Article published in:
Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Anna Pineda
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 42:1] 2019
► pp. 5681
Aissen, J.
2003Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, A.
2016 dom and dative: morphology or syntax? Invited talk at SyntaxLab, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2018 dom and dative case. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
2005Extended Doubling and the VP Periphery. Probus, 17(1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Structures and Strategies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018On a-Marking Topics in the Italian Left Periphery. In R. Petrosino, P. C. Cerrone & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), From sounds to structures. Beyond the veil of Maya, 445–466. Berlin/Boston, De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
1988Psych verbs and Th-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 61, 291–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, P.
1986Il lato sinistro della frase italiana. ATI Journal, 471.Google Scholar
1988L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le construzioni marcate. In L. Renzi (Ed.), Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, 11, 115–225. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Benincà, P., & Poletto, C.
2004Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berretta, M.
1989Sulla presenza dell’accusativo preposizionale nell’italiano settentrionale: note tipologiche. Vox Romanica, 481, 13–37.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T.
2018On the core significance of the periphery: an Afrikaans case study. Talk at UiL-OTS. Utrecht University.
Borer, H.
1984Parametric Syntax. Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bossong, G.
1982Historische Sprachwissenschaft und empirische Universalienforschung. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 331. 17–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985Differenzielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1991Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A.
2002Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocations vs. Marginalization. Studia Linguistica, 561, 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G.
1990Partitive ne and the QP-Hypothesis. A Case Study. Ms. Università di Venezia.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, J., Ciconte, F. M., & D’Alessandro, R.
2018On phasal domains and the difference between subject and object clitics. Poster at GLOW 41 , Budapest.
Cecchetto, C.
1999A Comparative Analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica, 53(1), 40–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
1990Types of A’- dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S.
2012Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford Comparative Studies in Syntax. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, R.
2017When you have too many features: Auxiliaries, agreement and clitics in Italian varieties. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 501. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. V.
2007Acusatiu preposicional i dislocació amb clitic. Caplletra, 421, 185–218.Google Scholar
2009Differential object marking and topicality. The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 331, 832–885. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A.
2013Differential object marking in spanish: state of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 21. 1–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M., & Hinterhölzl, R.
2007Types of Topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, 87–116. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guardiano, C.
2010L’oggeto diretto preposizionale in siciliano. Una breve rassegna e qualche domanda. In J. Garzonio (Ed.), Quaderni di lavoro ASIt 2010. Studi sui dialetti della Sicilia, 95–115. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
1991Introduction to Government and Binding theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, G.
2010Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language, 34(2), 239–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O.
1982Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Jones, M. A.
1995The prepositional accusative in Sardinian: its distribution and syntactic repercussions. In J. C. Smith & M. Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and the Romance Languages, 37–75. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khouja, M.
2015La dislocació en català i espanyol: els acusatius preposicionals. Master Thesis. UAB.Google Scholar
Laca, B.
1987El objeto directo preposicional en español. Romanitisches Jahrbuch, XXXVIII1, 290–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In C. Company Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, Vol. 11, Tomo 11, 421–475. Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A.
2000A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2009aGrammatica diacronica del napoletan. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bAspetti della sintassi della periferia sinistra del cosentino. In D. Pescarini (Ed.), Studi sui dialetti della Calabria, 3–24. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M.
2004Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 31, 75–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, L.
2009A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Indefinite objects: Scrambling, Choice Functions, and Differential Object Marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016(In)definiteness, specificity and differential object marking in Romance. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 241–265. Berlin: De Gruter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, R. & Franco, L.
2016Goal and dom datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 341, 197–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, R. & Savoia, L. M.
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. 31 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Martí-Girbau, N.
1994Anàlisi de la construcció de + SA en Català. Master Thesis. UAB.Google Scholar
Meier, H.
1947O problema do acusativo preposicional no catalao. Boletim de Filologia, 81, 237–260.Google Scholar
1948Sobre as origens do acusativo preposicional nas línguas románicas. In Ensaios de Filologia Românica, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Melis, C.
