Article published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp. 150172

Full-text

Are superordinates such as furniture and belongings collective nouns?
References

References

Acquaviva, P.
(2008) Lexical plurals : A morphosyntactic approach. Coll. Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arigne, V.
(2011) La figure du tout intégré et les noms discrets collectifs. Anglophonia 30, pp. 59–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bache, C.
(2002) On Categories in Linguistics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34, pp. 71–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(1998) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53–104). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.
(2006) Agreement. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present
Cruse, D. A.
(1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistic point of view. In P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 33–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dogget, R. M. et al.
(1980) Forecasts of the quantity and composition of solid waste. University of Michigan: Research Reporting Series.Google Scholar
Flaux, N.
(1999) A propos des noms collectifs. Revue de linguistique romane n°251–252, tome 63, pp. 471–502.Google Scholar
Flaux, N. & Van de Velde, D.
(2000) Les noms en français : esquisse de classement. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Gil, D.
(1996) Maltese “collective nouns”: A typological perspective. Rivista di Linguistica 8:1, pp. 53–87.Google Scholar
[ p. 172 ]
Greenbaum, S.
(1996) The Oxford English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1991) Parts and boundaries. In B. Levin, & S. Pinker (Eds.), Lexical and conceptual semantics (pp. 9–45). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2012) Language as a source of evidence for theories of spatial representation. Perception 41, pp. 1128–1152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joosten, F.
(2006) Why club and lingerie do not belong together. A plea for redefining collective nouns. In G. Kleiber et al. (Eds.), La relation partie-tout (pp. 73–88). Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
(2010) Collective nouns, aggregate nouns, and superordinates: when “part of” and “kind of” meet. Linguisticae Investigationes 33:1, pp. 25–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joosten, F. et al.
(2007) Dutch collective nouns and conceptual profiling. Linguistics 45:1, pp. 85–132. http://​eprints​.soton​.ac​.uk​/144837​/1​/Joosten,​_De​_Sutter,​_Drieghe​_et​_al​._(2007)​.pdf
Kirkby, J.
(1971 [1746]) A new English grammar. Menton: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Lammert, M.
(2010) Sémantique et cognition : les noms collectifs. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
(2014) Référence collective massive vs. référence plurielle indéfinie. Langue française 183, pp. 87–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Les pluralia tantum sous l’angle du collectif. Langue française 185, pp. 73–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M.
(1985) Why superordinate category terms can be mass nouns. Cognition 19, pp. 31–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L.
(2004 [2002]) The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, L.
(2010) Lexical meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English dictionary, online edition
(2014) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. Van Orman
(1960) Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Radden, G. & Dirven, R.
(2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reed, S. K.
(2012) Cognitive theories and applications, 9th edition. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(2003) Linguistic categorization, 3rd edition. Oxford textbooks in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. -J.
(2013) An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C.
(2007) A taxonomy of basic natural entities. In M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann and L. Vieu (eds.), The categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition (pp. 35–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1985) Oats and wheat: the fallacy of arbitrariness. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Typological Studies in Langage vol. 6: Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 311–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1988) The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 173 ]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Semantic Plurality [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 349], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.