Structural Subject and Thematic Subject
In the tradition of generative grammar, two different definitions of "subject" have been proposed: we name the first one "structural", since it is based on the constituent structure of the sentence, and the second one "thematic", because it makes use of the concept of thematic role. We argue that both definitions are necessary, since they deal with two different entities, i.e. the structural subject and the thematic subject, which are to be kept distinct. In particular, we show that opacity phenomena are induced by the "thematic" subject, and not by the "structural" one (in showing this, we make use of the notion of "Complete Functional Complex" recently proposed by Chomsky); this kind of analysis allows us to dispense with the so-called "i-within-i condition", which appears theoretically unsound. Some cases of behavior of anaphors which seem to run against our proposal are also discussed, and it is shown that they can be accounted for on the basis of independent principles.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Moro, Andrea
2020.
The geometry of predication: a configurational derivation of the defining property of clause structure.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375:1791
► pp. 20190310 ff.

Burzio, Luigi
1996.
The Role of the Antecedent in Anaphoric Relations. In
Current Issues in Comparative Grammar [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35],
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.