1995El objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio Cid. Estudio sintáctico- pragmático. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El Complemento directo preposicional, 133–163. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Moll, F. de B.
1968Gramàtica catalana referida especialment a les Illes Balears. Palma: Ed. Moll.Google Scholar
Neuburger, K. & Stark, E.
2014Differential Object Marking in Corsican. Regularities and triggering factors. Linguistics, 52(2), 365–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J.
2013Agreement restrictions revisited. Too many beggars, too few hosts. Unpublished Ms., University of the Basque Country /University of Extremadura.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. & Roca, F.
In press. Differential Object Marking (dom) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In Á. Gallego Ed. The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects Oxford Oxford University Press Crossref
Pererea, J.
1986Contribució a l’estudi de les preposicions en el Tirant lo Blanc (primera part). Llengua & Literatura, 11, 31–49. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pineda, A.
2013Double object constructions and dative / accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: a unified account. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2 (1), 57–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press a. The development of dom in the diachrony of Catalan: (dis)similarities with respect to Spanish. In J. Kabatek, P. Obrist, & A. Wall Eds. New reflections on dom in Spanish, Catalan and beyond Berlin De Gruyter
In press b. El marcatge diferencial d’objecte en català (i Fabra). In M. Ángel Pradilla Ed. La lingüística de Pompeu Fabra Tarragona Universitat Rovira i Virgili
In press c. From Dative to Accusative. An Ongoing Syntactic Change in Romance. Probus.
Pineda, A. & Royo, C.
2017Differential indirect object marking in Romance (and how to get rid of it). Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LXII, 4 (Special issue: Differential Object Marking in Romance: some more pieces of the puzzle), 445–462.Google Scholar
Pineda, A. & Irimia, M.
2018On the setting of Scales in the diachrony of dom in Catalan and Romanian. Seminari del Centre de Lingüística Teòrica. UAB.Google Scholar
Richards, N.
2006Beyond strength and weakness. Ms. MIT.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M.
2007The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking. Doctoral Dissertations. AAI3276641. https://​opencommons​.uconn​.edu​/dissertations​/AAI3276641
Rohlfs, G.
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1971Autour de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans les langues romanes. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 351, 312–334.Google Scholar
Rosselló, J.
2002El SV, I: Verb i arguments verbals. In J. Solà et al. (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, 1853–1949. Barcelona, Empúries.Google Scholar
Sancho Cremades, P.
2002La preposició i el sintagma preposicional. In Solà, J. et al. (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, 1698–1796. Barcelona, Empúries.Google Scholar
Seržant, A.
2017Differential object markers and datives. Talk at 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Universitat Zurich.
Shaer, B. & Frey, W.
2004“Integrated” and “non-integrated” left-peripheral elements in German and English. In B. Shaer, W. Frey, & C. Maienborn (Eds.), Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, 465–502. Berlin: Zentrum fur allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
Silverstein, M.
1976Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Suñer, M.
1993[1988]El papel de la concordancia en las construcciones de reduplicación de clíticos. In O. Fernández Soriano (Ed.), Los pronombres átonos, 174–204. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Torrego, E.
1998The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its Implications. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 445–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, E.
2002L’oració com a unitat informativa. In J. Solà et al. (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 21, 1221–1279. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Villalba, X.
1998Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In F. Roca, & O. Fullana (Eds.), Studies on the syntax of central Romance languages: 227–241.Google Scholar
2000The syntax of sentence periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2003An exceptional exclamative sentence type in Romance. Lingua, 1131, 713–745. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Heusinger, K.
2002Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure. Journal of Semantics, 19 (3), 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2020. Variation in differential object marking: On some differences between Spanish and Romanian. Open Linguistics 6:1  pp. 424 ff. Crossref logo
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Anna Pineda
2021. Differential object marking in Catalan. Linguistic Variation Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.