Cover not available
Article published In:
Second Language Acquisition of Sign Languages: Acquisition d'une langue des signes comme langue seconde
Edited by Krister Schönström and Chloë Marshall
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 13:2] 2022
► pp. 199–230

Second language acquisition of depicting signs

A corpus-based account

| Stockholm University
| Stockholm University

This paper concerns the acquisition of the sign lexicon in L2 learners of Swedish Sign Language. Sampled data (conversation and narrative retelling) from a longitudinal learner corpus with 16 adult L2 signers was analyzed and compared with data from nine L1 signers. The use of three broad types of signs was analyzed: lexical signs, partly-lexical signs (i.e. depicting signs) and non-lexical signs. The results revealed some differences between L1 and L2 signers, especially with regard to depicting signs. The number of depicting signs used by L2 learners increased over time, approaching the target language use. Qualitatively, we observed differences between L1 and L2 signers in their use of depicting signs, related to handshape choice and sign constructions. We discuss these findings in light of previous research linked to L2 vocabulary as well as the role of gestural knowledge in sign L2 acquisition.

Keywords: sign language, L2M2, lexicon, sign types
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The sign language lexicon and depicting signs
    • Depicting signs with entity handshapes
    • Depicting signs with handle handshapes
    • Depicting signs with descriptor (size- and shape-specifying) handshapes
  • 3.Sign second language acquisition
  • 4.Purpose of the study
  • 5.Data and methodology
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Analysis of the sign types
    • 6.2Distribution of the subcategories of depicting signs
    • 6.3Exploring the use of depicting signs
      • 6.3.1Handle handshapes instead of entity handshapes
      • 6.3.2Choice of handshapes
      • 6.3.3Simultaneous use of two depicting signs with two hands
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.22005.sch
References
Bardel, C., Gudmundson, A., & Lindqvist, C.
(2012) Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learners’ oral production. Vocabulary acquisition and use in L2 French and Italian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 (2), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M.
(2011) When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning, 61 (4), 1302–1327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers-Visker, E.
(2020) Learning to use space: A study into the SL2 acquisition process of adult learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Doctoral thesis. Amsterdam: LOT.
Boers-Visker, E., & van den Bogaerde, B.
(2019) Learning to use space in the L2 acquisition of a signed language: Two case studies. Sign Language Studies, 19 (3), 410–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., Coppola, M., Mazzoni, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2012) When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30 1, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., & Padden, C. A.
(2001) Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation (Lawrence E, Issue May 2016, pp. 87–119). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D.
(2011) Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In G. Mathur & D. J. Napoli (Eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language (pp. 96–121). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., & Koulidobrova, E.
(2016) Acquisition of sign language as a second language. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies in language (pp. 218–230). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Sevcikova, Z., & Schembri, A.
(2012) Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language and Communication, 32 (4), 329–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELAN 6.2 [Computer software]
(2021) [URL]
Emmorey, K.
(Ed.) (2003) Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, L., & Nilsson, A.-L.
(2017) Describing spatial layouts as an L2M2 signed language learner. Sign Language & Linguistics, 20 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
(2015) Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1 (1), 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gulamani, S., Marshall, C., & Morgan, G.
(2022) The challenges of viewpoint-taking when learning a sign language: Data from the ‘frog story’ in British Sign Language. Second Language Research, 38 1, 55–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, G., & Johnston, T.
(2014) Points, depictions, gestures and enactment: partly-lexical and non-lexical sign as core elements of single clause-like units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34 (2), 262–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.-O., Tomita, N., Morgan, H., Ergin, R., Ilkbasaran, D., Seegers, S., … Padden, C.
(2017) Of the body and the hands: Patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition, 9 1, 573–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S.
(2015) The scope of transfer research. In L. Yu & T. Odlin (Eds.), New perspectives on transfer in second language learning (pp. 17–48). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. A., & Ferrara, L.
(2012) Lexicalization in signed languages: When is an idiom not an idiom? Selected Papers from the 3rd UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 1 1, 229–248.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. A., & Schembri, A.
(2010) Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et Société, 131 (1), 19–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., Gijn, I. van, & Hulst, H. van der
(2014) The non-linguistic status of the Symmetry Condition in signed languages: Evidence from a comparison of signs and speech-accompanying representational gestures. Sign Language & Linguistics, 17 (2), 215–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurz, K. B., Mullaney, K., & Occhino, C.
(2019) Constructed action in American Sign Language: A look at second language learners in a second modality. Languages, 4 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B.
(1990) Words you know: How they affect the words you learn. In Fisiak, J. (Ed.), Further insights into contrastive analysis (pp. 573–593). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
