Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Interfaces in Romance: A constraint-based approach
Edited by Gabriela Bîlbîie
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43:1] 2020
► pp. 1–22
Introduction

A constraint-based approach to linguistic interfaces

| University of Bucharest | Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle
Article outline
  • 1.The interface debate in linguistics
  • 2.Interfaces in a constraint-based grammar
  • 3.The HPSG framework
    • 3.1Main properties of HPSG
    • 3.2Basic architecture of HPSG
  • 4.Brief overview of the HPSG literature on Romance languages
  • 5.Contributions of this collection
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00038.bil
References
Abeillé, A.
2003 A Lexicon-and Construction-Based Approach to Coordinations. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the HPSG’03 Conference, 5–25. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2005 Les syntagmes conjoints et leurs fonctions syntaxiques. Langages, 1601, 42–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Les grammaires d’unification. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Godard, D.
1994 The Complementation of French Auxiliaries. In R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss & M. Senturia, Eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1997 The Syntax of French Negative Adverbs. In P. Hirschbuhler & F. Marineau, Eds., Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Sag, I. A.
1998 Two Kinds of Composition in French Complex Predicates. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol & T. Nakazawa, Eds, Complex Predicates in Nonderivational Syntax, 1–41. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Godard, D.
2001 Varieties of ESSE in Romance languages. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol, Eds., The Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 2–22. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002 The Syntactic Structure of French Auxiliaries. Language, 78(3), 404–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Les prédicats complexes dans les langues romanes. In D. Godard, Ed., Les langues romanes. Problèmes de la phrase simple, 125–184. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Borsley, R. & Espinal, M.-T.
2006 The syntax of Comparative Correlatives in French and Spanish. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 6–26. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Godard, D. & Sabio, F.
2008 Two types of NP preposing in French. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 306–324. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Bîlbîie, G. & Mouret, F.
2014 A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In H. Boas & F. Gonzálvez-García, Eds., Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar, 227–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Chrysmann, B. & Shiraishi, A.
2016 Syntactic Mismatch in French Peripheral Ellipsis. In C. Piñón, Ed., Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 111, 1–30. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A. & Borsley, B.
2020 The basic properties and elements of HPSG. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig, Eds., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Abeillé, A., Hemforth, B., Winckel, E. & Gibson, E.
2020 Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
An, Aixiu & Abeillé, A.
2019 Number agreement in French binomials. In C. Piñón, Ed., Empirical Issues in Syntax and semantics 121, 31–60. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Balari, S. & Dini, L.
1997 Romance in HPSG. CSLI Lecture Notes, number 75. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, G.
2008 A Syntactic Account of Romanian Correlative Coordination from a Romance Perspective. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 25–45. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2017 Grammaire des constructions elliptiques: Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, G. & Laurens, F.
2009 A Construction-based Analysis of Verbless Relative Adjuncts in French and Romanian. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 5–25. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bouma, G., Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A.
2001 Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(1), 1–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Mchombo, S.
1995 The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 131, 181–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I. & Wechsler, S.
2015 Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castroviejo, E., Fernádez-Soriano, O. & Pérez-Jiménez, I.
2017 Introduction. Boundaries, phases and interfaces. In O. Fernádez-Soriano, E. Castroviejo & I. Pérez-Jiménez, Eds., Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces, 2–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
2005 Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction. Research on Language and Computation, 3(4), 281–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.
1975 Montague’s Semantic Theory and Transformational Grammar. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Crysmann, B.
1999 Licensing Proclisis in European Portuguese. In F. Corblin, J.-M. Marandin & C. Dobrovie-Sorin, Eds., Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics. Selected papers from the Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique de Paris (CSSP 1997), 255–276. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
2002 Constraint-Based Coanalysis: Portuguese Cliticisation and Morphology-Syntax Interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, number 15. Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
2020 Morphology. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig, Eds., Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Chapter 21. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P.
1999 Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Kuthy, K.
2002 Discontinuous NPs in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
de Swart, H. & Sag, I. A.
2002 Negation and Negative Concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(4), 373–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, E. & Vallduví, E.
1996 Information Packaging in HPSG. In C. Grover & E. Vallduví, Eds., Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science, Vol. 12: Studies in HPSG, 1–32. Scotland: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fischer, S.
2010 Word-Order Change as a Source of Grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. & Gabriel, C.
2016 Grammatical interfaces in Romance languages: An introduction. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel, Eds., Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 1–20. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, R., Sevdali, C. & Truswell, R.
2015 Introduction. In R. Folli, C. Sevdali & R. Truswell, Eds., Syntax and its Limits, 1–15. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. & Fedorenko, E.
2013 The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognition Processes, 281, 88–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, J. & Sag, I. A.
2000 Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives, vol. 1231. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Godard, D. & Marandin, J.-M.
2006 Reinforcing Negation: the Case of Italian. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 174–194. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Green, G.
2011 Modelling Grammar Growth: Universal Grammar without Innate Principles of Parameters. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 378–403. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.
2007a Deriving dynamic interfaces. Linguistic Analysis, 331, 3–19.Google Scholar
2007b Spelling out dynamic interfaces. Linguistic Analysis, 331, 197–208.Google Scholar
2009 Phases and Interfaces. In K. Grohmann, Ed., InterPhases. Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, 1–22. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ionescu, E.
