Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 42:2 (2019) ► pp.186–233

La saillance en français et en chinois

Approche multifactorielle et étude contrastive

 | Lattice, CNRS, ENS, PSL Research University, Université Paris 3, USPC
 | Lattice, CNRS, ENS, PSL Research University, Université Paris 3, USPC
Nous proposons dans cet article une analyse multifactorielle et contrastive de la notion de saillance, telle qu’elle s’applique aux entités du discours et détermine l’interprétation référentielle d’une anaphore. En observant les phénomènes de saillance en français et en chinois, notre but est de montrer que la saillance est influencée par une multitude de facteurs, de manière plus ou moins comparable dans les deux langues. Nous classons ces facteurs selon leur nature syntaxique, sémantique, textuelle ou pragmatique. Notre approche contrastive permet d’illustrer que, si plusieurs divergences – qui sont souvent corrélées avec les différences typologiques des deux langues – s’observent au niveau syntaxique, de nombreux facteurs de saillance dérivent plutôt de principes cognitifs généraux.
Keywords: saillance, approche multifactorielle, étude contrastive, étude de corpus
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Notion de saillance
    • 1.1Contexte de recherche: Saillance et référence
    • 1.2Approche: La saillance en tant que notion multifactorielle
  • 2.Facteurs syntaxiques
    • 2.1Fonction syntaxique
    • 2.2Construction syntaxique à effet de saillance
    • 2.3Parallélisme syntaxique
    • 2.4Hiérarchie syntaxique
  • 3.Facteurs sémantiques
    • 3.1Sémantique du verbe (dans la proposition de l’antécédent)
    • 3.2Sémantique du verbe (dans la proposition de l’anaphore)
    • 3.3Sémantique du référent
  • 4.Facteurs textuels
    • 4.1L’ordre d’apparition des entités référentielles
    • 4.2La récence linéaire
    • 4.3Seul antécédent
    • 4.4Répétition et fréquence d’apparition
    • 4.5Personnage (protagoniste) principal dans la narration
  • 5.Facteurs pragmatiques
    • 5.1Référent connu/nouveau
    • 5.2Contrainte pragmatique
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Récapitulatif des facteurs de saillance
    • 6.2Universalité et spécificité des facteurs de saillance
    • 6.3Limites de l’étude présentée
  • Conclusion
  • Remarques
  • Références

