Signaling irony, displaying politeness, replacing words
The eight linguistic functions of emoji in computer-mediated discourse
This paper aims to identify and define the different linguistic functions that emoji can carry in French and English computer-mediated discourse (CMD). Emoji are graphical icons, representing attitudes or concepts, that can be used on any smartphone or computer with a variety of communicative roles inside a conversation. Using a multimodal corpus containing 1200 emoji and the messages in which they were used, we tested an initial typology of emoji functions inspired by previous frameworks. The quantitative analysis of the data, along with the detailed examination of specific examples, led to the construction of a new, more refined typology consisting of three primary functions (expressive, interpretative and referential) and five secondary functions (relational, politeness, emphatic, structural and aesthetic).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The linguistic functions of emoji
- 2.1The expressive function
- 2.2The interpretative function
- 2.3The relational function
- 2.4The politeness function
- 2.5The emphatic function
- 2.6The structural function
- 2.7The referential function
- 2.8Summary
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Corpus
- 3.2Annotation
- 3.3Methods
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Preliminary observations
- 4.2Distribution of emoji functions
- 4.3The influence of internal factors
- 4.3.1Emoji types
- 4.3.2Emoji categories
- 4.3.3Emoji positions
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Review of the initial typology
- 5.2A revised typology of emoji functions
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References
Alshenqeeti, H.
2016 Are Emojis Creating a New or Old Visual Language for New Generations? A Socio-semiotic Study.
Advances in language and Literary Studies,
7
: 6, 56–69.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amaghlobeli, N.
2012 Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies,
2
: 2, 348–354.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, J. L.
1962 How to do things with words. (
2nd Ed.
) Edited by
J. O. Urmson &
M. Sbisà. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H.
2009 Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity.
Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, 900–919.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baron, N. & Ling, R.
2011 Necessary Smileys & Useless Periods: redefining punctuation in electronically-mediated communication.
Visible Language,
45
1, 45–67.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beißwenger, M. & Pappert, S.
2019 How to be polite with emojis: a pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment.
European Journal of Applied Linguistics,
7
: 2, 225–253.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benenson, F.
2010 Emoji Dick, Lulu.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C.
1987 Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cougnon, L. A. & Draelants, H.
2018 Language Ideologies and Writing Systems in CMC: a Sociolinguistic Approach.
Language and the new (instant) media, Cahiers du Cental,
9
1, 88–99.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cramer, H., de Juan, P. & Tetreault, J.
2016 Sender-Intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging.
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danesi, M.
2016 The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dresner, E. & Herring, S.
2010 Functions of the Non-Verbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionnary Force.
Communication Theory,
20
1, 249–268.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dürscheid, C. & Siever, C. M.
2017 Jenseits des Alphabets–Kommunikation mit Emojis.
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik,
45
: 2, 256–285.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J.
1973 The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
33
1, 613–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Chen-Wilson, J., Chadwick, D. & Reynolds, K.
2015 Put on a smiley face: Textspeak and personality perceptions.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,
18
: 3, 147–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldmark, A.
2014 Inside the Mind That Translated Moby Dick into Emoji.
New Tech City. Retrieved 27 November 2019 from
[URL].
González-Ibáñez, R., Muresan, S. & Wacholder, N.
2011 Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look.
Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: shortpapers (ACL-2011).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In
P. Cole &
J. Morgan (Eds.).
Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gwet, K. L.
2014 Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability (4th Edition). Chapter 6. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, S. C.
2001 Computer-mediated discourse. In
D. Tannen,
D. Schiffrin &
H. Hamilton (Eds.),
Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, S. C.
2019 The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In
P. Bou-Franch &
P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.).
Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions, 25–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, S. C. & Dainas, A.
2017 “
Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.
Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2185–2194. Waikoloa, Hawaii.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. & Daelemans, W.
2016 Expressiveness in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic variation.
Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities, 30–33.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janssen, J. H., IJsselsteijn, W. A. & Westerink, J. H. D. M.
2014 How affective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,
721
1, 33–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelly, R. & Watts, L.
2015 Characterising the Inventive Appropriation of Emoji as Relationally Meaningful in Mediated Close Personal Relationships.
Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, X., Ai, W., Liu, X., Li, Q., Wang, N., Huang, G. & Mei, Q.
2016 Learning from the ubiquitous language: an empirical analysis of emoji usage of smartphone users.
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 770–780.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcoccia, M. & Gauducheau, N.
2007 L’analyse du rôle des smileys en production et en réception: un retour sur la question de l’oralité des écrits numériques.
Glottopol. Revue de sociolinguistique en ligne,
10
1, 38–55.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, K. M. & Oshima, S.
2007 Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In
Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference,
8
1.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCulloch, G.
2019 Because Internet. Understanding the new rules of language. New York City: Riverhead Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCulloch, G. & Gawne, L.
2018 Emoji grammar as beat gestures.
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media, 1–4.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medlock, B. & McCulloch, G.
2016 The Linguistic Secrets Found in Billions of Emoji. Presented at SXSW, March 11–20, 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2019 from
[URL]
Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L. & Hecht, B.
2016 “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji.
Proceedings of ICWSM 2016, 259–268.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Na’aman, N., Provenza, H. & Montoya, O.
2017 MojiSem: Varying linguistic purposes of emoji in (Twitter) context.
Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Student Research Workshop, 136–141.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B. & Mozetič, I.
2015 Sentiment of Emojis.
PloS One,
10
(12).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panckhurst, R., Détrie, C., Lopez, C., Moïse, C., Roche, M. & Verine, B.
2016 88milSMS. A corpus of authentic text messages in French.
Banque de corpus CoMeRe. Ortolang: Nancy.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panckhurst, R. & Frontini, F.
2020 4 Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text messages. In
Visualizing Digital Discourse, 81–104. De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panckhurst, R., Lopez, C. & Roche, M.
2020 A French text-message corpus: 88milSMS. Synthesis and usage.
Corpus,
20
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Provine, R. R., Spencer, R. & Mandell, D.
2007 Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
26
: 3, 299–307.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampietro, A.
2016 Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats.
Lenguas Modernas,
47
1, 91–113.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneebeli, C.
2017 The interplay of emojis, emoticons and verbal modalities in CMC: a case study of YouTube comments.
VINM 2017: visualizing (in) the new media.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J.
1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skovholt, K., Grønning, A. & Kankaanranta, A.
2014 The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-).
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
19
1, 780–797.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spina, S.
2018 Role of Emoticons as Structural Markers in Twitter Interactions.
Discourse Processes,
56
: 4, 345–362.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinmetz, K.
2015 (
November 16).
Oxford’s 2015 Word of the Year Is This Emoji.
Time. Retrieved 15 January 2021 from
[URL]
Tang, Y. & Hew, K. F.
2019 Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings.
International Journal of Communication,
13
1, 2457–2483.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Troiano, G. & Nante, N.
2018 Emoji: What does the scientific literature say about them? A new way to communicate in the 21st century.
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,
28
: 4, 528–533.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Unicode
2019 (
October 18).
Emoji frequency. The most frequent emoji. Retrieved 16 September 2021 from
[URL]
Weissman, B. & Tanner, D.
2018 A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension.
PLoS ONE
13
(8).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zipf, G.
1935 The psychobiology of language. Boston: Houghton Miffin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Carneiro, Marisa
2024.
BUY MY EMOJI: AN ANALYSIS OF ADS IN TWITTER/X.
Linguagem em (Dis)curso 24
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Holtgraves, Thomas
2024.
Emoji, Speech Acts, and Perceived Communicative Success.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 43:1
► pp. 83 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.