Part of
Where Do Phonological Features Come From?: Cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categoriesEdited by G. Nick Clements and Rachid Ridouane
[Language Faculty and Beyond 6] 2011
► pp. 131–172
Edited by G. Nick Clements and Rachid Ridouane
[Language Faculty and Beyond 6] 2011
► pp. 131–172
Automaticity vs. feature-enhancement in the control of segmental F0
Several phonological oppositions are typically accompanied by F0 differences. F0 is higher following voiceless consonants than voiced; it is also higher for high than low vowels. Analysis of cricothyroid activity aimed to determine whether these F0 differences are automatic effects contingent on the basic articulatory manoeuvres required for the oppositions of voicing and vowel height, or whether the differences reflect active enhancement strategies. Results for both oppositions suggest a hybrid model: The articulatory contingency is at the heart of the F0 differences, but these differences may be reinforced by active laryngeal adjustments. Additional analysis focused on German tense vs. lax vowels. Higher cricothyroid activity in lax vowels could explain why these vowels do not follow typical intrinsic F0 patterns. Tentative support was found.
Cited by
Cited by 9 other publications
Brunner, Jana & Phil Hoole
2012. Motor Equivalent Strategies in the Production of German /∫/ under Perturbation. Language and Speech 55:4 ► pp. 457 ff. 
Clayards, Meghan
2017. Individual Talker and Token Covariation in the Production of Multiple Cues to Stop Voicing. Phonetica 75:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Dmitrieva, Olga & Indranil Dutta
2020. Acoustic Correlates of the Four-Way Laryngeal Contrast in Marathi. Phonetica 77:3 ► pp. 209 ff.
Dmitrieva, Olga, Fernando Llanos, Amanda A. Shultz & Alexander L. Francis
2015. Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics 49 ► pp. 77 ff.
Guo, Yuting & Harim Kwon
2022. Production and Perception of Mandarin Laryngeal Contrast: The Role of Post-plosive F0. Frontiers in Communication 7
Kirby, James & D. Robert Ladd
2018. Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel F0: Implications for laryngeal realism. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 4:1 ► pp. 213 ff.
Moisik, Scott R., Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins & John H. Esling
2021. Phonological potentials and the lower vocal tract. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 51:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Steffman, Jeremy
2023. Vowel-internal cues to vowel quality and prominence in speech perception. Phonetica 80:5 ► pp. 329 ff.
Wallet, Lucille
2023. Évaluation de la fréquence fondamentale intrinsèque après cordectomie laser de type II-III. Langages N° 232:4 ► pp. 107 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.