(1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeson, L., Sheridan, S., Cannon, K., Murphy, T., Newman, H., & Veldheer, H.
(2020) Hands in motion: Learning to fingerspell in Irish Sign Language. Teanga, 11, (Special Issue), 120–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepic, R.
(2019) A usage-based alternative to “lexicalization” in sign language linguistics. Glossa, 4 (1): 23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C., Bel, A., Gulamani, S., & Morgan, G.
(2021) How are signed languages learned as second languages? Language and Linguistics Compass, 15 (1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C., & Morgan, G.
(2015) From gesture to sign language: Conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (1), 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesch, J., & Schönström, K.
(2018) From design and collection to annotation of a learner corpus of sign language. In M. Bono, E. Efthimiou, S.-E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. Hochgesang, J. Kristoffersen, J. Mesch, & Y. Osugi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Involving the language community [Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)] (pp. 121–126). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
(2021) Use and acquisition of mouth actions in L2 sign language learners – A corpus-based study. Sign Language & Linguistics 24 (1), 36–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesch, J., & Wallin, L.
(2015) Gloss annotations in the Swedish Sign Language Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (1), 102–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Annoteringskonventioner för teckenspråkstexter. Version 8, maj 2021. [Annotation guidelines for sign language texts] (p. 56). Sign Language Section, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Morford, J. P., & MacFarlane, J.
(2003) Frequency characteristics of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3 (2), 213–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2013) Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In C. Müller, A. J. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1687–1701). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S.
(2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öqvist, Z., Riemer Kankkonen, N., & Mesch, J.
(2020) STS-korpus : A sign language web corpus tool for teaching and public use. In E. Efthimiou, S.-E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. A. Hochgesang, J. Kristoffersen, & J. Mesch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Sign language resources in the service of the language community, technological challenges and application perspectives [Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)] (pp. 177–180). Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Ortega, G.
(2013) Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: The role of sign structure and iconicity. Doctoral thesis, University College London.
(2017) Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., & Morgan, G.
(2015a) Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning, 65 (3), 660–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The effect of iconicity in the mental lexicon of hearing non-signers and proficient signers: Evidence of cross-modal priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30 (5), 574–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., Schiefner, A., & Özyürek, A.
(2019) Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition, 191 1, 103996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A.
(2020) Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 52 (1), 51–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riemer Kankkonen, N., Björkstrand, T., Mesch, J., & Börstell, C.
(2018) Crowdsourcing for the Swedish Sign Language Dictionary. In M. Bono, E. Efthimiou, S.-E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. Hochgesang, J. Kristoffersen, J. Mesch, & Y. Osugi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Involving the language community [Language resources and evaluation conference (LREC)] (pp. 171–174). Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Rosen, R. S.
(2004) Beginning L2 production errors in ASL lexical phonology: A cognitive phonology model. Sign Language & Linguistics, 7 (1), 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D., & Parisot, A.-M.
(2016) Constructed action in Quebec Sign Language (LSQ) amongst Deaf first language and second language users. Poster presented in the TISLR Conference , Melbourne, Australia.
Schembri, A.
(2003) Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 3–34). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D.
(2005) Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schick, B.
(1990) The effects of morphosyntactic structure on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. In C. Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp. 358–374). Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schönström, K.
(2021) Sign languages and second language acquisition research – An introduction. JESLA, The Journal of EuroSLA, 5 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönström, K., & Mesch, J.
(2017) Dataset. The project From speech to sign – Learning Swedish Sign Language as a second language. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Simper-Allen, P.
(2016) “Cut and Break”-beskrivningar i svenskt teckenspråk: Barns och vuxnas avbildande verbkonstruktioner. Doctoral thesis, Sign Language, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Sykes, E.
(Writer, Director) & Penington, J. (Producer) (1967) The Plank [Film]. Rank Film Distributors.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1975) Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 4 (pp. 181–238). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S., Galvan, D., Piñar, P., & Mather, S.
(2008) Gesture and ASL L2 acquisition. In R. M. de Quadros (Ed.) Sign languages: Spinning and unravelling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006 (pp. 639–651). Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Wallin, L.
(1996) Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language. Doctoral thesis, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.