Article published In:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 306321
References (20)
Bianchi, C. (Ed.). 2004. The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2), 406–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. 1979. The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. 2000. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition (pp. 99–115). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enger, H. 2004. Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 271, 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 36(3), 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), 391–428.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. 2007. Agreeing to disagree: Agreement with non-agreeing antecedents, with focus on Sanskrit and Latin. Presentation at East Coast Indo-European Conference, Yale University, June 2007.
Hoffner, H., & Melchert, H. C. 2008. Hittite grammar. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A., & Joseph, B. D. 2014. Limiting the power of zero: Agreement with Sanskrit elliptic duals. Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN, January 4, 2014.
Joseph, B. D.1979. On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics, 171, 519–23.Google Scholar
Kathol, A. 1999. Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In R. D. Levine, & G. M. Green (Eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar (pp. 223–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 2010. Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language, 86(2), 302–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliphant, S. G. 1912. The Vedic dual: Part VI, the elliptic dual; Part VII, the dual dvandva. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 321, 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 2013. Что дѣлать? what is to be done? Plenary talk at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 4 January 2013.
Szabo, Z. 2005. Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 2008. Semantics versus pragmatics. Encyclopaedia of the linguistic sciences: Issues and theories. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. 1987. Phonologically conditioned agreement and purely morphological features. Technical report UCSC Syntax Research Center, Report SRC-87-06.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Corbett, Greville G.
2023. The Agreement Hierarchy and (generalized) semantic agreement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.