Cover not available
Article published In:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 240–255

The system of intensifying prefixes in Modern Greek

| Democritus University of Thrace
Adverbs functioning as degree modifiers are not the only devices used for positive scaling; cross-linguistically, another very common means of intensification is the prefixation. This paper is concerned with data of nine intensifying prefixes of Modern Greek ( arxi‑ ‘archi’, θeο‑ ‘god’, kata‑ ‘over’, pan‑ ‘all’, olo‑ ‘whole’, para‑ ‘over’, pend(a)‑ ‘five’, xilio‑ ‘thousand’, iper‑ ‘hyper’) that constitute a representative sample of Greek intensifying prefixes. The purpose of this paper is to account for prefix-base combinations, taking into consideration the semantic typology of gradable predicates of Kennedy & McNally (2005) and more precisely focusing on the question of how the open or closed scale on which the bases map their arguments relates to intensifying prefix-base combinations. Our aim is to arrive at a general conceptual framework that can analyze all cases of intensifying prefixes. The paper also aims to account for the polysemy found in intensifying prefixes.
Keywords: intensification, evaluative morphology, degree words, open scales, scalar predicates, closed scales
Published online: 22 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.04gav
References (27)
Amiot, D. (2004). Haut degré et préfixation. In F. Lefeuvre, & M. Noailly (Eds.), Intensité, Comparaison, Degré, Travaux linguistiques du CERLICO 17 (pp. 91–104). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
. (2012). De la localisation à l’évaluation : des verbes préfixés évaluatifs au sens bien particulier. Corela ‑ Numéros thématiques | Langue, espace, cognition. Available at [URL].
Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree words. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delveroudi, R., & Vassilaki, S. (1999). Préfixes d’intensité en grec moderne : para‑, kata‑, poly‑, et olo-. In Les opérations de détermination-Quantification / Qualification (pp. 149–167). Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (1994). A hyperinflation of lexical mega-monsters? Eine korpusgestützte Analyse zum Gebrauch der Wortbildungselemente mega‑, ultra‑, super‑ und hyper‑ im heutigen Englisch. Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 191, 83–111.Google Scholar
Goutsos, D. (2010). The corpus of Greek texts: A reference corpus for Modern Greek. Corpora, 5(1), 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar.
Grandi, N. (2002). Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Guilbert, L., & Dubois, J. (1961). Formation du système préfixal intensif en français moderne et contemporain. Le français moderne, 291, 87–111.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1992). Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 11 (pp. 290–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar.
Κennedy, C., & Mc Nally, L. (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 811, 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar.
Kennedy, C., & Mc Nally, L. (2009). Color, context and compositionality. Synthese, 174(1), 79–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, U. (2008). Booster prefixes in Old English – an alternative view of the roots of the ME forsooth. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2): 245–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach (2nd edn.). Munich: Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Martin-Garcia, J. (1998). Los prefijos intensivos de espanol: caracterizacion morfosemantica. E.L.U.A, 121, 103–116.Google Scholar
Montero-Curiel, M-L. (1998). Los prefijos ex‑ y extra‑ en espanol. Annuario de Estudios Filologicos, XXI1, 243–255.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2002). Prefixation vs. compounding: The case of Greek preverbs. In A.M. Di Sciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, Vol. 2: Morphology (pp. 37–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar.
. (2004). Stem-based versus word-based morphological configurations: The case of modern Greek preverbs. Lingue e Linguaggio, 21, 241–275.Google Scholar
Valetopoulos, F. (2004). L’intensité absolue des adjectifs en grec. In F. Lefeuvre, & M. Noailly (Eds.), Intensité, Comparaison, Degré, Travaux linguistiques du CERLICO 17 (pp. 105–116). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Αναστασιάδη-Συμεωνίδη, A. (1986). Η νεολογία στην κοινή νεοελληνική [Neology in modern Greek]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Α.Π.Θ.Google Scholar
. (2008). Το μόρφημα θεο‑ στην Ελληνική [The morpheme theo‑ in Greek]. Στο Γλώσσης χάριν. Τόμος αφιερωμένος από τον Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας στον Καθηγητή Γεώργιο Μπαμπινιώτη (pp. 99–113). Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα.Google Scholar
Γαβριηλίδου, Ζ. (2013). Όψεις Επίτασης στη Νέα Ελληνική [Aspects of Intensity in Modern Greek]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Κυριακίδης.Google Scholar
Γιαννουλοπούλου, Γ. (2003). Μορφήματα στα όρια ανάμεσα στην παραγωγή και τη σύνθεση. Η περίπτωση των θεο‑, ψιλο‑ και φέρνω [Morphemes at the interface of derivation and composition. The case of theo‑, psilo‑ and ferno]. Πρακτικά του 6ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου Ελληνικής Γλωσσολογίας. Ρέθυμνο. (διαθέσιμο στο [URL]).
Ευθυμίου, Α. (2001). Το νεοελληνικό πρόθημα ξε-: οι έννοιες της απομάκρυνσης και της αλλαγής κατάστασης [The Modern Greek prefix kse-: the notions of separation and change of state]. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα, 211, 202–213.Google Scholar
. (2002). Προθήματα ή α΄ συνθετικά που δηλώνουν επίταση στη νέα ελληνική [Prefixes and parts of compounds denoting intensification]. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα, 231, 519–528.Google Scholar
Σαββίδου, Π. (2012). Μετριασμός και επίταση με τη χρήση των μορφημάτων ψιλο‑ και θεό: ανάλυση σε σώματα κειμένων [Attenuation and Intensification with psilo‑ and theo-: analysis in corpora], In Z. Gavriilidou, A. Eftymiou, P. Kambaki, & E. Thomadaki (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 10th International Conference in Greek Linguistics, Komotini, Democritus University of Thrace. (διαθέσιμο στο [URL])
Συμεωνίδης, X. (1984). Συμβολή στην ερμηνεία των νεοελληνικών συνθέτων με πρώτο συνθετικό το θεο‑ [A contribution to the interpretation on Modern Greek compound with theo-]. Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα, 51, 111–119.Google Scholar
Φωτίου, Νίκος. 1998. Προθηματική μεγέθυνση και επίταση στη νέα ελληνική [Magnification and Intensification with prefixes in Modern Greek]. Μεταπτυχιακή εργασία. Θεσσαλονίκη: Α.Π.Θ.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Koutsoukos, Nikos & Angeliki Efthymiou
2023. Derivational morphology in Modern Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.