Article published in:
Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 10:2 (2019) ► pp. 204228
Références

Références

Anastasio, S.
(2018) L’expression de la référence à l’espace en italien et en français L2. Une étude comparative. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université de Paris 8, Paris.Google Scholar
Bartning, I.
(1997) L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 9 , 9–50.Google Scholar
[ p. 225 ]
(2009) The advanced learner variety: 10 years later. In E. Labeau (Ed.). The advanced learner variety. The case of French (pp. 11–40). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S.
(2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Languages Studies, 14 (3), 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Wei Tham, S.
(2010) The typology of motion expressions revisited. Linguistics, 46 , 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I.
(Eds.) (1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
(2013) Disentangling manner and path. Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 55–75). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borillo, A.
(1998) L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(2004) Expressing motion events in a second language: a cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language pedagogy (pp. 13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L.
(2006) Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (1), 183–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardini, F. E.
(2008) Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19 (4), 533–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., & Stutterheim, v. C.
(1997) Relation entre grammaticalisation et conceptualisation et implications sur l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 9 , 83–115.Google Scholar
Cini, M.
(Ed.) (2008) I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demagny, A. C.
(2013) Temporalité et espace en langue seconde : contraintes typologiques dans l’acquisition du français par l’adulte anglophone. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université de Paris 8, Paris.Google Scholar
Fagard, B., Stosic, D., & Cerruti, M.
(2017) Within-type variation in Satellite-framed languages: The case of Serbian. STUF, 70 (4), 637–660.Google Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano
(2015) Motion. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 526–545). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.
(2011) Expressing voluntary motion in a second language: English learners of French. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 315–340). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A.-C.
(2008) How adult English learners of French express caused motion: a comparison with English and French natives. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27 , 15–41.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C.
(2008) Presenza e uso dei verbi sintagmatici nel parlato dell’italiano. In M. Cini (Ed.). I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (pp. 103–119). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
(2011) A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3 , 151–172.Google Scholar
[ p. 226 ]
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2004) Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual Perspectives Vol. 2 (pp. 89–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009) Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwing, S. Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Őzçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Linguistica, 49 (2), 307–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo Gascón, A.
(2012) Variation in motion events. Theory and applications. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (pp. 349–371). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Same family, different paths. In Goschler, J. & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
(Eds.) (2010) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E.
(1979) La difficulté, une notion difficile. Encrages. N° spécial de linguistique appliquée, 16–21.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., & Sharwood-Smith, M.
(Eds.) (1986) Crosslinguistic influence and second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
(1989) L’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Paris: Arman Colin.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
(2006) The semantic structure of motion events in French. In Hickmann, M. & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic system and cognitive categories Vol. 66 . (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
à paraître). From a satellite- to a verb-framed pattern: A typological shift in French. In H. Cuyckens, W. De Mulder & T. Mortelmans Eds. Variation and change in adpositions of movement Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins
Levinson, S. C.
(2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk 3rd edition. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mayer, M.
(1969) Frog, where are you. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
(2011) Thinking and speaking in two languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C.
(2002) Development of L2 functional use. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 123–144). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H., & Jarvis, S.
(2009) The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 106–118). London: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simone, R.
(1997) Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano ? In T. De Mauro & C. Lo Cascio (Eds.), Lessico e grammatica. Teorie linguistiche e applicazioni lessicografiche (pp. 155–170). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
[ p. 227 ]
(2008) Verbi sintagmatici come costruzione e come categoria. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (pp. 13–30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1987) Thinking for Speaking. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 435–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) From ‘Thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity: Vol. Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language (pp. 70–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Mind, code and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression in motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives 2 (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
(2006) What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spreafico, L.
(2008) Tipologie di lessicalizzazioni adverbiali in alcune lingue d’Europa. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca (61–81). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2009) Problemi di tipologia lessicale. I verbi di moto nello standard average european. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, v. C.
(2003) Linguistic structure and information organization. The case of very advanced learners. In S. H. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook Vol. 3 (pp. 183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1983) How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation theory research and application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT PRESS.Google Scholar
Véronique, D.
(Ed.) (2009) L’acquisition de la grammaire du français, langue étrangère. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Watorek, M.
(1996) Le traitement prototypique : définitions et implications. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 55 , 187–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 228 ]