Article published In:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexiconEdited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 275–289
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 275–289
What drives morphological change?
A case study from the history of German
This paper investigates the role of syntactic, semantic, and lexical factors in the diachronic development of German nominalization patterns. Drawing on an extensive corpus analysis of Early New High German and New High German texts, it is shown that (a) deverbal nominals in the suffix -ung tend to develop more reified meaning variants, which is reflected in the syntactic patterns in which the word-formation products preferentially occur, and (b) infinitival nominalization becomes more productive and is established as the new default word-formation pattern deriving nouns from verbs. These considerations fit in neatly with a cognitively-oriented theory of word-formation change situated in the framework of Construction Grammar.
References (25)
Barz, I. (1998). Zur Lexikalisierungspotenz nominalisierter Infinitive. In I. Barz, & G. Öhlschläger (Eds.), Zwischen Grammatik und Lexikon (pp. 57–68). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 
Booij, G. E. (2002). Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 141, 301–327.
. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Demske, U. (2000). Zur Geschichte der ung-Nominalisierung im Deutschen. Ein Wandel morphologischer Produktivität. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 1221, 365–411.
Dressler, W. U. (1987). Word-formation (WF) as part of natural morphology. In W. U. Dressler (Ed.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology (pp. 99–125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Durrell, M., Ensslin, A., & Bennett, P. (2007). The GerManC Project. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung, 311, 71–80.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartmann, S. (forthcoming) “Nominalization” taken literally. A diachronic corpus study of German nominalization patterns. To appear in: Italian Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue “New Territories in Word-Formation”.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction Grammar and its application to english. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora. Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 241, 385–401.
Hollmann, W. B. (2013). Nouns and verbs in Cognitive Grammar. Where is the ‘sound’ evidence? Cognitive Linguistics, 241, 275–308.
Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
Kastovsky, D. (1986). Diachronic word-formation in a functional perspective. In D. Kastovsky, & A. Szwedek (Eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. vol. 1: Linguistic theory and historical linguistics (pp. 409–421). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nübling, D., Dammel, A., Duke, J., & Szczepaniak, R. (2013). Historische Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen. Eine Einführung in die Prinzipien des Sprachwandels (4th ed.). Tübingen: Narr.
Vogel, P. M. (1996). Wortarten und Wortartenwechsel. Zur Konversion und verwandten Erscheinungen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Scherer, C. (2006). Was ist Wortbildungswandel? Linguistische Berichte, 2051, 3–28.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions. Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 81, 209–243.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thielmann, W. (2007). Substantiv. In L. Hoffmann (Ed.), Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten (pp. 791–822). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Werner, M. (2012). Genus, Derivation und Quantifikation. Zur Funktion der Suffigierung und verwandter Phänomene im Deutschen. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.