007). Automated Working Memory Assessment. London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2002). Null vs. Overt Pronouns and the Topic-Focus Articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 14, 151–169.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Carminati, M. (2002). The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 124–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, G. C., & Smyth, R. (1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: a test of Centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 593–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 143–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colonna, S., Schimke, S., & Hemforth, B. (2012). Information structure effects on anaphora resolution in German and French: A cross-linguistic study of pronoun resolution. Linguistics, 55, 991–1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawley, R., Stevenson, R., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeDe, G. (2014). Sentence comprehension in older adults: evidence for risky processing strategies. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 436–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitriadis, A. (1996). When pro-drop language don’t: overt pronominal subjects and pragrmatic inference. In L. M. Dobrin., K. Singer, & L. McNair (Eds), CLS 32: Papers from the Main Session (pp. 33–47). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Aging in context: age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filiaci, F. (2010). Null and overt subject biases in Spanish and Italian: a cross-linguistic comparison. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium (pp. 171–182). Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA.Google Scholar
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 357–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fotiadou, G., Fleva, E., Katsiperi, M., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2015). Ψυχογλωσσολογικές Μετρήσεις του Γραπτού Λόγου: Επίπεδα Εξοικείωσης και Λεξική Αναγνώριση. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 35, 566–578.Google Scholar
Fountoulakis, C., Tsolaki, M., Chantzi, H., & Kazis, A. (2000). Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE): A validation study in demented patients from the elderly Greek population. American Journal of Alzheimer Disease, 15, 342–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghaleh, M. (2015). Discourse processing abilities in aging: influence of working memory capacity on reference resolution. PhD dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, P., Koster, C., & Hoeks, J. (2014). Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(4), 391–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J., VanPatten, B., & Keating, G. D. (2011). Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 33(2), 193–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kail, M., Diakogiorgi, K. (1994). Morphology and Word Order in the Processing of Greek Sentences: a Cross-linguistic and Developmental Perspective. In Philippaki-Warbuton, I., Nicolaidis, K., & Sifianou, M. (Eds), Themes in Greek Linguistics, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (pp. 325–333). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, E. (2011). Focusing on Pronouns: Consequences of Subjecthood, Pronominalisation and Contrastive Focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (10), 1625–1666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D., VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J. (2011). Who was walking on the beach? Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 193–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., & Krashen, S. (1998). The Author Recognition and Magazine Recognition Tests and Free Voluntary Reading as predictors of vocabulary development in English as a Foreign Language. System, 26, 515–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Light, L. L., & Capps, J. L. (1986). Comprehension of pronouns in younger and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 22, 580–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manly, J. J., Byrd, D. A., Touradji, P., & Stern, Y. (2004). Acculturation, reading level, and neuropsychological test performance among African American elders. Applied Neuropsychology, 11(1), 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T. (2008) On-line processing of sentences involving reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns in L1 and L2 children. In Gavarro, A., & Freitas, M. J. (Eds), Language acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 348–358). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Martin, N. W., Hansell, N. K., Wainwright, M. A., Shekar, S. N., Medland, S. E., Bates, T. C., & Wright, M. J. (2009). Genetic covariation between the Author Recognition Test and reading and verbal abilities: What can we learn from the analysis of high performance? Behavior Genetics, 39, 417–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayol, L., & Clark, R. (2010). Pronouns in Catalan: Games of partial information and the use of linguistic resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 781–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67-91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miltsakaki, E. (2007). A rethink of the relationship between salience and anaphora resolution. In Branco, A., McEnery, T., Mitkov, R., & Silva, F. (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2007) (pp. 91–96). Centro de Linguística de Universidade do Porto, Porto.Google Scholar
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myerson. J., Hale, S., Wagstaff, D., Poon, L. W., & Smith, G. A. (1990). The information-loss model: A mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. Psychological Review, 97, 475–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navon, D. (1977). Forest Before Trees: The Precedence of Global Features in Visual Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., & van Berkum, J. (2006). The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language, 106(2), 119–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O' Brien, E. J., Plewes, P. S., & Albrecht, J. E. (1990). Antecedent retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 241–249.Google Scholar
Ostrosky-Solís, F. (2004). Can literacy change brain anatomy? International Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., Peristeri E., Plemenou E., Marinis T., Tsimpli I. (2015). Pronoun ambiguity resolution in Greek: Evidence from monolingual adults and children. Lingua, 155, 98–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles J. L., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., & Gaines, C. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 621–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficacy and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19 (1-2), 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qiu, L., Swaab, T. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, S. (2012). The Role of Gender Information in Pronoun Resolution: Evidence from Chinese. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e36156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosemary, S. J., Nelson, A. W. R., & Stenning, K. (1995). The role of parallelism in strategies of pronoun comprehension. Language and Speech, 38(4), 393–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. (2012). A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Quantity and Quality of Child-Directed Speech in Vocabulary Development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2, 179–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1994). The course of adult intellectual development. American Psychologist, 49, 304–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
Schooler C., & Mulatu, M. S. (2001). The reciprocal effects of leisure time activities and intellectual functioning in older people: A longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging, 16, 466–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
St Clair-Thompson, H. (2005). Working memory and its role in children's scholastic attainment. PhD dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Harrison, M. R. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31, 811–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. (2011). External interfaces and the notion of ‘default’. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 101–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., Gilley, D. W., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., & Evans, D. A. (2000). Premorbid reading activity and patterns of cognitive decline in Alzheimer Disease. Archives of Neurology, 57, 1718–1723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar