Cover not available
Article published In:
Lexical plurals and beyond
Edited by Peter Lauwers and Marie Lammert
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39:2] 2016
► pp. 309–334

The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article uns and its relationship with lexical plurality in medieval French

| University of Lille | CNRS UMR STL |

The indefinite plural article uns in medieval French conjoins the features of unity and plurality. Because of its grammatical nature, uns is not restricted to lexical plurals, but combines in a productive way to nouns having a regular singular-plural alternation in order to create a complex referent not reducible to the sum of its components. Moreover, uns expresses not only quantitative unity ‘one single N’, but also qualitative unity ‘one same N’ and is not linked to lexical plurality in the latter case. Since its features of unity and plurality are considered as incompatible, plural indefinite articles have been assumed to emerge in an advanced stage of grammaticalization, when the numeral source meaning is bleached out, and to be not viable over time. Both hypotheses were invalidated in the present study.

Keywords: lexical plural, indefinite article, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1In search of grammatical markers of lexical plurality
    • 1.2Outline
    • 1.3Empirical data
  • 2.The different stages of grammaticalization of the indefinite article and the emergence of the plural form
    • 2.1The grammaticalization process of un and its stage of development in Old French: a new model
    • 2.2The plural indefinite article in the double-path model of the grammaticalization process
  • 3.The conditions of use of the plural indefinite article
    • 3.1Unity versus plurality
    • 3.2A typology of the uses of the plural indefinite article in medieval French
      • 3.2.1Qualitative uses of the indefinite plural article
      • 3.2.2Quantitative uses of the indefinite plural article
      • 3.2.3Statistical data concerning the conditions of use of the indefinite plural article in the 12th and 13th C
        • 3.2.3.1Qualitative versus quantitative use
        • 3.2.3.2The relative weight of the different features conditioning the quantitative use
    • 3.3The plural form of the indefinite article: a grammatical marker of lexical plural?
    • 3.4Fossilization and death of the indefinite article in the 15th C
    • 3.5The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article
  • 4.Why does the plural form of the indefinite article disappear?
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Author queries
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.2.06car
References
Acquaviva, P
(2008) Lexical plurals. A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Buridant, C
(2000) Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar
(2015) Unes manieres de … L’indéfini pluriel uns/unes en français médiéval : nouvel aperçu en perspective romane », In R. Bellon (Ed.), Études de linguistique médiévale. Hommage à Ambroise Jean-Marc Queffélec (pp. 61–76). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Booij, G
(1994) Against split morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 27–50.Google Scholar
Carlier, A
(2001) La genèse de l’article un . Langue française, 1301, 65–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) From preposition to article: The grammaticalization of the French partitive. Studies in Language, 311, 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammaticalization in progress in old French: Indefinite articles. In D. Arteaga (Ed.), Research on old French: The state of the art (pp. 45–60). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, A., & Combettes B
(2015) Typologie et catégorisation morphosyntaxique: du latin au français moderne. Langue française, 1871,15–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collin, M
(1982) L’article indéfini dans la traduction par Jean d’Antioche du ‘De Inventione’ de Cicéron. Master Thesis., Univ. of Leuven.Google Scholar
Corbett, G
(2000) Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O
(2000) Grammaticalization: Uni-directional, non-reversable. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach, & D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, L
(1998) Petite Syntaxe de l'ancien Français (3e éd.). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Geisler, H
(1982) Studien zur typologischen Entwicklung: Lateinisch, Altfranzösisch, Neufranzösisch. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Givón, T
(1981) On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica, 2(1), 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gréa, Ph
(2013) Deux-trois mots sur les déterminants de petite quantité: pluriel continu et perception sémantique. Journal of French Language Studies, 231, 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, G
(1969) Langage et science du langage. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M
(1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 371, 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B
(1997) Indefinite articles. In B. Heine (Ed.), Cognitive foundations of grammar (pp. 66–82). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Herslund, M
(2003) Le pluriel de l’article indéfini en ancien français. In P. Blumenthal, & J-E. Tyvaert (Eds.), La Cognition dans le temps (pp. 75–84). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Laca, B., & Tasmowski, L
(1994) Référentialité du pluriel indéfini dans les langues romanes. Faits de langues, 41, 97–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1986) Topic, focus, and the grammar of spoken French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lauwers, P
(2014) Les pluriels ‘lexicaux’. Typologie quantifiée des déficits de dénombrabilité. Langue française, 1831, 117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C
(1982) Thoughts on grammaticalization. München, Newcastle: Lincom.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C
(1997) La langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H
(1988) Sicut unus pater familias: opmerkingen over het gebruik van ille en unus in verband met de ontwikkeling in de Romaanse talen. ([URL])Google Scholar
Prévost, S
(2003) La grammaticalisation: unidirectionnalité et statut. Le français moderne, 711, 144–166.Google Scholar
(2015) Recul de la non-expression et de l’inversion du sujet pronominal du 12e au 14e siècle. In A. Carlier, M. Goyens, & B. Lamiroy (Eds.), Le français en diachonie (pp. 431–460). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O
(1960) Word and object. Cambridge Ms.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, P
(1992) Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 301, 549–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
(1988) Oats and wheat: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In Wierzbicka, A. (Ed.), The semantics of grammar (pp. 499–560). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter-Froemel, E.
(2012) Les changements sémantiques et les ambiguïtés au niveau du discours: l’exemple du fr. on, Actes du CMLF 20121, pp. 247–259.Google Scholar
Woledge, B.
(1956) The plural of the indefinite article in Old French. Modern Language Review 511, 17–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar