Article published in:
Transitivity and Valency: From theory to acquisition
Edited by Georgia Fotiadou and Hélène Vassiliadou
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 40:1] 2017
► pp. 5980


BFM (Base de français médiéval)
Banco de datos (CORDE) [en línea]. Corpus diacrónico del español. http://​www​.rae​.es (01/10/2016).


Adams, M.
(1987) From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balon, L. & Larrivée, P.
(2016) L’ancien français n’est déjà plus une langue à sujet nul – nouveau témoignage des textes légaux. Journal of French Languages Studies, 26, 221–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamba, K.
(2015) D feature and impersonal SE: A new perspective on Romance impersonal constructions. http://​cla​-acl​.ca​/wp​-content​/uploads​/Bamba​.pdf (05/01/17)
Barbosa, P.
(2011)  Pro-drop and theories of pro in the Minimalist Program. Part 1: Consistent null-subject languages and the Pronominal-Agr Hypothesis. Language and Linguistic Compass, 5(8), 551–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartra Kaufmann, A.
(2002) La passiva i les construccions que s’hi relacionen. In J. Solà et al. (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (vol. II, 2115–2179). Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Bassols de Climent, M.
s.a.). Sintaxis histórica de la lengua latina. Madrid: C.S.I.C.
Batllori, M.
(2015) Análisis comparativo de las construcciones de dislocación a la derecha y su incidencia en el orden de palabras del español, catalán y portugués medievales. In M. López Izquierda & M. Catillo Lluch (Eds.), El Orden de palabras en la historia del español y otras lenguas iberorromances (pp. 83–110). Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Brown, C. B.
(1931) The disappearance of the indefinite Hombre from Spanish. Language, 7(4), 265–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, A. & Combettes, B.
(2015) Typologie et catégorisation morphosyntaxique: Du latin au français moderne. Langue française 187(3), 15–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, M.
(1998) The loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. In M. S. Schmid/J. R. Austin & D. Stein (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 1997. Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997 (pp. 77–100). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society, 97(1), 103–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 78 ]
(2016) Voice. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance Languages (pp. 967–980). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1988) On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(4), 521–581.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, A. & Nicolae, A.
(2015) The grammaticalization of a constraint on passive reflexive constructions in Romanian. In G. Pană Dindelegan et al. (Eds.), Diachronic variation in Romanian (pp. 309–362). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C.
(1998) Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(3), 399–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gamillscheg, E.
(1957) Historische französische Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gerlach, B.
(2002) Clitics between syntax and lexicon. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. & Sansò, A.
(2007) The indefinite usage of uomo (‘man’) in early Italo-Romance. Grammaticalization and areality. https://​www​.academia​.edu​/1033376​/The​_indefinite​_usage​_of​_uomo​_man​_in​_early​_ItaloRomance​._Grammaticalization​_and​_areality (06/12/16).
(2011) From passive to impersonal: A case study from Italian and its implications. In A. Malchukov & A. Siewierka (Eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp.189–228). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2002) Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Herslund, M.
(2001) L’action fondamentale et les verbes symétriques et réfléchis. In L. Schøsler (Ed.), La valence, perspectives romanes et diachroniques (pp. 34–42). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, F.
(1990) Old French and comparative Gallo-Romance syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, G. A.
(2002) Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, S.
(1993) The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, M.
(2007) Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua, 117(1), 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C.
(2009) Word order from Latin to French. A case of grammaticalization (from pragmatics to syntactics) or of typological coherence. In C. Rossari et al. (Eds.), Grammaticalization and Pragmatics. Facts, Approaches and Theoretical Issues (pp. 1–18). Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, A. M.
(2005) Passive and impersonal se in the history of Portuguese. In C. D. Pusch, J. Kabatek & W. Raible (Eds.), Romanische Korpuslinguistik. Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft (pp.411–429). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A.
(1990) On the syntax of constructions with arb se in Spanish. Anuario del seminario de filología vasca, 24(1), 307–328.Google Scholar
Moignet, G.
(1973) Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
[ p. 79 ]
Monge, F.
(1955) Las frases pronominales con sentido impersonal en español. http://​ifc​.dpz​.es​/recursos​/publicaciones​/01​/64​/1monge​.pdf (03/10/2015).
Mutz, K.
(2012) SE-verbs, SE-forms, or SE-constructions? SE and its transitional stages between morphology and syntax. In S. Gaglia & M. -O. Hinzelin (Eds.), Inflection and word formation in Romance languages (pp. 319–346). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicolae, A.
Otero, C. P.
(1986) Arbitrary subjects in finite clauses. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras & K. Zagona (Eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax (pp. 81–110). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Poletto, C.
(2014) Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, S.
(2011) Expression et position du sujet pronominal du 12ème au 14ème siècle: une approche quantitative (recherche inédite). https://​tel​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/tel​-00667183​/document (10/05/2017).
Reichenkron, G.
(1933) Passivum, Medium und Reflexivum in den romanischen Sprachen. Jena.: Gronau.Google Scholar
Rinke, E. & Meisel, J. M.
(2009) Subject-inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. In G. A. Kaiser & E. -M. Remberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null Subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance” (pp. 93–130). Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz, Arbeitspapier 123.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. G.
(1993) Verbs and diachronic syntax. A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A.
(2003) Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2010) Agreement and head movement. Clitic, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohrbacher, B.
(1993) The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm. A theory of V to I raising. Doctoral dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sansò, A.
(2011) Grammaticalization paths and prototype effects. A history of the agentive reflexive. Folia Linguistica Historica, 32, 1–34.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, I.
(2005) A corpus-based study of null-subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. In C. D. Pusch, J. Kabatek & W. Raible (Eds.), Romanische Korpuslinguistik. Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft (pp. 359–374). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Speas, M.
(1995) Economy, agreement and the representation of null arguments. http://​people​.umass​.edu​/pspeas​/prodrop​.pdf (15/03/2016).
Stéfanini, J.
(1962) La voix pronominale en ancien et en moyen français. Aix-en-Provence: Éditions Ophrys.Google Scholar
Vance, B. S.
(1997) Syntactic change in Medieval French. Verb-second and null subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli, E.
(1986) On some properties of French clitic se . In: H. Borer (Ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics (pp. 263–283). Orlando/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 80 ]
Wolfsgruber, A. C.
(2017): Medieval Romance se. Its grammaticalization and syntactic status. New data from Medieval Spanish, French, Catalan and Occitan. Doctoral dissertation. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
Zaring, L.
(2011) On the nature of OV and VO order in Old French. Lingua, 121, 1831–1852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A.
(2008) Le médiopassif à accord riche en français: pour une approche multifactorielle. In J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (Eds.), Congrès mondial de linguistique française (pp. 2645–2662). http://​www​.linguistiquefrancaise​.org​/articles​/cmlf​/pdf​/2008​/01​/cmlf08083​.pdf (05/12/16).