2004 Understanding Romanian Negation. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, G.
2010 Negative Concord with Negative Quantifiers: A Polyadic Quantifier Approach to Romanian Negative Concord. PhD Dissertation, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, G. & Richter, F.
2009 Negative Concord in Romanian as Polyadic Quantification. In S. Müller, Ed., Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 150–170. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2015 Negative Concord with Polyadic Quantifiers. The Case of Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(2), 607–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. & Zaenen, A.
1989 Long-distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure and Functional Uncertainty. In M. Baltin & A. Kroch, Eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, 17–42. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kathol, A., Przepiórkowski, A. & J. Tseng
2011 Advanced Topics in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 54–111. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B.
1977 Noun Phrase Acceptability and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B. & Sag, I. A.
2002 Negation without Verb-Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 201, 339–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, T. & Alexiadou, A.
2015 Syntax – The State of a Controversial Art. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 11, 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Jonas
1996 An Underspecified HPSG Representation for Information Structure. In J. Tsuji, Ed., Proceedings of Coling-96. 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96), 670–675. Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kuhn, J.
2007 Interfaces in Constraint-Based Theories of Grammar. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 613–650. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. & Copestake, A.
1999 Default Representation in Constraint-Based Frameworks. Computational Linguistics, 25(1), 55–105.Google Scholar
Meurers, W. D.
2001 On Expressing Lexical Generalizations in HPSG. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), 161–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. & Sag, I. A.
1997 French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monachesi, P.
1997 Decomposing Italian Clitics. In S. Balari & L. Dini, Eds., Romance in HPSG, 305–357. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1998a Italian Restructuring Verbs: A Lexical Analysis. In E. Hinrichs, A. Kathol & T. Nakazawa, Eds, Complex predicates in Nonderivational Syntax, 313–368. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1998b The morphosyntax of Romanian cliticization. In P. Coppen, H. Van Halteren & L. Tennissen, Eds., Proceedings of Computational Linguistics in The Netherlands 1997, 99–118. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1999a A lexical approach to Italian cliticization. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1999b On certain properties of Romanian auxiliary (and modal) verbs. In G. Bouma, E. Hinrichs, G.-J. Kruijff & R. Oehrle, Eds., Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics, 99–115. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2000 Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex. In B. Gerlach & J. Grijzenhout, Eds., Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, 255–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005 The verbal complex in Romance: a case study in grammatical interfaces. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouret, F.
2005 La syntaxe des coordinations correlatives du français. Langages, 1601, 67–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 A Phrase Structure Approach to Argument Cluster Coordination. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 247–267. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2007 Grammaire des constructions coordonnées. Coordinations simples et coordinations à redoublement en français contemporain. PhD Dissertation, Université Paris 71.Google Scholar
Müller, S.
2015 HPSG – A Synopsis. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 21, 937–973. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2018 Grammatical theory. From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Müller, S. & Machicao y Priemer, A.
2019 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In A. Kertész, E. Moravcsik & C. Rákosi, Eds., Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, 317–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, S., Abeillé, A., Borsley, R. & Koenig, J.-P.
Eds. 2020 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Mycock, L.
2015 Syntax and its interfaces: an overview. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou, Eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. 11, 24–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Norcliffe, E.
2007 Constructing Spanish Complex Predicates. In S. Müller, Ed, The Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 194–213. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pollard, C.
1996 On head non-movement. In H. Bunt & A. van Horck, Eds., Discontinuous Constituency, 279–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.
1987 Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes, No. 13. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1994 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P.
2004 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A.
1999 Negative Polarity Questions and Italian Negative Concord. In V. Kordoni, Ed., Tübingen Studies in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 353–400. Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, number 132. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Pullum, G.
1977 Word Order Universals and Grammatical Relations. In P. Cole & J. Sadock, Eds., Grammatical Relations, 249–277. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. & Scholz, B.
2001 On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks. In P. de Groote, G. Morill & C. Retoré, Eds., Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference, 17–43. Berlin: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C.
2007 Introduction. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 1–13. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, F. & M. Sailer
1999 A lexicalist collocation analysis of sentential negation and negative concord in French. In V. Kordoni, Ed., Tübingen Studies in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 231–300. Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, number 132. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Richter, F. & Sailer, M.
2004 Basic Concepts of Lexical Resource Semantics. In A. Beckmann & N. Preining, Eds., ESSLLI 2003 – Course Material I, volume 5 of Collegium Logicum, 87–143. Vienna: Kurt Gödel Society Wien.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A.
1997 English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 431–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis. In H. Boas & I. A. Sag, Eds., Sign-based Construction Grammar, 69–202. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A. & Wasow, T.
2011 Performance-Compatible Competence Grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars, Eds., Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, 359–377. Oxford, UK / Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sag, I. A., Wasow, T. & Bender, E.
2003 Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shieber, S.
1986 An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, A., Abeillé, A. & Hemforth, B.
2019 Verbal mismatch in Right-Node Raising. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), 1141. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
2011 Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K. & Sedivy, J.
1996 Using Eye Movements to Study Spoken Language Comprehension: Evidence for Visually Mediated Incremental Interpretation. In T. Inui & J. McClelland, Eds., Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, 457–478. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H.
1984 Introductory remarks. In W. de Geest & Y. Putseys, Eds., Sentential Complementation, 1–9. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villavicencio, A., Sadler, L. & Arnold, D.
2005 An HPSG Account of Closest Conjunct Agreement in NP Coordination in Portuguese. In S. Müller, Ed., The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 427–447. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar