Article published In:
Lexical plurals and beyond
Edited by Peter Lauwers and Marie Lammert
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39:2] 2016
► pp. 234252
References
Acquaviva, P
(2008a) Lexical Plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008b) Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. [URL].
Alexiadou, A
(2011) Plural mass nouns and the morpo-syntax of number. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 33–41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bale, A. C. & Barner, D
(2009) The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, M
(2013) Collective mass affixes: When derivation restricts functional structure. Lingua, 1261, 32–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H
(2005) Structuring Sense vol 1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G
(1998) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghianiabadi, S
(2012) Plural marking beyond count nouns. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass across languages (pp. 112–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A
(1993) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H
(2009) Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp. 129–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P
(1973) "Elsewhere" in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 93–106). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kramer, R
(2014) Gender in amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences, 431, 102–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, B. & Gwynn, J
(1985) A Grammar of Modern Telugu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, I
(2016) DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 341, 975–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, F
(1989a) Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy, 121, 559–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989b) Groups, II. Linguistics and Philosophy, 121, 723–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Link, G
(1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. In C. S. R. Bäuerle & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 127–144). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, E
(2012) Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), 650–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojeda, A
(2005) The paradox of mass plurals. In E. F. Salikoko Mufwene & R. Wheeler (Eds.), Polymorphous Linguistics: Jim McCawley’s Legacy (pp. 389–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ponamgi, R
(2012) Quantification in Telugu. In E. Keenan & D. Paperno (Eds.), Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language (pp. 781–843). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E
(1991) Two functional categories in noun-phrases: Evidence from modern hebrew. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure, volume 26 of Syntax and semantics (pp. 37–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R
(2011) Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In B. S. Suzi Lima & Kevin Mullin (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS39 (pp. 661–678).Google Scholar
Smith, P. W
(2015) Feature mismatches: Consequences for syntax, morphology and semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
Solt, S
(2009) The semantics of adjectives of quantity. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Tsoulas, G
(2007) On the grammar of number and mass terms in greek. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 491, 239–266.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M
(2008) The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 261, 639–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N. N
(2012) Countability and numeral classifiers in mandarin chinese. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass across languages (pp. 220–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Acquaviva, Paolo & Laure Gardelle
2023. Pluralia tantumandsingularia tantum. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties. Morphology 29:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Jaradat, Abdulazeez
2023. When a Dual Marker Acts as a Paucal Marker: The Case of the Dual -e:n in Northern Rural Jordanian Arabic. Languages 8:3  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.