Article published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp. 200227

Full-text

Résolution de l’ambiguïté sémantique des noms propres par utilisation des croyances sur les connaissances d’autrui – application au prénom
Références

Références

Andrews, P. B.
(1986) An introduction to mathematical logic and type theory: to truth through proof. Computer science and applied mathematics. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blin, R.
(2009) Introduction à la linguistique formelle. TIC et sciences cognitives. Paris : Hermès science publications – Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Bratman, M.
(1999) Intention, plans, and practical reason. David Hume series. Stanford, Calif: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
(2001) Essays on actions and events. 2nd edition. Oxford: New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C.
(1978) Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 568–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enjalbert, P.
(1996) De l’interprétation (sens, structures et processus). Intellectica, 23, 79–120.Google Scholar
Frege, G.
(1971) Ecrits logiques et philosophiques. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gosselin, L.
(1996) Le traitement de la polysémie contextuelle dans le calcul sémantique. Intellectica, 1(22), 93–117.Google Scholar
Jonasson, K.
(1994) Le nom propre: constructions et interprétations. Champs linguistiques. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & Reyle, U.
(1993) From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G.
(1981) Problèmes de référence : description définie et nom propre. Metz: Université de Metz, Center d’analyse syntaxique ; Paris: [diffusion] Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Kripke, S.
(1972) Naming and Necessity. In D. Davidson, & G. Harman (Eds.), Sementics of Natural Language (pp. 181–201). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, R. & de Mori, R.
(1990) A cache-base natural language model for speech recognition. In IEEE PAMI, volume 12, p. 570–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1978) Eléments de Sémantique. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
[ p. 227 ]
Norimatsu, H., Blin, R., Hashiya, K., Sorsana, C. & Kobayashi, H.
(2014) Understanding of others’ knowledge in French and Japanese children: a comparative study with a disambiguation task on 16–38-month-olds. Infant Behavior & Development, 37(4), 632–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papadimitriou, C. H., Tamaki, H., Raghavan, P. & Vempala, S.
(1998) Latent semantic indexing: a probabilistic analysis. p. 159–168: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G.
(1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pynadath, D. V. & Marsella, S. C.
(2005) Psychsim: Modeling theory of mind with decision-theoretic agents. In IJCAI, volume 5, p. 1181–1186.Google Scholar
Renaud, F.
(1996) The definite article: code and context. Journal of Semantics, 13(2), 139–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Temps, durativité, télicité. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Sabouret, N. & Belkaid, M.
(2014) Un modèle logique de théorie de l’esprit pour un agent virtuel dans le contexte de simulation d’entretien d’embauche. In Proc. Workshop Affect, Compagnon Artificiel, Interaction, Rouen.Google Scholar
Searle, J.
(1971) The problem of proper names. In D. D. Steinberg, & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics : An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psvchology. (pp. 135–141). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J.
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.[ p. 228 ]Google Scholar