Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 44:1 (2021) ► pp.66100
References (70)
References
Arcodia, G. F. 2018. Coordinating nominal compounds: Universals vs. areal tendencies. Linguistics, 56 (6), 1197–1243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arcodia, G. F., & Basciano, B. 2018. The Construction Morphology Analysis of Chinese Word Formation. In G. Booij (Ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology, 219–253. Cham: Springer, vol. 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arcodia, G. F., Grandi, N., & Wälchli, B. 2010. Coordination in compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., Guevara, E., & Pirrelli, V. 2007. NN compounds in Italian: Modelling category induction and analogical extension. Lingue e Linguaggio, 6 (2), 263–290.Google Scholar
2009. Sulla tipologia dei composti N+N in italiano: Principi categoriali ed evidenza distribuzionale a confronto. In G. Ferrari, M. Mosca & R. Benatti (Eds.), Linguistica e modelli tecnologici di ricerca. Atti del XL Congresso Internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Vercelli, 21–23 settembre 2006), 73–95. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Baroni, M., Guevara, E., & Zamparelli, R. 2009. The dual nature of deverbal nominal constructions: evidence from acceptability ratings and corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, B. 2011. Word formation. In M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages: Vol. I. Structures, 532–563. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 2005. The borderline between derivation and compounding. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. Pfeiffer & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations, 97–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, A. 1999. Note sui composti VN dell’italiano. In P. Benincà, A. M. Mioni & L. Vanelli (Eds.), Fonologia e Morfologia dell’Italiano e dei Dialetti d’Italia. Atti del XXXI Congresso Internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Padova, 25–27 settembre 1997), 1000–1036. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2017. Osservazioni sui composti verbo-nome dell’italiano antico. In P. D’Achille & M. Grossmann (Eds.), Per la storia della formazione delle parole in italiano. Un nuovo corpus in rete (MIDIA) e nuove prospettive di studio, 99–117. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4 (2), 319–20.Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2008. Constructional idioms as products of language change: The aan het + INFINITIVE construction in Dutch. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Construction grammar and language change, 79–104. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010a. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010b. Compound construction: Schemas or analogy? A construction morphology perspective. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding, 93–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010c. Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 41, 543–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G., & Hüning, M. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar, 47–66. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouillon, P., Ježek, E., Melloni, C., & Picton, A. 2012. Annotating qualia relations in Italian and French complex nominals. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Uğur Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk & S. Piperidis (Eds.), The eighth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1527–1532.Google Scholar
Brucale, L. 2012. Latin compounds. Probus, 241, 93–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchi, E., & Chauveau, J-P. 2015. From Latin to Romance. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1931–1957. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dardano, M. 2009. Costruire parole: La morfologia derivativa dell’italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., & Thornton, A. M. 1991. Doppie basi e binarismo nella morfologia italiana. Rivista di Linguistica, 3 (1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Du Cange, et al., 1982. Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis. Niort: L. Favre. [URL]
Floricic, F. 2008. The Italian verb-noun anthroponimic compounds at the Syntax/morphology interface. Morphology, 18 (2), 167–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, L. 2008. Constituent order in compounds and syntax: Typology and diachrony. Morphology, 18 (2), 117–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gather, A. 2001. Romanische Verb-Nomen-Komposita. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A., & Mauri, C. 2008. From cause to contrast: A study in semantic change. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y. Shin, Y. Nishina & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Studies on Grammaticalization, 303–320. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grandi, N. 2006. Considerazioni sulla definizione e la classificazione dei composti. Annali dell’Università di Ferrara. Sezione di Lettere online 11, 31–52.Google Scholar
Grandi, N., Nissim, M., & Tamburini, F. 2011. Noun-clad adjectives. On the adjectival status of non-head constituents of Italian attributive compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 10 (1), 161–70.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. 2012. Romanian compounds. Probus, 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, M., & D’Achille, P. 2019. Compound color terms in Italian. In I. Raffaelli, D. Katuna & B. Kerovec (Eds.), Lexicalization patterns in color naming: A cross-linguistic perspective, 61–79. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C. 2015. Foreign word-formation in Italian. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1660–1679. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Thornton, A. M. 1992. Tendenze nella formazione delle parole nell’italiano del ventesimo secolo. In B. Moretti, D. Petrini & S. Bianconi (Eds.), Linee di tendenza dell’italiano contemporaneo. Atti del XXV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Lugano, 19–21 settembre 1991), 25–55. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Klingebiel, K. 1989. Noun+verb compounding in Western Romance (Vol. 1131). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lasserre, M. 2016. De l’intrusion d’un lexique allogène. Le’exemple des éléments néoclassiques. PhD dissertation. University of Toulouse II – Jean Jaurès.Google Scholar
