Article published In:
Retour(s) sur la cataphore
Edited by Anne Theissen and Annie Kuyumcuyan
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 46:1] 2023
► pp. 6288
References

Références

Ariel, M.
1990Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001Accessibility Theory : an overview. In T. Sanders et al. (Eds), Text Representation : Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 29–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1979Pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12, Discourse and Syntax, 289–309. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carden, G.
1982Backwards anaphora in discourse context. Journal of Linguistics, 18 ( 2 ), 361–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combettes, B.
1998Les constructions détachées en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2013Quelques aspects de la subordination en ancien et moyen français. In J.-M. Debaisieux (Ed.), Analyses linguistiques sur corpus. Subordination et insubordination en français, 99–139. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Givon, T.
1983Topic continuity in discourse : an introduction. In T. Givon (Ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. & Hendrick, R.
1997Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 62 1, 325–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1969On pronominalization and the chain of command. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds), Modern Studies in English : Readings in Transformational Grammar, 160–200. Englewoood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C. et al.
2020Grande Grammaire historique du français. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E.
1981Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T.
1981Definite NP-anaphora and c-command domains. Linguistic Inquiry, 121, 605–635.Google Scholar
1983Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Londres: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R.
1969On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds), Modern Studies in English : Readings in Transformational Grammar, 187–200. Englewoood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Seguin, J.-P.
2003Enchaînement et usage du point. In B. Combettes (Ed.), Évolution et variation en français préclassique, 69–137. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Siouffi, G.
2020L’invention de la phrase moderne. In G. Siouffi (Ed.), Une histoire de la phrase française, 171–216. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Trnavac, R. & Tamoada, M.
2016Cataphora, backgrounding and accessibility in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 93 1, 68–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hoek, K.
1995Conceptual reference points: a cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 71 ( 2 ), 310–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar