Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 41:2 (2018) ► pp.224–239

Word frequency counts

Linking corpus data to user’s perception in linguistic research

| Adam Mickiewicz University

Lexical frequency is one of the major variables involved in language processing. It constitutes a cornerstone of psycholinguistic, corpus linguistic as well as applied research. Linguists take frequency counts from corpora and they started to take them for granted. However, voices emerge that corpora may not always provide a comprehensive picture of how frequently lexical items appear in a language. In the present contribution I compare corpus frequency counts for English and Polish words to native speakers’ perception of frequency. The analysis shows that, while generally objective and subjective values are related, there is a disparity between measures for frequent Polish words. The direction of the relationship, though positive, is also not as strong as in previous studies. I suggest linking objective with subjective frequency measures in research.

Keywords: word frequency, corpus linguistics, English, Polish, subjective estimation, research design
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Experiment – methods
    • 1.1Aims and hypotheses
    • 1.2Participants
    • 1.3Materials
    • 1.4Procedure
    • 1.5Data analysis
    • 1.6Results
  • 2.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00021.brz
References
Alderson, J. C.
2007 Judging the frequency of English words. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 383–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Paul, S., & Spieler, D. H.
1999 Attentional control of lexical processing pathways during word recognition and reading. In S. Garrod, & M. Pickering (Eds.), Language Processing. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J.
2001 Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 291, 639–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J.
2004 Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. I., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R.
2007 The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 445–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., & Evert, S.
2005 Testing the extrapolation quality of word frequency models. In P. Danielsson, & M. Wagenmakers. (Eds.) Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A.
2011 The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58(5), 412–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E.
2016 The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 421, 441–458.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B.
1971 Measurement properties of subjective magnitude estimates of word frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 101, 722–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coane, J. H., & Balota, D. A.
2010 Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency and retrieval test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(12), 2376–2398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T., & Boulton, A.
2015 Classroom applications of corpus analysis. In Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 478–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A.
2000 A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2): 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M.
1992 Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1001–1018.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & Van den Eijnden, E.
2002 Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 471, 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M.
2011 Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desrochers, A., & Bergeron, M.
2000 Valeurs de frequence subjective et d’imagerie pour un echantillon de 1,916 substantifs de la langue francaise. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 54(4), 274–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Baum, S., Dickson, D., & Federmeier, K.
2014 Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1342–1355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A.
1984 Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 256–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Divjak, D.
2012 Frequency effects in language learning and processing. Volume 11. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W. & Rayner, K.
1986 Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 401, 431–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N.
2012 Conducting Reaction Time Research in Second Language Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N.
1992 Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics, 105–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M.
2015 SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
1996 Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A.
2012 Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGee, I.
2008 Word frequency estimates revisited – a response to Alderson (2007). Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 509–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, M. P.
1998 Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, M.
2015 Is corpus word frequency a good yardstick for selecting words to teach? Threshold levels for vocabulary selection. System, 511, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford 3000™ Word List
Oxford University Press.
Reynolds, B. L.
2015 The effects of word form variation and frequency on second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(4), 467–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringeling, T.
1984 Subjective estimates as a useful alternative to word frequency counts. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 8(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
Schad, D. J., Risse, S., Slattery, T., Rayner, K.
2014 Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye movements during reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3), 390–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 2 (BNC World)
2001 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: [URL]
Thompson, G., & Desrochers, A.
2009 Corroborating biased indicators: Global and local agreement among objective and subjective estimates of printed word frequency. Behaviour Research Methods, 41(2), 452–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
2014 SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Cangır, Hakan
2021. Objective and subjective collocational frequency. Pedagogical Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.