Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.137–184

Gesture–speech unity

Phylogenesis, ontogenesis, and microgenesis

| University of Chicago

This paper outlines an argument for how development in child speech and gesture could shed light on language evolution: child acquisition can be thought of as two types of acquisition, one of which goes extinct (gesture-first, Acquisition 1) and is replaced by another (gesture–speech unity, Acquisition 2). For ontogenesis, this implies that children acquire two languages, one of which is extinct, and which again goes extinct in ontogenesis (it continues as “gestures of silence” rather than as gestures of speech). There is no way to get from Acquisition 1 to Acquisition 2. They are on different tracks. Even when they converge in the same sentence, as they sometimes do, they alternate and do not combine. I propose that the 3~4 year timing of Acquisition 2 relates to the natural selection of a kind of gestural self–response I call “Mead’s Loop”, which took place in a certain psychological milieu at the origin of language. This milieu emerges now in ontogenesis at 3~4 years and with it Mead’s Loop. It is self-aware agency, on which a self-response depends. Other developments, such as theory of mind and shared intentionality, likewise depend on it and also emerge around the same time. The prefrontal cortex, anchoring a ring of language centers in the brain, matures at that point as well, another factor influencing the late timing. On the other hand, a third acquisition, speech evoking adult attachment, begins at (or even before) birth, as shown by a number of studies, and provides continuity through the two acquisitions and extinction.

