Article published in:
Contrasting contrastive approaches
Guest-edited by Bart Defrancq
[Languages in Contrast 15:1] 2015
► pp. 3464
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Breitbarth, Anne, Sara Delva & Torsten Leuschner
2016. A (Very) Imperfect Sandwich: English Should, German Sollte, Dutch Mocht/Moest as Grammaticalizing Markers of Conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28:4  pp. 282 ff. Crossref logo
Leuschner, Torsten
2016.  In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Van de Velde, Freek & Muriel Norde
2016.  In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Van Olmen, Daniël
2018. Reproachatives and imperatives . Linguistics 56:1  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Auer, P. and Lindström, J.
2012Verb-first Conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speaking. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, P. Auer and S. Pfänder (eds), 218–262. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baird, W.D. and Goble, D.
1994The Story of Oklahoma. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. and Pancheva, R.
2006Conditionals. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 4, M. Everaert and H. van Riensdijk (eds), 638–687. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S. and Leech, G.
2000Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B.
1998Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Declerck, R. and Reed, S.
2001Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engel, U.
2004Deutsche Grammatik. Neubearbeitung. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
Fleischer, J. and Simon, H.J.
(eds) 2013Sprachwandelvergleich — Comparing Diachronies. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, K.
1973Verbstellung und Relieftheorie. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte des deutschen Nebensatzes. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
2010The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 595–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haumann, D.
1995Sentential Adjuncts. EESE 6/1995: 101–146. Available at http://​webdoc​.sub​.gwdg​.de​/edoc​/ia​/eese​/articles​/haumann​/6​_95​.html#2​.1, [last accessed 14 August 2014]Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A.
1986A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2010What can Synchronic Gradience Tell us about Reanalysis?. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalisation, E.C. Traugott and G. Trousdale (eds), 181–201. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
1975The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
1991On some Principles of Grammaticisation. In Approaches to Grammaticalisation. Volume 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R.D. and Pullum, G.K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. and Embick, D.
1994Conditional inversion. Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 24: 133–147.Google Scholar
Imo, W.
2012Online Changes in Syntactic Gestalts in Spoken German. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, P. Auer and S. Pfänder (eds), 127–155. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V. Syntax. Fourth Volume. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B.
2011Conditional Inversion: A Construction-based Approach. Language and Information 15: 13–29.Google Scholar
König, E.
2012Comparative Linguistics and Language Comparison. Languages in Contrast 12: 3–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V.
2012Understanding English-German Contrasts. Third edition. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
König, E. and van der Auwera, J.
1988Clause Integration in German and Dutch Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals, and Concessives. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, J. Haiman and S.A. Thompson (eds), 101–133. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
2004Meaning and the English Verb. Third edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Leirbukt, O.
1997Über Wahrscheinlichkeitsgradierung und Illokutionen bei Konditional-gefügen. In Aspekte der Modalität im Deutschen — auch in kontrastiver Sicht, F. Debus and O. Leirbukt (eds), 77–101. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin
2011Anmerkungen zur (Un-)Integriertheit von Konditionalsätzen mit Verberststellung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30: 75–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1929A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part I: The Sentence. Second Half: The Composite Sentence. Second edition. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reis, M. and Wöllstein, A.
2010Zur Grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler V1-Gefüge im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 111–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S.A.
1999The Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(ed.) 1996Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: C.U.P. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, R.
2013Satztyp und Sprachwandel. In: Satzypen des Deutschen, J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach and H. Altmann (eds), 738–763. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
1985Conditional Markers. In Iconicity in Syntax, J. Haiman (ed.), 289–307. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Nest, D.
2010aEmergenz und Grammatikalisierung von V1-Konditionalen. Ein Rekonstruktionsversuch am Beispiel des Deutschen und Englischen. Ph.D. Diss. Ghent University.
2010b Should Conditionals be Emergent…: Asyndetic Subordination in English and German as a Challenge to Grammaticalisation Research. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalisation Research, An Van linden, J.-C. Verstraete and K. Davidse (eds), 93–136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J.
1997Pragmatics in the Last Quarter Century: The Case of Conditional Perfection. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 261–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar