Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 14:2 (2014) ► pp. 251–277

How nouns turn into adjectives

The emergence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding processes

| F.R.S.-FNRS and Université catholique de Louvain (Belgium), F.W.O.-Vlaanderen and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)
This study focuses on French, English and Dutch adjectives that arise through debonding from N+N (and N+A) compounds or compound-like sequences (e.g. the adjectival uses of English ‘key’ and French clé “key”). Debonding is a type of degrammaticalization defined by Norde as “a composite change whereby a bound morpheme in a specific linguistic context becomes a free morpheme” (Norde, 2009: 186). We investigate for each of the three languages how the debonding process is impacted by three different factors: (1) the semantics of the noun subject to debonding, (2) the degree of prosodic and morphological cohesion of the sequence, (3) the presence of adjective inflection in the language. It is furthermore argued that in the case of Dutch, an additional process should be taken into account, that is the possibility of clipping of N+A compounds (e.g. stapel “lit. pile; madly in love” < stapelverliefd “lit. pile-in love; madly in love”).
Keywords: adjective, compound, Dutch/English/French, debonding
Published online: 30 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.2.04goe
References

References

Amiot, D. and Van Goethem, K.
2012 “A constructional account of French -clé ‘key’ and Dutch sleutel- ‘key’ as in mot-clé/ sleutelwoord ‘key word’”. Morphology 22:347–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bache, C.
2000 Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlage, E.
2012 “Syntactic change in light verb constructions of the types take advantage of and make use of”. Paper presented at the Late Modern English Syntax workshop, Zürich, 19 August 2012.
Booij, G.
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Construction Morphology: a brief introduction”. Morphology 22:343–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L.J. and Traugott, E.C.
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D.
2001 “Gradience and linguistic change”. In Historical linguistics 1999, L.J. Brinton (ed), 110–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. English word classes: Categories and their limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, H.
2010 “Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and phrasal verb particle out”. In Gradualness, gradience and grammaticalization, E.C. Traugott and G. Trousdale (eds), 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The course of actualization”. Language 88:601–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Change through recombination: Blending and analogy”. Language Sciences 40: 80-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H., Ghesquière, L. and Van de Velde, F.
2013 “Multiple source constructions in language change”. Special issue of Studies in Language 37(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farnetani, E., Taylor Torsello, C. and Cosi, P.
1988 “English compound versus non-compound noun phrases in discourse: An acoustic and perceptual study”. Language and Speech 31:157–180.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W.H.
1980 “‘Blood-hot’, ‘stone-good’: a preliminary report on adjective-specific intensifiers in Dutch”. Leuvense Bijdragen 69: 445–472.Google Scholar
Fradin B.
2009 “IE, Romance: French”. In Oxford Handbook on Compounding, R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fudge, E.
1984 English Word-stress. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H.J.
2009 “The English compound stress myth”. Word Structure 2(2):1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goes, J.
1999 L’adjectif. Entre nom et verbe. Paris/Bruxelles: De Boeck/Larcier.Google Scholar
Gross, G.
1988 “Degré de figement des noms composés”. Langages 90:57–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Les expressions figées en français: noms composés et autres locutions. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J. and van den Toorn, M.
1997 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1999 “Why is grammaticalization irreversible?”. Linguistics 37: 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiligsmann, Ph. and Meurs, Chr
2007 “Het gebruik van samengestelde adjectieven met een versterkend betekenisaspect in het Nederlands”. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 3: 301–316.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. and Thompson, S.A.
1984 “The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar”. Language 60(4):703–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lauwers, Peter
Forthcoming. “Copular constructions and adjectival uses of bare nouns in French: a case of syntactic recategorization?”. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association 58(2).
Lehmann, A. and Martin-Berthet, Fr
2008 (Third edition). Introduction à la lexicologie: Sémantique et morphologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
L’heureux, V.
2008 “The Adjectival Status of ‘Fun’ and ‘Key’ in Present-Day English investigated”. Ms. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.
1969 The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Colas, M.
1994 Les mots à trait d’union. Paris: Didier Erudition.Google Scholar
Mollin, S.
2012 “Tracking changes in binomial reversibility in Late Modern English”. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Zurich, 20-25 August 2012.
Noailly, M.
1990 Le substantif épithète. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Norde, M.
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I.
2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I., Kunter, G., Lappe, S. and Braun, M.
2008 “The role of semantics, argument structure, and lexicalization in compound stress assignment in English”. Language 84:760–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-Chr. and Rioul, R.
1999 Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, L.
2002 “Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering”. Folia Linguistica 36(3-4):219–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, K.
2008 “Oud-leerling versus ancien élève: A Comparative Study of Adjectives Grammaticalizing into Prefixes in Dutch and French”. Morphology 18:27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Choosing between A+N Compounds and Lexicalized A+N Phrases: The Position of French in Comparison to Germanic Languages”. Word Structure 2(2):241–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “The French construction ‘nouveau + past participle’ revisited. Arguments in favour of a prefixoid analysis of nouveau”. Folia Linguistica 44(1): 163–178.Google Scholar
2011 “From adjective to affix in Dutch and French. The influence of word order patterns on grammaticalization”. Studies in Language 35(1):194–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Le statut des séquences ‘N+N à N2 productif’: le cas de N-clé”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 35(1):76–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, K. and Amiot, D.
2011 “Un problème vraiment clé? Degrammaticalization of French [N+N]-compounds”. Poster presented at The eighth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting. University of Cagliari, Sardinia, 14-16 September 2011.
2012 “Debonding of French [N+ limite] compounds: a diachronic-constructional account”. Paper presented at the Morphology Day, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, 8 September 2012.
Van Goethem, K. and Hiligsmann, Ph
2012 “Een vergelijkende analyse van reuze en géant: grammaticalisatie, degrammaticalisatie en lexicalisatie”. n/f: Tijdschrift van de Association des néerlandistes de Belgique francophone et de France 11(1):135–156.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K. and Hüning, M.
2013 “Debonding of Dutch and German compounds”. Paper presented at the Germanic Sandwich conference, Leuven, 11-12 January 2013.
Vartiainen, T.
2013 “Subjectivity, indefiniteness and semantic change”. English Language and Linguistics 17(1): 157–179 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwanenburg, W.
1992 “Compounding in French”. Rivista di linguistica 4(1):221–240.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Battefeld, Malte, Torsten Leuschner & Gudrun Rawoens
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Booij, Geert & Jenny Audring
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
De Smet, Hendrik
2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28:1 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal
2017.  In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nagano, Akiko
2018. A conversion analysis of so-called coercion from relational to qualitative adjectives in English. Word Structure 11:2 ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Norde, Muriel & Caroline Morris
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2014. Bleaching, productivity and debonding of prefixoids. Lingvisticae Investigationes 37:2 ► pp. 256 ff. Crossref logo
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 475 ff. Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Matthias Hüning
2015. From Noun to Evaluative Adjective: Conversion or Debonding? DutchTopand Its Equivalents in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 366 ff. Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Nikos Koutsoukos
2018. “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch. Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1369 ff. Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Muriel Norde
2020. Extravagant “fake” morphemes in Dutch. Morphological productivity, semantic profiles and categorical flexibility. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.