Review published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 4:2 (1980) ► pp. 420430
References
Bense, Max
1967Semiotik: Allgemeine Theorie der Zeichen, Baden-Baden: Agis.Google Scholar
Bense, Max; Walther, Elisabeth
1973Wörterbuch der Semiotik, Koln: Kiebn-heuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques
1971La parole malheureuse. De Valchimie linguistique à lagrammairephilosophique, Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
1973Wittgenstein: La rime et la raison. Science, ethique et esthetique, Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
1976Le my the de Vinteriorite. Experience, signification et langage prive chez Wittgenstein, Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
Buyssens, Eric
1943Les langages et le discours. Essaide linguistique fonction-nelle dans le cadre de la semiologie, Bruxelles: Lebegue (repris dans: Buyssens 1967, La communication et Varticulation linguistique, Bruxelles: Presses univ.).Google Scholar
Caws, Peter
ed. 1980Two Centuries of Philosophy in America, London: Black-well.Google Scholar
De Pater, Wim
1970Taalanalytische perspektieven op godsdienst en kunst, Antwerpen: Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1967La voix et le phenomene. Introduction au probleme du signe dans la phenomenologie de Husserl, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael
1973Frege. Philosophy of Language, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1973Il segno, Mifano: Isedi.Google Scholar
1974Closing Statement at the First Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Le Journal canadien de recherche semiotique 2:2, 7–16.Google Scholar
1976A Theory of Semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978Semiotics: A Discipline or an Interdisciplinary Method? in Sebeoked 1978: 73–89.Google Scholar
Eschbach, Achim
1974Zeichen – Text – Bedeutung: Bibliographie zur Theo- rie und Praxis der Semiotik, Munchen: Fink.Google Scholar
Faccani, Remo; Eco, Umberto
eds. 1969I sistemi di segni e lo strutturalismo sovietico, Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 1001: 25–50 (repris dans G. Frege, Funktion, Begriff Bedeutung. FiXnf logische studien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1975 4: 40–65).Google Scholar
Garroni, Emilio
1972Progetto di semiotica, Ban: Laterza.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson
1968Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill C°.Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J. et al.
eds. 1970Sign, Language and Culture, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre
1971La semiologie, Paris: PUF (1973 2; trad. angl. Semiology 1975, London – Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Henault, Anne
1979Les enjeux de la semiotique. Introduction a la semiotique generate, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hrushovski, Benjamin; Even-Zohar, Itamar
1972A Short Hebrew-English – French – German – Russian Dictionary of Terms in Semiotics, Semantics and Allied Fields, Hasifrut, Quarterly for the Study of Literature 31: 412–26.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
ed. 1964Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1975Coup d’oeil sur le developpement de la semiotique, Bloomington: RCLSS.Google Scholar
Janik, Allan; Toulmin, Stephen
1973Wittgenstein’s Vienna, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Klemke, E. D.
ed. 1968Essays on Frege, Urbana – Chicago – London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1978Western Histories of Linguistic Thought. An annotated chronological bibliography 1822–1976, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins B.V. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Victor
1950Der Wiener Kreis. Der Ursprung des Neopositivismus. Ein Kapitel derjüngsten Philosophiegeschichte, Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul
1972Naming and Necessity in D. Davidson & G. Harman eds. Semantics of Natural Language: 253–355,765–69, Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification? in G. Evans & J. Mc Do well eds. Truth and Meaning. Essays in Semantics: 325–419, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia; Rey-Debove, Josette; Umiker, Donna Jean
eds. 1971Essays in Semiotics /Essais de semiotique, The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linsky, Leonard
1977Names and Descriptions, Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij
1973Semiotika kino i problemi kinoestetiki, Tallin: Eesti Raamat.Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij; Uspenskij, Boris
eds. 1973Ricerche semiotische: Nuove tenden- ze delle scienze umane nell’ URSS, Turino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Tomas
1961Beitrag zur Terminologie der Semiotik, Ulm: Ebner.Google Scholar
Martinet, Jeanne
1973Clefs pour la semiologie, Paris: Seghers.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles
1971Writings on the General Theory of Signs, The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard
1974Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague (edited by R. Thomason), New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges
1970Introduction a la semiologie, Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques
1973Quelques problemes de la semiologie fonctionnelle, Semiotica 91: 157–90.Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried
1975Semiotik: Fine Einfuhrung mit Beispielen fur Reklame- analysen, Tubingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pelc, Jerzy
1971Studies in Functional Logical Semiotics of Natural Languages, The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1974The Development of Polish Semiotics in the Post-War Years, Semiotica 101: 369–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platts, Mark
ed. 1980Reference, Truth and Reality. Essays on the Philosophy of Language, London – Boston – Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prieto, Luis J.
1968La semiologie, Encyclopedic de la Pleiade: Le langage: 93–144, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary
1975Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge – London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rector, Monica
1974Glossario di semiotica, Vozes 681: 5–17.Google Scholar
Rey, Alain
1973Theories du signe etdu sens. Lectures I, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard
ed. 1967The Linguistic Turn. Recent Essays in Philosophical Method, Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schleichert, H.
ed. 1975Logischer Empirismus. Der Wiener Kreis, Munchen: Fink.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas
1972Perspectives in Zoosemiotics, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1976Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
ed. 1974Current Trends in Linguistics. Vol. 12: Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
ed. 1975The Tell-Tale Sign. A Survey of Semiotics, Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
ed. 1977A Perfusion of Signs, Bloomington – London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
ed. 1978Sight, Sound and Sense, Bloomington – London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare
1973Semiotics and Literary Criticism, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H.
1969 2 The Phenomenological Movement, The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Y. S.
1971Semiotika, Moscou: Nauka.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1977Etudes de logique et de linguistique (trad, par J. Milner), Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P.
1980Linguistic Considerations on Reference in J. Van Der Auwera ed. Determiners, London: Croom Helm (a paraitre).Google Scholar
Trabant, Jurgen
1976Elementeder Semiotik, Munchen: Beck.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O.
1956Philosophical Analysis. Its Development between the Two World Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1965 2).Google Scholar
Waissmann, Friedrich
1979Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, Conversations recorded by F.W., Edited by Brian Mc Guinness, Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walther, Elisabeth
1974Allgemeine Zeichenlehre. Einfuhrung in die Grund- lagen der Semiotik, Stuttgart: DVA.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Swiggers, Pierre
1986.  In The Semiotic Sphere,  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.