Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars

Editor
ORCID logo | The Pennsylvania State University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027208200 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027288011 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Google Play logo
The Minimalist Program has advanced a research program that builds the design of human language from conceptual necessity. Seminal proposals by Frampton & Gutmann (1999, 2000, 2002) introduced the notion that an ideal syntactic theory should be ‘crash-proof’. Such a version of the Minimalist Program (or any other linguistic theory) would not permit syntactic operations to produce structures that ‘crash’. There have, however, been some recent developments in Minimalism – especially those that approach linguistic theory from a biolinguistic perspective (cf. Chomsky 2005 et seq.) – that have called the pursuit of a ‘crash-proof grammar’ into serious question. The papers in this volume take on the daunting challenge of defining exactly what a ‘crash’ is and what a ‘crash-proof grammar’ would look like, and of investigating whether or not the pursuit of a ‘crash-proof grammar’ is biolinguistically appealing.
[Language Faculty and Beyond, 3] 2010.  xii, 301 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 15 September 2010
Table of Contents
“Mike Putnam has put together the perfect and most up to date gateway into the world of crash-proof syntax. Can syntactic derivations fail to produce viable structures of meaning and sound? This is a cutting-edge and radically open question of human language design, which affects both linguistic description and theory, within and beyond linguistic Minimalism. Whatever one’s answer to the question, the journey into this important territory should start from this book.”
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Harizanov, Boris
2019. Head movement to specifier positions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston
2019. Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, DOI logo
Ruys, E. G.
2015. A Minimalist Condition on Semantic Reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 46:3  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Epstein, Samuel David, Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely
2014. Labeling by Minimal Search: Implications for Successive- Cyclic A-Movement and the Conception of the Postulate ‘‘Phase’’. Linguistic Inquiry 45:3  pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Kosta, Peter & Diego Gabriel Krivochen
2014. Flavors of movement. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11],  pp. 236 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFK: Grammar, syntax

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2010018680 | Marc record