Article language: French

Published online: 16 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00034.hou
References (89)
Références
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bilger, M., Buscail, L. & Mignon, F. (Eds.) 2017. Langue française mise en relief. Aspects grammaticaux et discursifs. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar
Boisseau, M. & Hamm, A. (Eds.) 2015. Saillance. La saillance en langue et en discours. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1976. Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Points of View. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G. & Smyth, R. 1998. Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 391, 593–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charolles, M. 2002. La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Chiarcos, C., Claus, B. & Grabski, M. (Eds.) 2011. Salience. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Function in Discourse. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Sengul, C. J. 1979. In Search of Referents for Nouns and Pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 71, 35–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Col, G. 2012. Focalisation, saillance et instruction de construction du sens. In P. Cappeau & S. Hanote (dir.) , Focalisation(s), 84–101. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: syntax and morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cowles, W. & Dawidzuik, L. 2016. Ambiguity Avoidance in Noun-Phrase Anaphora: The Repeated Name Advantage. In M. Fossard & M.-J. Béguelin (Eds.), Nouvelles perspectives sur l’anaphore. Points de vue linguistique, psycholinguistique et acquisitionnel, 213-230. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2002. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Relativity, Linguistic Variation and Language Universals. CogniTextes Volume 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fossard, M. 1999. Traitement anaphorique et structure du discours. Etude psycho-linguistique des effets du focus de discours sur la spécificité de deux marqueurs référentiels: le pronom anaphorique “il” et le nom propre répété. In Cognito, 151, 33–40.Google Scholar
Fukumura, K. & Gompel, R. P. G. van. 2011. The Effect of Animacy on the Choice of Referring Expression. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 1472–1504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C. & Caramazza, A. 1974. Implicit Causality in Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 51, 459–64.Google Scholar
Gelormini-Lezama, C. & Almor, A. 2011. Repeated Names, Overt Pronouns, and Null Pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 437–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. 1989. Mechanisms That Improve Referential Access. Cognition, 321, 99–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Hargreaves, D. J. 1988. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 699–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. 31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Foster, K. L. 2000. Language Comprehension and Probe-List Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 261, 766–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C. & Chan, D. 1995. Pronouns, Passives, and Discourse Coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, 216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. & Gilliom, L. A. 1993. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse. Cognitive Science, 171, 311–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C. & Hendrick, R. 1998. The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse. Cognitive Science, 221, 389–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K. & Yang, C. L. 1999. Processing of Reference and the Structure of Language: An Analysis of Complex Noun Phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 353–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C. & Scearce, K. A. 1995. Pronominalization and Discourse Coherence, Discourse Structure and Pronoun Interpretation. Memory & Cognition, 231, 313–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greene, S. B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. 1992. Pronoun Resolution and Discourse Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 181, 266–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W. & Caramazza, A. 1978. Parallel Function Strategy in Pronoun Assignment. Cognition, 61, 117–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, B. J., Weinstein, S. & Joshi, A. K. 1995. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 211, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K. 1988. Universals of Topic-Comment Structure. In M. Hammond et al. (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology, 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Haude, K. et Montaut, A. (Eds.) 2012. La saillance. Faits de Langues 39.Google Scholar
Her, O.-S. 1991. Topic as a Grammatical Function in Chinese. Lingua, 841, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoek, K. V. 2007. Pronominal Anaphora. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. 890-915, Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
Hu, Q. 2008. A Corpus-Based Study on Zero Anaphora Resolution in Chinese Discourse. PhD Thesis, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T.J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. 1987. Existential Sentences in Chinese and (in) Definiteness. The Representation of (in) Definiteness, 226–253. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huang, S. 1992. Getting to Know Referring Expressions: Anaphor and Accessibility in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of ROCLING V, 27–51.Google Scholar
Hudson, S. D. & Tanenhaus, M. K. 1997. Assigning Antecedents to Ambiguous Pronouns: The Role of the Center of Attention as the Default Assignment. In M. Walker et al. (Eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse, 199–226. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iida, M. 1998. Discourse Coherence and Shifting Centers in Japanese Texts. In M. Walker et al. (Eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse, 161–180. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inkova, O. (Ed.) 2011. Saillance. Aspects linguistiques et communicatifs de la mise en évidence dans un texte. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Kail, M. 1979. Coréférence et thématisation. L’Année psychologique, 791, 411–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kameyama, M. 1986. A Property-Sharing Constraint in Centering. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 200–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Prédication seconde et structure informationnelle : la relative de perception comme construction présentative. Langue française, 1271, 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. & Lemoine, K. 1996. Vers une grammaire des compléments zéro en français parlé. In J. Chuquet & M. Fryd (Eds.), Absence de Marques et Représentation de l’absence, 11, 279–309. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Landragin, F. 2004. Saillance physique et saillance cognitive. Corela. Cognition, Représentation, Langage, 2–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 2, descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lappin, S. & Leass, H. J. 1994. An Algorithm for Pronominal Anaphora Resolution. Computational Linguistics, 201, 535–561.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. 1976. Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic, 457-489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lima, L. & Bianco, M. 1999. Le problème des références dans la compréhension des textes à l’école primaire : le cas de “il” et de “lui”. Revue française de pédagogie, 1261, 83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. 1980. Sémantique linguistique. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Google Scholar
