Article published in:
Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Anna Pineda
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 42:1] 2019
► pp. 730
References
Aissen, J.
2003Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albizu, P.
1997aThe Syntax of Person Agreement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
1997bGeneralized person-case constraint: a case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. ASJU, 401, 1–33.Google Scholar
2001Datibo sintagmaren izaera sintaktikoaren inguruan: eztabaidarako oinarrizko zenbait datu. In B. Fernández, & P. Albizu (Eds.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On Case and Agreement, 49–69. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2009Construcciones inacusativas con dativos posesivos y dativos de interés en vasco: un análisis derivacionalista. Seminario de Lingüística Teórica, CSIC, Madrid, May 11.Google Scholar
Albizu, P. & Fernández, B.
2002Datives’ intervention effect on Ergativity in Basque. XII Colloquium of Generative Grammar, Universidad Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, April 15–17.Google Scholar
Albizu, P., & Fernández, B.
2006Licit and illicit ERG-DAT pairings. In B. Fernández, & I. Laka (Eds.), Andolin gogoan. Essays in honour of Professor Eguskitza, 69–96. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E.
2003The syntax of ditransitives. Evidence from clitics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arregi, E.
2003On Dative Alternations in Basque. Manuscript, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Arregi, E., & Ormazabal, J.
2003Aditz ditrantsitiboen barne-egitura. In J. M. Makazaga, & B. Oyharçabal (Eds.), Euskal gramatikari buruzko eta literaturari buruzko ikerketak XXI. mendearen atarian. Gramatika gaiak, 119–156. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Arregi, K. & Nevins, A.
2008A principled order to postsyntactic operations. Manuscript, Univesity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & Harvard University.Google Scholar
2012Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artiagoitia, X.
2000Hatsarreak eta parametroak lantzen. Vitoria-Gasteiz: UPV/EHU & Arabako Foru Aldundia.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
1997Thematic Roles and Syntacctic Structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bárany, A.
2018 dom and dative case. Glossa: a journal or general linguistics, 3 (1): 971, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béjar, S., & Rezac, M.
2003Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition, 49–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berro, A. & Fernández, B.
2018Applicatives without verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bonet, E.
1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1994The Person-Case constraint: A morphological approach. In H. Harley & C. Phillips (Eds.), MIT Workinng Papers in Linguistics 22: The morphology-syntax connection. Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Bossong, G.
1985Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objekt Markierung in der neuiranischen Sphrachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1991Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner, & D. A. Kibee (Eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugè, L. & Brugger, G.
1996On the Accusative a in Spanish. Probus, 8 (1), 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2000Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by Phase. M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, M. C.
2003Datives at Large. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Demonte, V.
1987C-command, Preposition and Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 181, 147–157.Google Scholar
1988Remarks on secondary predicates. C-command, extraction and reanalysis. The Linguistic Review, 6 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Dative Alternation in Spanish. Probus, 71, 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, V., & P. Masullo
1999La predicación. Los complementos predicativos. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 2461–2524. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, RAE.Google Scholar
Deustuko Hizkuntzalaritza Mintegia
1989Inkorporazioa perpaus kausatiboetan. In P. Salaburu (Ed.), Sintaxi teoria eta euskara. VII. Udako Ikastaroak, 87–119. Donostia: UPVEHU.Google Scholar
Etxepare, R.
2006Number long distance agreement in (substandard) Basque. In J. A. Lakarra, & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Studies in Basque and historical linguistics in memory of R. L. Trask. ASJU, 401, 303–350. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2014Contact and Change in a restrictive theory of parameters. In C. Picallo (Ed.), Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, 108–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Etxepare, R. & Oyharçabal, B.
2009Bi datibo egitura ipar-ekialdeko zenbait hizkeratan. Lapurdum, 131, 145–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Datives and adpositions in northeastern Basque. In B. Fernández & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Variation in datives: a micro-comparative perspective, 50–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández, B. & Landa, J.
2009Datibo komunztadura beti zaindu, inoiz zaindu ez eta batzuetan baino zaintzen ez demean. Hiru ahoko aldagaia, datu iturri bi, eta erreminta bat: Corsintax. Lapurdum, 131, 159–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, B., Ortiz de Urbina, J., & Landa, J.
2009Komunztadurarik gabeko datiboen gakoez. In R. Etxepare, R. Gómez, & J. A. Lakarra (Eds.), Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre. ASJU, 431, 352–380.Google Scholar
Fernández, B., & Rezac, M.
2010Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren Lekualdatzea: ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nazu bidegurutzean. In B. Fernández, P. Albizu, & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Euskara eta euskarak: aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai. ASJU, 521, 113–149. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2016Differential Object Marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque, 93–139. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, B. & Sarasola, I.
2010 Marinelei abisua: izen ondoko datibo sintagmak izenburuen sintaxian. Lapurdum, 141, 55–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O.
1999Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: locative and dative subjects. Syntax, 2 (2), 101–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harizanov, B.
2014Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 321, 1033–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Mª Ll
1988En torno a la sintaxis y la semántica de los complementos predicativos en español. Estudis de Sintaxis, Estudi General, 81, 7–29.Google Scholar
Kalin, L.
2018Licensing and Differential Object Marking: The View from Neo-Aramaic. Syntax, 21 (2), 112–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keine, S., & Müller, G.