Keywords: gesture, evolution, mirror neurons, speech, development
Published online: 22 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.5.2.01mcn
References
Acredolo, L.P. & Goodwyn, S.W
(1990) Sign language in babies: The significance of symbolic gesturing for understanding language development. In R. Vasta (ed.), Annals of child development, vol. 71 (1–42). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Arbib, M
(2012) How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D.F. & Wilcox, S.E
(2007) The gestural origins of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M
(2009) Evaluating constructivist theory via Bayesian modeling of children’s early grammatical development. Abstract posted on the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference website, accessed 3/30/09. For a published version (not including the pithy quote), see Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. PNAS 106, 17284-17289.
Bertenthal, B.I., Longo, M.R. & Kosobud, A
(2006) Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 321, 210–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D
(1990) Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) On two incompatible theories of language evolution. In R.K. Larson, V. Déprez & H. Yamakido (eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives (199–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, A
. (ed. and trans.) (1970) Language and psychology: Historical aspects of psycholinguistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Braine, M.D.S
(1963) The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language 391, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M.C
(2011) The recursive mind: The origin of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) The word according to Adam: The role of gesture in language evolution. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance (177–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D.T
(1991) Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Donald, M
(1991) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, S
(2005) Gesture in signing: A case study in Taiwan Sign Language. Language and Linguistics 61, 279–318.Google Scholar
(2006) Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: Manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Gesture and Language (353–370). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H.B. & Thompson, R
(2005) Bimodal bilingualism: Code-blending between spoken English and American Sign Language. In J. Cohen, K.T. McAlister, K. Rolstad & J. MacSwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (663–673). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Firbas, J
(1971) On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Philologica Pragensia 81, 135–144.Google Scholar
Forrester, M
(2008) The emergence of self-repair: A case study of one child during the preschool years. Research on Language and Social Interaction 411, 97–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S
(2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentilucci, M. & Dalla Volta, R
(2007) The motor system and the relationship between speech and gesture. Gesture 71, 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glick, J
(1983) Piaget, Vygotsky, and Werner. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology (35–52). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., McNeill, D. & Singleton, J
(1996) Silence is liberating: Removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. The Psychological Review 1031, 34–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Butcher, C
(2003) Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendricks, H. & Hickmann, M
(2008) Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 281, 200–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W.T
(2002) The language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2981, 1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendricks, H. & Gullberg, M
(2011) Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction & Acquisition 21, 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G
(2009) Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 211, 1229–1243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S.B
(2009) Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von
(1999) On language. P. Heath (trans.), M. Losonsky (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S
(1998) Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, P.R. & Dabholkar, A.S
(1997) Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 3871, 167–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, W
(1890) Psychology (Vol. 11, Chap. IX). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A
(1979) Micro- and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science 31, 91–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A
(1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M.R. Key (ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (207–227). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1988) Sign languages of aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Signs for language origins? The Public Journal of Semiotics 21 (July), 2–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Accounting for forelimb actions as a component of utterance: An evolutionary approach. Plenary Lecture. International Society for Gesture Studies , Frankfurt/Oder, July 25, 2010.
Kita, S. & Özyürek, A
(2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 481, 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A.S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 221, 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E.T
(2008) Pre-construction of third-person elicited narratives: Relationships between short- and long-term language change. Narrative Inquiry 181, 274–298.Google Scholar
(2009-2010) The mediation of coherent discourse by kinesthetic reenactment: A case study of an autistic adolescent, Part II. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 291, 41–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E.T. & McNeill, D
in press). Narrative Development in Young Children: Gesture, imagery and Cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Lieven, E., Salomo, D. & Tomasello, M
(2009) Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 201, 461–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Ozieblo, R
(2013, unpublished ms.). Exchange on why we gesture (with responses by D. McNeill). Apply to author at Hong Kong Polytechnical University.
MacNeilage, P.F
(2008) The origin of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(1999) The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), The emergence of language (213–256). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Mampe, B., Friederici, A.D., Christophe, A. & Wermke, K
(2009) Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology 191, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D
(2003) Aspects of aspect. Gesture 31, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Imagery for speaking. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Özçaliskan (eds.). Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (517–530). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
(2012a) How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) The origin of language in gesture–speech unity. Blog in 6 parts on Linguist List/Cambridge Extras ([URL], last accessed 09.19.14).
McNeill, R.B
(2010)  Cum tacent, clamant: The pragmatics of silence in Catullus. Classical Philology 1051, 69–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, G.H
(1974) Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. W. Morris (ed.) and introduction). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M
(1962) Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, C
(2014) Gesture as ‘deliberate expressive movement’. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance (127–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F.M
(1861)  The theoretical stage, and the origin of language. Lecture 9 from lectures on the science of language . Reprinted in R. Harris (ed.) 1996 The origin of language (7–41). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K
(ed.) (1989) Narratives from the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Özçaliskan, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S
(2009) When gesture-speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes 241, 190–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peña, M., Maki, A., Kovacić, D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Koizumi, H., Bouquet, F. & Mehler, J
(2003) Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100 , 11702–11705.
Quaeghebeur, L
(2012) The ‘All-at-Onceness’ of embodied, face-to-face interaction. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 41, 167–188.Google Scholar
Quaeghebeur, L., Duncan, S., Gallagher, S., Cole, J. & McNeill, D
(2014) Aproprioception, gesture, and cognitive being. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladwig, D. McNeill & S. Tessendorf (eds.), Body language communication: An international handbook on multimodality on human interaction, vol. 21 (2026–2048). Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M
(1998) Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 211, 188–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahin, N.T., Pinker, S., Cash, S.S., Schomer, D. & Halgren, E
(2009) Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical and phonological information within Broca’s Area. Science 3261, 445–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de
(1959) Course in general linguistics. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye (eds.), W. Baskin (trans.). New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of social action 266 298 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Sekine, K
(2009a) Changes in frame of reference use across the preschool years: A longitudinal study of the gestures and speech produced during route descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes 241, 218–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Creating context: A function of gesture. Seminar at the University of Chicago, Jan. 21, 2009.
Slobin, D.I
(1987) Thinking for speaking. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (435–445). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sowell, E.R., Thompson, P.M. Holmes, C. Jernigan, T.L. & Toga, A.W
(1999)  In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturaltion in frontal and stratal regions. Nature Neuroscience 21, 859–861. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Straube, B., Meyer, L., Green, A. & Kircher, T
(2014) Sematic relation vs. surprise: The differential effects of related and unrelated co-verbal gestures on neural encoding and subsequent recognition. Brain Research 15671, 42–56.
https://doi.org/
 DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J
(2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facturing of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, H
(1971) The history of language. In E. Henderson (ed.), The indispensable foundation: A selection from the writings of Henry Sweet (1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eijck, J. & Visser, A
(2010) Dynamic semantics. In E.N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy Fall Edition, ([URL] Accessed 19/09/14).
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B
(1963) Symbol formation. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [reprinted in 1984 by Erlbaum].Google Scholar
Whorf, B.L
(1956) Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. J.B. Carroll (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 131, 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, B
(2005/2006) Do mouths sign? Do hands speak? In R. Botha & H. de Swart (eds.), Restricted linguistic systems as windows on language evolution. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics Occasional Series, Utrecht University) [URL] (accessed 05/25/14).Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
(1987) Thought and language. Edited and translated by E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar (revised and edited by A. Kozulin). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Jarbou , Samer Omar
2020. An Inherent Bond: External Visual Aid Has a Minor Effect on the Rate of Co-Speech Gestures . East European Journal of Psycholinguistics 7:2 DOI logo
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline & Camille Debras
2017. Developing communicative postures. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Blondel, Marion, Dominique Boutet, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Aliyah Morgenstern
2017. La négation chez les enfants signeurs et non signeurs. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Boutet, Dominique
2017. The dual origin of gesture. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:2 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Boutet, Dominique, Marion Blondel, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Aliyah Morgenstern
2021. A multimodal and kinesiological approach to the development of negation in signing and non-signing children. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Colletta, Jean-Marc, Ramona Kunene Nicolas & Michèle Guidetti
2018. Chapter 7. Gesture and speech in adults’ and children’s narratives. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 22], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Cooperrider, Kensy
2017. Foreground gesture, background gesture. Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Graziano, Maria, Elena Nicoladis & Paula Marentette
2020. How Referential Gestures Align With Speech: Evidence From Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers. Language Learning 70:1 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Hickmann, Maya, Edy Veneziano & Harriet Jisa
2018. Introduction. What can variation tell us about first language acquisition?. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 22], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
KUNENE NICOLAS, RAMONA, MICHÈLE GUIDETTI & JEAN-MARC COLLETTA
2017. A cross-linguistic study of the development of gesture and speech in Zulu and French oral narratives. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia & David McNeill
2017. Chapter 5 Supplement. Exchange on gesture-speech unity. In Why Gesture? [Gesture Studies, 7], ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Maragos, Petros, Vassilis Pitsikalis, Athanasios Katsamanis, George Pavlakos & Stavros Theodorakis
2016. On Shape Recognition and Language. In Perspectives in Shape Analysis [Mathematics and Visualization, ], ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Mattos, Otávio & Wolfram Hinzen
2015. The linguistic roots of natural pedagogy. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo
McNeill, David
2017. Chapter 5. Gesture-speech unity. In Why Gesture? [Gesture Studies, 7], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Savchuk, Svetlana
2021. On the diachronic aspect of gestural communication. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Sekine, Kazuki, Catharine Wood & Sotaro Kita
2018. Gestural depiction of motion events in narrative increases symbolic distance with age. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.