Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 44:2 (2021) ► pp.204235
References (52)
References
Alshenqeeti, H. 2016. Are Emojis Creating a New or Old Visual Language for New Generations? A Socio-semiotic Study. Advances in language and Literary Studies, 7 : 6, 56–69.Google Scholar
Amaghlobeli, N. 2012. Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2 : 2, 348–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aull, B. 2019. A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication. Internet Pragmatics, 1–34. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. ( 2nd Ed. ) Edited by J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, 900–919.Google Scholar
Baron, N. & Ling, R. 2011. Necessary Smileys & Useless Periods: redefining punctuation in electronically-mediated communication. Visible Language, 45 1, 45–67.Google Scholar
Beißwenger, M. & Pappert, S. 2019. How to be polite with emojis: a pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 : 2, 225–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benenson, F. 2010. Emoji Dick, Lulu.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cougnon, L. A. & Draelants, H. 2018. Language Ideologies and Writing Systems in CMC: a Sociolinguistic Approach. Language and the new (instant) media, Cahiers du Cental, 9 1, 88–99.Google Scholar
Cramer, H., de Juan, P. & Tetreault, J. 2016. Sender-Intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, M. 2016. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Dresner, E. & Herring, S. 2010. Functions of the Non-Verbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionnary Force. Communication Theory, 20 1, 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, C. & Siever, C. M. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets–Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 45 : 2, 256–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. 1973. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33 1, 613–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Chen-Wilson, J., Chadwick, D. & Reynolds, K. 2015. Put on a smiley face: Textspeak and personality perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18 : 3, 147–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldmark, A. 2014. Inside the Mind That Translated Moby Dick into Emoji. New Tech City. Retrieved 27 November 2019 from [URL].
González-Ibáñez, R., Muresan, S. & Wacholder, N. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: shortpapers (ACL-2011).Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gwet, K. L. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability (4th Edition). Chapter 6. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (Ed.) 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2019. The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.). Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions, 25–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C. & Dainas, A. 2017. “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2185–2194. Waikoloa, Hawaii. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. & Daelemans, W. 2016. Expressiveness in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic variation. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities, 30–33.Google Scholar
Janssen, J. H., IJsselsteijn, W. A. & Westerink, J. H. D. M. 2014. How affective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 721 1, 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. & Watts, L. 2015. Characterising the Inventive Appropriation of Emoji as Relationally Meaningful in Mediated Close Personal Relationships. Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design.Google Scholar
Lu, X., Ai, W., Liu, X., Li, Q., Wang, N., Huang, G. & Mei, Q. 2016. Learning from the ubiquitous language: an empirical analysis of emoji usage of smartphone users. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 770–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcoccia, M. & Gauducheau, N. 2007. L’analyse du rôle des smileys en production et en réception: un retour sur la question de l’oralité des écrits numériques. Glottopol. Revue de sociolinguistique en ligne, 10 1, 38–55.Google Scholar
Markman, K. M. & Oshima, S. 2007. Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference, 8 1.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. 2019. Because Internet. Understanding the new rules of language. New York City: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. & Gawne, L. 2018. Emoji grammar as beat gestures. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media, 1–4.Google Scholar
Medlock, B. & McCulloch, G. 2016. The Linguistic Secrets Found in Billions of Emoji. Presented at SXSW, March 11–20, 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2019 from [URL]
Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L. & Hecht, B. 2016. “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji. Proceedings of ICWSM 2016, 259–268.Google Scholar
Na’aman, N., Provenza, H. & Montoya, O. 2017. MojiSem: Varying linguistic purposes of emoji in (Twitter) context. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Student Research Workshop, 136–141.Google Scholar
Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B. & Mozetič, I. 2015. Sentiment of Emojis. PloS One, 10 (12).Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R., Détrie, C., Lopez, C., Moïse, C., Roche, M. & Verine, B. 2016. 88milSMS. A corpus of authentic text messages in French. Banque de corpus CoMeRe. Ortolang: Nancy.Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R. & Frontini, F. 2020. 4 Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text messages. In Visualizing Digital Discourse, 81–104. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panckhurst, R., Lopez, C. & Roche, M. 2020. A French text-message corpus: 88milSMS. Synthesis and usage. Corpus, 20 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Provine, R. R., Spencer, R. & Mandell, D. 2007. Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26 : 3, 299–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampietro, A. 2016. Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats. Lenguas Modernas, 47 1, 91–113.Google Scholar
Schneebeli, C. 2017. The interplay of emojis, emoticons and verbal modalities in CMC: a case study of YouTube comments. VINM 2017: visualizing (in) the new media.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skovholt, K., Grønning, A. & Kankaanranta, A. 2014. The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 1, 780–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spina, S. 2018. Role of Emoticons as Structural Markers in Twitter Interactions. Discourse Processes, 56 : 4, 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, K. 2015 (November 16). Oxford’s 2015 Word of the Year Is This Emoji. Time. Retrieved 15 January 2021 from [URL]
Tang, Y. & Hew, K. F. 2019. Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 13 1, 2457–2483.Google Scholar
Troiano, G. & Nante, N. 2018. Emoji: What does the scientific literature say about them? A new way to communicate in the 21st century. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28 : 4, 528–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unicode. 2019 (October 18). Emoji frequency. The most frequent emoji. Retrieved 16 September 2021 from [URL]
Uygur-Distexhe, D. 2012. Lol, mdr and ptdr. An inclusive and gradual approach to discourse markers. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 35 : 2, 389–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weissman, B. & Tanner, D. 2018. A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLoS ONE 13 (8). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. 1935. The psychobiology of language. Boston: Houghton Miffin.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Carneiro, Marisa
2024. BUY MY EMOJI: AN ANALYSIS OF ADS IN TWITTER/X. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 24 DOI logo
Holtgraves, Thomas
2024. Emoji, Speech Acts, and Perceived Communicative Success. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 43:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Lorenzo Logi
2024. How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Social Semiotics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.