Article published in:
Exploring Crash-Proof GrammarsEdited by Michael T. Putnam
[Language Faculty and Beyond 3] 2010
► pp. 125–142
Uninterpretable features
What are they and what do they do?
This paper consists of four sections. Section 1 identifies an important unclarity regarding the central concept “crash” and suggests a way to rectify it. Section 2 reveals a pervasive empirical problem confronting Chomsky’s (2007, 2008) attractively deductive valuation-transfer analysis. Section 3 offers a possible solution to this problem, reanalyzing the relation between uninterpretable features and Transfer. Section 4 presents a possible modification of a crash-proof aspect of the proposed model and briefly discusses a remaining question.
Published online: 15 September 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.07eps
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.07eps
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Carstens, Vicki
Carstens, Vicki & Michael Diercks
Fernández Fuertes, Raquel, Esther Álvarez de la Fuente & Sonja Mujcinovic
Kramer, Ruth
Pires, Acrisio & Will Nediger
Progovac, Ljiljana
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.