Article published in:Where Do Phonological Features Come From?: Cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categories
Edited by G. Nick Clements and Rachid Ridouane
[Language Faculty and Beyond 6] 2011
► pp. 197–236
Features as an emergent product of computing perceptual cues relative to expectations
Speech perception must ultimately contrast between discrete units of meaning, words, which are minimally distinguished by phonological features. While traditional approaches argued that discreteness is imposed by mechanisms like categorical perception that discard within-category detail, recent research suggests that fine-grained detail is preserved throughout processing. We develop an alternative that argues that discreteness emerges from processes that parse overlapping sources of variance from the signal. These need not discard acoustic detail and may make it more useful to listeners. We develop a computational implementation (Computing Cues Relative to Expectations, C-CuRE) and test it on a corpus of vowel productions. It shows how C-CuRE reveals underlying vowel features despite contextual variance, and simultaneously uses the variance to better predict upcoming vowels.
Published online: 28 July 2011
Cited by other publications
Apfelbaum, Keith S., Natasha Bullock-Rest, Ariane E. Rhone, Allard Jongman & Bob McMurray
Apfelbaum, Keith S. & Bob McMurray
Choi, William, Xiuli Tong & Leher Singh
Crinnion, Anne Marie, Beth Malmskog & Joseph C. Toscano
Farris-Trimble, Ashley W.
Kaufeld, Greta, Wibke Naumann, Antje S. Meyer, Hans Rutger Bosker & Andrea E. Martin
Llanos, Fernando & Alexander L Francis
Ringen, Catherine & Wim A. van Dommelen
Zhang, Jie & Hanbo Yan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.