Litta, E., Passarotti, M., & Culy, C. 2016. Formatio formosa est. Building a Word Formation Lexicon for Latin. In Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC–it 2016), 185–189.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E. 2008. Composti intitolativi in italiano: Un’oscillazione. In E. Cresti (Ed.), Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano. Atti del IX congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana (Firenze, 14–17 giugno 2006), 555–562. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Masini, F., & Audring, J. 2019. Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory, 365–389. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Masini, F., & Iacobini, C. 2018. Schemas and discontinuity in Italian: The view from Construction Morphology. In G. Booij (Ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology, 81–109. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masini, F., & Scalise, S. 2012. Italian compounds. Probus, 61–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, D. 2009. Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and linguistics compass, 3 (4), 1076–1096. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. 1890. Italienische Grammatik (Vol. 21). Leipzig: Reisland.Google Scholar
Micheli, M. S. 2019. The diachrony of Italian mal(e)- constructions: From compounding to derivation. Lingue e Linguaggio, 18 (1), 91–118.Google Scholar
2020. Composizione italiana in diacronia: Le parole composte dell’italiano nel quadro della Morfologia delle Costruzioni. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Micheli, M. S., & Štichauer, P. 2020. Sulla diacronia della composizione verbo-nominale in italiano. Linguistica Pragensia, 20 (1), 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60 (4), 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. On the nature of noun incorporation. Language, 62 (1), 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen Whitehead, B. 2012. Pickpocket compounds from Latin to Romance. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of the Humanities, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Peša Matracki, I. 2006. Linee di tendenza nella formazione delle parole nell’italiano contemporaneo. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia, 511, 103–146.Google Scholar
Prati, A. 1931. Composti imperativi quali casati e soprannomi. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 71, 250–264.Google Scholar
Radimský, J. 2015. Noun+Noun Compounds in Italian: A corpus-based study. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita.Google Scholar
Rainer, F. 2008. Neo- and Neo-Latin. Word Structure, 1 (1), 53–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Die Integration des lateinischen Kompositionstyps tauriformis im Französischen und Italienischen. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 125 (1), 45–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. On the origin of Italian adjectival colour compounds of the type grigioverde ‘grey-green’. In R. D’Alessandro, G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), Di tutti i colori: Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann, 247–256. Utrecht University Repository.Google Scholar
Renzi, L., & Salvi, G. 2010. Italiano antico. In R. Simone (Ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani, [URL] (accessed: 03/03/2021).
Ricca, D. 2005. Al limite tra sintassi e morfologia: I composti aggettivali VN nell’italiano contemporaneo. In M. Grossmann & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), La formazione delle parole. Atti del XXXVII Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana (L’Aquila, 25–27 settembre 2003), 465–486. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2010. Corpus data and theoretical implications: With special reference to Italian VN compounds. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding, 237–254. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Verb-noun compounds in Romance. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (Vol. 401), 688–707. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, S. 1984. Morfologia lessicale. Padova: Clesp.Google Scholar
Serianni, L. 1998. Lezioni di grammatica storica italiana. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Štichauer, P. 2015a. La formazione delle parole in diacronia: Studi di morfologia derivazionale dell’italiano tra il Cinquecento e l’Ottocento. Prague: Karolinum Press.Google Scholar
2015b. The meaning of Italian VN compounds in a diachronic perspective: The development of a word-formation rule and its semantic instruction. In Proceedings of Mediterranean Morphology Meetings: Morphology and semantics, 138–142, Vol. 91.Google Scholar
2016. Verb-noun compounds in Italian from the 16th century onwards: An increasing exploitation of an available word-formation pattern. Morphology, 26 (2), 109–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terreni, R. 2005. Composti N+N e sintassi: I tipi economici “lista nozze” e “notizia-curiosità”. In M. Grossmann & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), La formazione delle parole. Atti del XXXVII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (L’Aquila, 25–27 settembre 2003), 521–546. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M. 1996. On some phenomena of prosodic morphology in Italian: Accorciamenti, hypocoristics and prosodic delimitation. Probus, 81, 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todaro, G. 2017. Nomi (e aggettivi) che diventano verbi tramite prefissazione: Quel che resta della parasintesi. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Toulouse II – Jean Jaurès / Università degli studi di Roma Tre.Google Scholar
Tollemache, F. 1945. Le parole composte nella lingua italiana. (Vol. 21). Roma: Edizioni Bores di N. Ruffolo.Google Scholar
Villoing, F. 2012. French compounds. Probus, 29–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamboni, A. 1986. Considerazioni sull’it. «andirivieni» e sul relativo tipo composizionale. In K. Lichem, E. Mara & S. Knaller (Eds.), Parallela 2. Aspetti della sintassi dell’italiano contemporaneo. Atti del terzo incontro italo-austriaco di linguisti a Graz, 329–341. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1990. Premesse morfologiche e tipologiche del composto italiano «capinera», «pettirosso». In M. Berretta, P. Molinelli & A. Valentini (Eds), Parallela 4. Morfologia. Atti del V incontro italo-austriaco, 97–109. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar