Article published in:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 338352
Bybee, J
(1988) Morphology as lexical organisation. In M. Hammond, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches to modern linguistics (pp. 119–142). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R
(2010) Morphological structure in native and non native language processing. Language Learning, 601, 21–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, D
(1987/1991) Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique, vol. 21. Tübingen / Villeneuve d’Ascq: Max Niemeyer Verlag / Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
(1991) Introduction - La formation des mots : structures et interprétations. Lexique, 101, 7–30.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L
(2010) “Fell” primes “fall” but does “bell” prime “ball”? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dal Maso, S., & Giraudo, H
(2014) Masked morphological priming in Italian L2: Evidence from masked priming. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, this volume. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E
(2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M
(2011) Masked translation priming effects with low proficient bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 39(2), 260–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H
(2005) A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 201, 7–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P
(1995) Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 211, 1098–1116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F
(2009) Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: An exception to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 16(4), 684–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C
(2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods: Instruments & Computers, 351, 116–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I
(1999) The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 681, 5–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J
(2003) The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita, & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3–37). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J
(2001) Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 127–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Voga, M
(2013) Prefix units in the mental lexicon. In N. Hathout, F. Montermini, & J. Tseng (Eds.), Morphology in Toulouse. Selected Proceedings of Decembrettes 7. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 51 (pp. 91–107).Google Scholar
Gollan, T., Forster, K. I., & Frost, R
(1997) Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 231, 1122–1139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D
(2010) Understanding morphology (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 1011, 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B
(2002) Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 281, 244–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J. & Feldman, L. B
(2009) Boats prime float but coats don’t: Priming from non-morphological form and meaning similarities invites a computational account of morphological processing. The Mental Lexicon, 4(1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, Ch., & Marinis, Th
(2013) Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 167–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 942–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 111, 1090–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raveh, M
(2002) The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Brain & Language, 811, 312–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rehak, K. & Juffs, A
(2011) Native and non-native processing of morphologically complex English words: Testing the influence of derivational prefixes. In G. Granena, J. Koeth, S. Lee-Ellis, A. Lukyanchenko, G.P. Botana, & E. Rhoades (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 125–142). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F
(1997) Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory & Language, 36(3), 382–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Casas, R., & García-Albea, J. E
(2005) The representation of cognate and noncognate words on bilingual memory. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 226–250). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H
(1997) How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 118–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H
(2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 111, 245–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I
(1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed word. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voga, M
(2005) Amorçage masqué cognate inter-alphabet: rôle des facteurs morphologique et phonologique. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 191, 407–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Cognateness and translation priming: The role of the orthographic cue and etymology through two Greek-French experiments (in Greek). Studies in Greek Linguistics, 341, 104–125.Google Scholar
forthcoming). Towards a supra-lexical representation of morphology in the bilingual lexicon : Greek-French masked priming data (in Greek). Studies in Greek Linguistics.
Voga, M., & Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, A
(2012) Competition and morphological family size: Evidence from monolinguals (Greek) and bilinguals (Greek-French). Paper presented at the workshop Exo-lexical variables in monolingual and bilingual morphological processing, IMM15 (International Morphology Meeting), 9-12 February, Vienna.
Voga, M., Giraudo, H., & Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, A
(2012) Differential processing effects within 2nd group Modern Greek verbs. Lingue e Linguaggio, 21, 215–234.Google Scholar
Voga, M., & Grainger, J
(2007) Cognate status and cross-script translation priming. Memory and Cognition, 351, 938–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Masked morphological priming with varying levels of form overlap: Evidence from Greek verbs. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 13(2).Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Bordag, Denisa & Andreas Opitz
2021. REPRESENTATION AND PROCESSING OF OVERTLY IDENTICAL COMPLEX FORMS IN L1 AND L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bosch, Sina & Harald Clahsen
2016. Accessing Morphosyntax in L1 and L2 Word Recognition. The Mental Lexicon 11:1  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Gunnar Jacob & Niels O. Schiller
2019. Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226482 ff. Crossref logo
Clahsen, Harald & Anna Jessen
2020. Variability and its limits in bilingual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon 15:2  pp. 295 ff. Crossref logo
Clahsen, Harald & Jana Reifegerste
2017.  In Bilingualism [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 6],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Clahsen, Harald & João Veríssimo
2016. Investigating grammatical processing in bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:5  pp. 685 ff. Crossref logo
Clahsen, Harald & João Veríssimo
2019.  In Bilingualism, Executive Function, and Beyond [Studies in Bilingualism, 57],  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Dal Maso, Serena & Hélène Giraudo
2014. Morphological processing in L2 Italian. Lingvisticae Investigationes 37:2  pp. 322 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Do late bilinguals access pure morphology during word recognition? A masked-priming study on Hebrew as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:5  pp. 945 ff. Crossref logo
Freynik, Suzanne, Kira Gor & Polly O’Rourke
2017. L2 processing of Arabic derivational morphology. The Mental Lexicon 12:1  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Gao, Fei, Jianqin Wang, Cecilia Guanfang Zhao & Zhen Yuan
2021. Word or morpheme? Investigating the representation units of L1 and L2 Chinese compound words in mental lexicon using a repetition priming paradigm. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Giraudo, Hélène & Serena Dal Maso
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 603 ff. Crossref logo
Gor, Kira, Anna Chrabaszcz & Svetlana Cook
2017. Processing of native and nonnative inflected words: Beyond affix stripping. Journal of Memory and Language 93  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Gor, Kira, Anna Chrabaszcz & Svetlana Cook
2018. Early and late learners decompose inflected nouns, but can they tell which ones are inflected correctly?. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:1  pp. 106 ff. Crossref logo
Gor, Kira, Anna Chrabaszcz & Svetlana Cook
2019. A case for agreement. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Morphological priming in bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:3  pp. 443 ff. Crossref logo
Jacob, Gunnar, Vera Heyer & João Veríssimo
2018. Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:6  pp. 619 ff. Crossref logo
Kimppa, Lilli, Yury Shtyrov, Suzanne C.A. Hut, Laura Hedlund, Miika Leminen & Alina Leminen
2019. Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex 116  pp. 74 ff. Crossref logo
Lõo, Kaidi, Abigail Toth, Figen Karaca & Juhani Järvikivi
2022. Morphological processing is gradient not discrete in L1 and L2 English masked priming. The Mental Lexicon Crossref logo
2019. Persistent differences between native speakers and late bilinguals: Evidence from inflectional and derivational processing in older speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3  pp. 425 ff. Crossref logo
Safaie, Ebrahim
2021. Sensitivity to Regular and Irregular Past Tense Morphology in Native Speakers and Second Language Learners of English: Evidence From Intermediate-to-Advanced Persian Speakers of L2 English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:5  pp. 1107 ff. Crossref logo
Voga, Madeleine, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Traitement bilingue inter-alphabet et morphologie : le rôle des variables paradigmatiques dans l’amorçage masqué grec-français. SHS Web of Conferences 78  pp. 08001 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.