The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article uns and its relationship with lexical
plurality in medieval French
The indefinite plural article uns in medieval French conjoins the features of unity and
plurality. Because of its grammatical nature, uns is not restricted to lexical plurals, but combines in a
productive way to nouns having a regular singular-plural alternation in order to create a complex referent not reducible to the
sum of its components. Moreover, uns expresses not only quantitative unity ‘one single N’, but also qualitative
unity ‘one same N’ and is not linked to lexical plurality in the latter case. Since its features of unity and plurality are
considered as incompatible, plural indefinite articles have been assumed to emerge in an advanced stage of grammaticalization,
when the numeral source meaning is bleached out, and to be not viable over time. Both hypotheses were invalidated in the present
study.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1In search of grammatical markers of lexical plurality
- 1.2Outline
- 1.3Empirical data
- 2.The different stages of grammaticalization of the indefinite article and the emergence of the plural form
- 2.1The grammaticalization process of un and its stage of development in Old French: a new model
- 2.2The plural indefinite article in the double-path model of the grammaticalization process
- 3.The conditions of use of the plural indefinite article
- 3.1Unity versus plurality
- 3.2A typology of the uses of the plural indefinite article in medieval French
- 3.2.1Qualitative uses of the indefinite plural article
- 3.2.2Quantitative uses of the indefinite plural article
- 3.2.3Statistical data concerning the conditions of use of the indefinite plural article in the 12th and 13th C
- 3.2.3.1Qualitative versus quantitative use
- 3.2.3.2The relative weight of the different features conditioning the quantitative use
- 3.3The plural form of the indefinite article: a grammatical marker of lexical plural?
- 3.4Fossilization and death of the indefinite article in the 15th C
- 3.5The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article
- 4.Why does the plural form of the indefinite article disappear?
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Author queries
-
References
References (33)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical
plurals. A morphosemantic
approach. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buridant, C. (2000). Grammaire
nouvelle de l’ancien
français. Paris: SEDES.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buridant, C. (2015). Unes
manieres de … L’indéfini pluriel uns/unes en français médiéval : nouvel aperçu en perspective
romane », In R. Bellon (Ed.), Études
de linguistique médiévale. Hommage à Ambroise Jean-Marc
Queffélec (pp. 61–76). Bern: Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (1994). Against
split morphology. Yearbook of Morphology
1993, 27–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlier, A. (2001). La
genèse de l’article un
. Langue
française, 1301, 65–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlier, A. (2013). Grammaticalization
in progress in old French: Indefinite articles. In D. Arteaga (Ed.), Research
on old French: The state of the
art (pp. 45–60). Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlier, A., & Combettes B. (2015). Typologie
et catégorisation morphosyntaxique: du latin au français moderne. Langue
française, 1871,15–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collin, M. (1982). L’article
indéfini dans la traduction par Jean d’Antioche du ‘De Inventione’ de Cicéron. Master
Thesis., Univ. of Leuven.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foulet, L. (1998). Petite
Syntaxe de l'ancien Français (3e
éd.). Paris: Champion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geisler, H. (1982). Studien
zur typologischen Entwicklung: Lateinisch, Altfranzösisch,
Neufranzösisch. München: Fink.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T. (1981). On
the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica
Historica, 2(1), 35–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gréa, Ph. (2013). Deux-trois
mots sur les déterminants de petite quantité: pluriel continu et perception sémantique. Journal
of French Language
Studies, 231, 193–219. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guillaume, G. (1969). Langage
et science du
langage. Paris: Nizet.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why
is grammaticalization
irreversible? Linguistics, 371, 1043–1068. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B. (1997). Indefinite
articles. In B. Heine (Ed.), Cognitive
foundations of
grammar (pp. 66–82). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herslund, M. (2003). Le
pluriel de l’article indéfini en ancien français. In P. Blumenthal, & J-E. Tyvaert (Eds.), La
Cognition dans le
temps (pp. 75–84). Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laca, B., & Tasmowski, L. (1994). Référentialité
du pluriel indéfini dans les langues romanes. Faits de
langues, 41, 97–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K. (1986). Topic,
focus, and the grammar of spoken French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lauwers, P. (2014). Les
pluriels ‘lexicaux’. Typologie quantifiée des déficits de dénombrabilité. Langue
française, 1831, 117–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts
on grammaticalization. München, Newcastle: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchello-Nizia, C. (1997). La
langue française aux XIVe et XVe
siècles. Paris: Colin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinkster, H. (1988). Sicut
unus pater familias: opmerkingen over het gebruik van ille en unus in verband met de ontwikkeling in de Romaanse
talen. ([URL])![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, S. (2003). La
grammaticalisation: unidirectionnalité et statut. Le français
moderne, 711, 144–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, S. (2015). Recul
de la non-expression et de l’inversion du sujet pronominal du 12e au 14e
siècle. In A. Carlier, M. Goyens, & B. Lamiroy (Eds.), Le
français en
diachonie (pp. 431–460). Bern: Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word
and object. Cambridge Ms.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramat, P. (1992). Thoughts
on
degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 301, 549–560. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winter-Froemel, E.. (2012). Les
changements sémantiques et les ambiguïtés au niveau du discours: l’exemple du fr. on, Actes du
CMLF 20121, pp. 247–259.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woledge, B.. (1956). The
plural of the indefinite article in Old French. Modern Language
Review 511, 17–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Alexiadou, Artemis
2024.
Double plural marking and the building blocks of nominals.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Acquaviva, Paolo & Laure Gardelle
2023.
Pluralia tantumandsingularia tantum. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.