Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 45:1 (2022) ► pp.83115
Baayen, H.
1993On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of morphology 1992, p. 181–208. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P. & Ramscar, M.
2016Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30 (11), 1174–1220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barca, L., Benedetti, F. & Pezzulo, G.
2016The effects of phonological similarity on the semantic categorisation of pictorial and lexical stimuli: evidence from continuous behavioural measures. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 159–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
1983English word-formation. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y.
1995Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57 (1), 289–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, A.
2001Pathways of lexicalization. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible, Eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, 1596–1608. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Boleda, G.
2020Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 61, 213–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O. & Paperno, D.
2018Inflection vs. derivation in a distributional vector space. Lingue e Linguaggio, 17(2), 173–195.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Thuilier, J.
2019A statistical approach to rivalry in lexeme formation: French-iser and-ifier. Word structure, 12(1), 4–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O. & Tribout, D.
2021Échantinom: a hand-annotated morphological lexicon of French nouns. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology (DeriMo 2021), 33–42, ATILF & CLLE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & Traugott, E. C.
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullinaria, J. A. & Levy, J. P.
2007Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior research methods, 39(3), 510–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B.
2019ordinal — regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2019.12-10. [URL]
Corbin, D.
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M. & Embick, D.
2020Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 1101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Reingold, E. M.
2000Chapter 17 - Do Readers Use Phonological Codes to Activate Word Meanings? Evidence from Eye Movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte, Eds., Reading as a perceptual process, 447–474: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendien, J. & Pierrel, J.-M.
2003Le trésor de la langue française informatisé: un exemple d’ informatisation d’un dictionnaire de langue de référence. Traitement automatique des langues, 44(2), 11–37.Google Scholar
Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P. & Bölte, J.
2004The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 901, 203–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In J. R. Firth, Ed., Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L. & Nisbet, K. A.
2017Processing English compounds: Investigating semantic transparency. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 13 (2), 2–22.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S.
1954Distributional structure. Word, 10 (2–3), 146–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hathout, N., Sajous, F. & Calderone, B.
2014GLÀFF, a Large Versatile French Lexicon. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2019Lexicalization in morphology, In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 1–18. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenhaus, P.
2005Lexicalization and institutionalization. In Handbook of word-formation, 353–373. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. A.
1973Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Kielar, A. & Joanisse, M. F.
2011The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology. Neuropsychologia, 491, 161–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenci, A.
2018Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 41, 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. V.
2016Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G.
2010Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In S. Olsen, Ed., New impulses in word-formation, 212–232. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Lipka, L.
1977Lexikalisierung, idiomatisierung und hypostasierung als probleme einer synchronischen wortbildungslehre. In H. E. Brekle & D. Kastovsky, Eds., Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, 155–164. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar
1992Lexicalization and institutionalization in English and German. Linguistica Pragensia/Akademie Ved CR, Ústav pro Jazyk Ceský, 1–13.Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J. & A. H. P.
2003Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M. & Baroni, M.
2015Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3), 485–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Komisarjevsky Tyler, L., Waksler, R. & Oldername, L.
1994Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. & Segui, J.
1999Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 327–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chan, K., Corrado, G. & Dean, J.
2013Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Scottsdale.Google Scholar
Morris, J., Grainger, J. & Holcomb, P. J.
2013Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research, 15291, 92–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padó, S., Herbelot, A., Kisselew, M. & Šnajder, J.
2016Predictability of distributional semantics in derivational word formation. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, 1285–1296.Google Scholar
Park, J., Sana, F., Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T. L.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. & Lee, H.-W.
2000Chapter 15 - Phonological Coding in Word Perception and Reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte, Eds., Reading as a perceptual process, 339–426. Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2015R: A language and environment for statistical computing.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. & New, B.
2004The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. & Duffy, S. A.
1986Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & cognition, 14(3), 191–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S., McCarthy, D. & Manandhar, S.
2011An empirical study on compositionality in compound nouns. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 210–218. Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D.
1996Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roché, M.
2004Mot construit ? Mot non construit ? Quelques réflexions à partir des dérivés en ‑ier(e). Verbum, 26(2), 459–480.Google Scholar
Sahlgren, M. & Lenci, A.
2016The effects of data size and frequency range on distributional semantic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, R. & Bildhauer, F.
2012Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Uğur Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk & S. Piperidis, Eds., Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’ 12), 486–493. Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Smolka, E. & Libben, G.
2017‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of german compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Libben, G. & Dressler, W. U.
2019When morphological structure overrides meaning: evidence from german prefix and particle verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urieli, A.
2013Robust French Syntax Analysis: reconciling statistical methods and linguistic knowledge in the Talismane toolkit. PhD thesis, University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse.
Varvara, R., Lapesa, G. & Padó, S.
2021Grounding semantic transparency in context. Morphology, 311, 213–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D.
2007Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wauquier, M.
2020Confrontation des procédés dérivationnels et des catégories sémantiques dans les modèles distributionnels. PhD thesis, Université Toulouse 2 – Jean Jaurès.