2008Differential argument encoding by impoverishmen. In M. Richards, & A. Malchukov (Eds.), Scales, Linguistiche Arbeits Berichte, 861, 83–136. Universitat Leipzig.Google Scholar
Koizumi, M.
1994Secondary predicates. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31, 25–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R.
2014Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 321, 593–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laka, I.
1993The structure of inflection: A case study in Xº syntax. In J. I. Hualde, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics, 21–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M.
2004Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 31, 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, T.
2019On the nature of differential object marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 37 (1), 167–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masullo, P. J.
1992Incorporation and case theory in Spanish. A crosslinguistic perspective. Doctoral disseration, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O.
2006On head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 371, 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, T.
2004The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mounole, C.
2012Evolution of the transitive verbs in Basque and apparition of datively marked patients. In G. Authier, & K. Haude (Eds.), Ergativity, Transitivity, and Voice, 335–379. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, A.
2011Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 291, 939–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odria, A.
2014Differential Object Marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties. Linguistic Variation, 14 (2), 289–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Euskarazko bigarren mailako predikazioaren murriztapen sintaktikoez. In B. Fernández, & P. Salaburu (Eds.), Ibon Sarasola gorazarre. Homenatge. Homenaje, 449–515. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2017Differential Object Marking and datives in Basque syntax. Doctoral dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2019DIfferntial Object Marking in Basque and Spanish dialects. In A. Berro, B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Basque and Romance: Aligning grammars. 243–275. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J.
2000A conspiracy theory of case and agreement. In R. Martin et al. (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. 235–260. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J.
1998On the syntactic nature of the Me-lui and the Person Case Constraint. ASJU, 32 (2), 415–433.Google Scholar
2001A brief description of some agreement restrictions. In B. Fernández & P. Albizu (Eds.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On case and agreement, 215–241. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2007Object agreement restrictions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 251, 315–347.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J.
2010The derivation of dative alternations. In M. Duguine, S. Huidobro, & N. Madariaga (Eds.), Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, 203–232. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J.
2013aDifferential Object Marking, Case and Agreement. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2 (2), 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bNon Accusative Objects. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 121, 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013cObject clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus, 251, 301–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Historical Changes in Basque Dative Alternations: evidence for a P-based (neo)derivational analysis. Glossa, 2 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, J.
1995Datibo komunztaduraren gainean. In R. Gómez, & J. A. Lakarra (Eds.), Euskal Dialektologiako Kongresua. ASJU, 281, 579–588. Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia.Google Scholar
2003aCausatives. In J. I. Hualde, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A grammar of Basque, 592–607. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bSemiauxiliary verbs. In J. I. Hualde, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A grammar of Basque, 300–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Oyharçabal, B., & Etxepare, R.
2012The absence of Person/Case constraints in Early Lapurdian Basque. In J. Lakarra, J. Gorrotxategi, & B. Urgell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Luis Michelena Chair, 149–169. Vitoria-Gasteiz: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Oyharçabal, B.
2010Basque ditransitives. In M. Duguine, S. Huidobro, & N. Madariaga (Eds.), Argument structure and syntactic relations: A cross-linguistic perspective, 233–260. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
1971Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Rinehart & Winston Inc.Google Scholar
Preminger, O.
2009Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry, 401, 619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezac, M.
2006Agreement displacement in Basque: Derivational principles and lexical parameters. Manuscript, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2007Escaping the Person Case Constraint: referential computation in the phi system. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 61, 97–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008aPhi-Agree and theta-related Case. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-teory: phi-features across interfaces and modules, 83–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008bThe syntax of eccentric agreement: The Person Case Constraint and Absolutive Displacement in Basque. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 261, 61–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009aPerson restrictions in Basque intransitives. Lapurdum, 131, 305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bOn the unifiability of repairs of the Person Case Constraint: French, Basque, Georgian, and Chinook. In R. Etxepare, R. Gómez, & J. A. Lakarra (Eds.), Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre. ASJU, 43 (1–2), 769–790.Google Scholar
2011Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. London/New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezac, M., Albizu, P., & Etxepare, R.
2014The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32 (4), 1273–1330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, N.
2010Uttering trees. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, R. P.
2008Standard Basque. A Progressive Grammar. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M.
2007The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Ordoñez, I.
2016 dom in Basque: grammaticalization, attitudes and ideological representations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Romero, J.
1997Construcciones de doble objeto y gramática universal. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
1983The syntactic forms of predication. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T.
1995On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In H. Haider, S. Olsen, & S. Vikner (Eds), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 207–237. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E.
2010Variability in the case pattern of causative formation in Romance and its implications. Linguistic Inquiry, 411, 445–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. S.
1980Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 111, 203–237.Google Scholar
Zabala, I.
1993Predikazioaren teoriak Gramatika Sortzailean (Euskararen kasua). Doctoral dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
2003Nominal Predication: copulative sentences and secondary predication. In J. I. Hualde, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A Grammar of Basque, 426–446. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bárány, András
2021. Partially ordered case hierarchies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 Crossref logo
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2021. Oblique differential object marking and types of nominals. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:4  pp. 486 ff. Crossref logo
Odria, Ane, Ane Berro & Beatriz Fernández
2022. Pertsona murriztapenak ditu egitura inpertsonalak: euskararen kasua. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :133  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.