Matthews, A. & Chodorow, M. S. 1988. Pronoun Resolution in Two-Clause Sentences: Effects of Ambiguity, Antecedent Location, and Depth of Embedding. Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 245–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mélanie-Becquet, F. & Prevost, S. 2014. Eléments initiaux : combinaisons et schémas préférentiels dans un corpus d’articles scientifiques. Corpus, 13 29–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neveu, F. 2011. Dictionnaire des sciences du langage. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Pattabhiraman, T. 1992. Aspects of Salience in Natural Language Generation. PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Pottier, B. 1992. Sémantique générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Prat-Sala, M. & Branigan, H. P. 2000. Discourse Constraints on Syntactic Processing in Language Production: A Cross-Linguistic Study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 421, 168–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prevost, S. 1998. La notion de Thème : flou terminologique et conceptuel. Cahiers de praxématique, 301, 13–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. 2005. The Relative Contribution of Syntactic and Semantic Prominence to the Salience of Discourse Entities. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J. & Garrod, S. C. 1981. Understanding Written Language: Explorations of Comprehension Beyond the Sentence. Chichester: John Wiley and sons.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. 2010. Entrenchment, Salience, and Basic Levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 117-138. Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
Schnedecker, C. 2011. La notion de saillance: problèmes définitoires et avatars. In O. Inkova (2011), 23–43.Google Scholar
Shi, D. 2000. Topic and Topic-Comment Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 761, 383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidner, C. L. 1979. Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A. & Kleinman, D. 1994. Thematic Roles, Focus and the Representation of Events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 91, 519–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 21. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsao, F. 1987. A Topic-Comment Approach to the Ba Construction. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 151, 1–54.Google Scholar
Turan, U. 1998. Ranking Forward-Looking Centers in Turkish: Universal and Language-Specific Properties. In M. Walker et al. (Eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse, 139–160. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Hue, C. W. 2003. Constraining the Comprehension of Pronominal Expressions in Chinese. Cognition, 861, 283–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Wu, J. T. 1999. Comprehension of Referring Expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 715–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Wu, J. T. & Chou, T. L. 2001. The Processing of Coreference for Reduced Expressions in Discourse Integration. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 301, 21–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
陈 (Chen), 平 (Ping). 1987. 汉语零形回指的话语分析 (Analyse Discursive de l’anaphore Zéro En Chinois). 中国语文 (Zhongguo Yuwen) 51: r378.Google Scholar
陈 (Chen), 永明 (Yongming) and 崔 (Cui), 耀 (Yao). 1994. 句子先提述的参与者在可提取性上的优势现象 (The Advantage of Accessibility of First-Mentioned Participants in Chinese Sentences). 心理学报 (Acta Psychologica Sinica), no. 021: 113–20.Google Scholar
陈 (Chen), 林 (Lin). 2007. 基于特征提取和机器学习的现代汉语人称指示代词消解研究 (Research on Pronominal Anaphora Resolution Based on Feature Extraction and Machine Learning). 硕士 (Master Thesis), 清华大学 (Qinghua University).Google Scholar
侯 (Hou), 敏 (Min) and 孙 (Sun), 建军 (Jianjun). 2005. 汉语中的零形回指及其在汉英机器翻译中的处理对策 (Zero Anaphora in Chinese and How to Process It in Chinese-English MT). 中文信息学报 (Journal of Chinese Information Processing) 191: 15–21.Google Scholar
孙 (Sun), 雯 (Wen). 2014. 现代汉语零形回指加工的ERP研究 (An ERP Study on Processing Zero Anaphor in Modern Chinese). 硕士 (Master Thesis), 江苏师范大学 (Jiangsu Normal University).Google Scholar
蒋 (Jiang), 平 (Ping). 2004. 零形回指的句法和语篇特征研究 (Syntactic and discourse features of zero anaphora: with specific reference to its resolution in Chinese). 博士 (PhD Thesis), 上海外国语大学 (Shanghai International Studies University).Google Scholar
. 2017. 汉语零形回指先行语的句法可及性等级序列 (Accessibility Hierarchy of Antecedents in Chinese Zero Anaphora). 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版) (Journal of Nanchang University), no. 031: 135–40.Google Scholar
缪 (Mou), 小春 (Xiaochun) and 宋 (Song), 正国 (Zhengguo). 1995. 动词语义和句子语法对代词加工的影响 (The influence of verb meaning and sentence grammar on pronoun processing). 心理科学 (Psychological Science).Google Scholar
屈 (Qu), 承熹 (Chengxi). 2006. 汉语篇章语法 (A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese). 北京语言大学出版社 (Beijing Language and Culture University Press).Google Scholar
王 (Wang), 德亮 (Deliang). 2004. 汉语零形回指解析——基于向心理论的研究 (Zero Anaphora Resolution in Chinese: A Study Based on Centering Theory). 现代外语 (Modern Foreign Languages), no. 041: 350–359+436.Google Scholar
王 (Wang), 力 (Li). 1947. 中国现代语法 (La Grammaire Chinoise Moderne).Google Scholar
王 (Wang), 倩 (Qian). 2014. 汉语零形回指的认知机制研究 (A Study of the Cognitive Mechanism of Chinese Zero Anaphora). 博士 (PhD Thesis), 浙江大学 (Zhejiang University).Google Scholar
许 (Xu), 余龙 (Yulong). 2000. 英汉指称词语表达的可及性 (Refering expressions and their accessibility in Chinese and English). 外语教学与研究 (Foreign Language Teaching and Research), no. 051: 321–328+399.Google Scholar
. 2007. 话题引入与语篇回指——一项基于民间故事语料的英汉对比研究 (Topic Introduction and Discourse Anaphora in Chinese and English:A Corpus-based Contrastive Study). 外语教学 (Foreign Language Education), no. 061: 1–5.Google Scholar
张 (Zhang), 伯江 (Bojiang). 2007. 施事和受事的语义语用特征及其在句式中的实现 (Agent and Patient: Their Semantic and Pragmatic Status and Their Roles in Chinese Grammatical Constructions). 博士 (PhD Thesis), 复旦大学 (Fudan University).Google Scholar
朱 (Zhu), 勘宇 (Kanyu). 2002. 汉语零形回指的句法驱动力 (The Syntactic Motivation of Zero Anaphora in Mandarin Chinese). 汉语学习 (Chinese Language Learning), no. 041: 73–80.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Li, Jingrao
2023. Accès en chinois à un outil lexical pour aider à la rédaction scientifique des apprenants sinophones. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l'APLIUT Vol. 42 N°2 DOI logo
Hou, Jiaqi & Frédéric Landragin
2021. L’effet des facteurs de distance et de fréquence sur la saillance des entités référentielles. Langages N° 224:4 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Hou, Jiaqi & Frédéric Landragin
2024. Referential Salience in French and Mandarin Chinese: Influence of Syntactic, Semantic and Textual Factors. Languages 9:2 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Hou, Jiaqi, Frédéric Landragin, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Conceptions lexicale et cognitive de la notion d’antécédent : une étude contrastive de l’anaphore pronominale en français et en chinois. SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 12011 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.