Cover not available
Article published In:
Converging paradigms in contrastive and translation studies: Crosslinguistic corpus perspectives
Edited by Silvia Bernardini and Adriano Ferraresi
[Languages in Contrast 23:2] 2023
► pp. 133–160

On similative demonstratives in Czech and English

Evidence from corpora

ORCID logo | Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic
ORCID logo | Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic

This paper is a contrastive corpus-based study of similative demonstratives, a major means of expressing similarity and ad-hoc categorization. It explores the divergence between the Czech demonstrative takový and its English dictionary equivalent such in their “atypical” – extended, or non-phoric – uses. Through the triangulation of comparable fiction texts, their translation (from a bidirectional translation corpus) and spoken language data (from comparable monolingual corpora of spoken English and Czech), converging evidence is found of the development of discourse functions of the Czech takový which shows an increase in its intersubjectivity, not attested with such, but common with the English type nouns sort, kind, and type. These cross-linguistic parallels are not only relevant for current discussions on intersubjectivity and intersubjectification, but they also call for further research on general patterns of ad-hoc categorization.

Keywords: similative demonstratives, similarity, ad-hoc categorization, (inter)subjectivity, Czech/English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Demonstratives, similarity, and ad-hoc categorization
    • 1.2Grammaticalization of similative demonstratives
    • 1.3(Inter)Subjectivity of similative demonstratives
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3. Such and takový in fiction
    • 3.1Syntax and discourse functions of such and takový in fiction
    • 3.2Translation correspondences of such and takový
      • 3.2.1Such and its Czech translations
      • 3.2.2Takový and its English translations
    • 3.3Summary: Such and takový in fiction
  • 4. Such and takový in spoken corpora
    • 4.1Discourse functions of such in spoken English (BNC2014)
    • 4.2Discourse functions of takový in spoken Czech (ORAL2013)
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00026.jan
References (33)
Altenberg, B.
2007 The Correspondence of Resultive Connectors in English and Swedish. Nordic Journal of English Studies 6(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benešová, L., Křen, M. and Waclawičová, M.
2013 ORAL2013: reprezentativní korpus neformální mluvené češtiny. ÚČNK FF UK, Praha. Available at [URL]
Čermák, F. and Rosen, A.
2012 The Case of InterCorp, a Multilingual Parallel Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3): 411–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Consten, M. and Averintseva-Klisch, M.
2012 Tentative Reference Acts? “Recognitional Demonstratives” as Means of Suggesting Mutual Knowledge – or Overriding a Lack of it. Research in Language (10)31: 257–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
1999 Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 171: 463–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friendly, M.
1994 Mosaic Displays for Multi-Way Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 891: 190–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, L. and Van de Velde, F.
2011 A Corpus-Based Account of the Development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, Intensification and (Inter)Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 221: 765–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, L., Brems, L. and Van de Velde, F.
2014 Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification. Typology and Operationalization. In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification, L. Brems, L. Ghesquière and F. Van de Velde (eds), 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hardie, A.
2012 CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3): 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.
1996 Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A Taxonomy of Universal Uses. In Studies in Anaphora, B. Fox (ed.), 205–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, W. Bisang, N. Himmelmann and B. Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschová, M.
1988 Netypické případy užití ukazovacích výrazů takový, tak . Naše řeč 71(2): 57–61.Google Scholar
Janebová, M., Martinková, M. and Gast, V.
2023 Czech Type Nouns: Evidence from Corpora. In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages: Semantics and Pragmatics on the Move, W. Mihatsch, I. Hennecke, A. Kisiel, A. Kolyaseva, K. Davidse and L. Brems (eds), 571–617. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On, R. Facchinetti (ed.), 51–72. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P. and Tugwell, D.
2004 The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress. Lorient, France, 6–10 July 2004. 105–116.Google Scholar
Komárek, M., Kořenský, J., Petr, J. and Veselková, J.
1986  Mluvnice češtiny 2. Tvarosloví. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
König, E.
2017 The Deictic Identification of Similarity. In Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Y. Treis and M. Vanhove (eds), 143–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Beyond Exophoric and Endophoric Uses: Additional Discourse Functions of Demonstratives. In Demonstratives in discourse, Å. Næss, A. Margetts and Y. Treis (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
König, E. and Umbach, C.
2018 Demonstratives of Manner, of Quality and of Degree: A Neglected Subclass. In Atypical Demonstratives: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, M. Coniglio, A. Murphy, E. Schlachter and T. Veenstra (eds), 285–327. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Křížková, H.
1971 Zájmena typu ten a takový v současných slovanských jazycích. Slavica slovaca 6(1): 15–30.Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T.
2017 The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and Building a Spoken Corpus of Everyday Conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344.Google Scholar
Mauri, C. and Sansò, A.
2020 Ad hoc Categorization and Languaging: The Online Construction of Categories in Discourse. Language Sciences 811: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Šimík, R.
2016 On Pragmatic Demonstratives: The Case of Pragmatic Discourse Anaphora in Czech. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 201, N. Bade, P. Berezovskaya, and A. Schöller (eds), 640–657. Available at [URL]
Traugott, E. C.
2003 From Subjectification to Intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English. In Language Evolution: Cognitive and Cultural Factors, R. Eckardt, G. Jaeger and T. Veenstra (eds), 219–40. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 (Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, and H. Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhlířová, L.
1992  Ten nějaký//nějaký ten a případy podobné. Naše řeč 75(5): 247–254.Google Scholar
Umbach, C. and Ebert, C.
2009 German Demonstrative so – Intensifying and Hedging Effects. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 33(1–2): 153–168.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. and Coussé, E.
2016  Such and Sådan – The Same but Different. Nordic Journal of English Studies 15(3): 15–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J. and Sahoo, K.
2020  Such Similatives: A Cross-Linguistic Reconnaissance. Language Sciences 811:1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar