Cover not available
Article published In:
Contrasting contrastive approaches
Guest-edited by Bart Defrancq
[Languages in Contrast 15:1] 2015
► pp. 34–64

Asynchronous grammaticalization

V1-conditionals in present-day English and German

| Ghent University

The present paper contrasts verb-first (V1-) conditionals in written usage in present-day English and German. Based on the hypothesis that V1-protases originated in independent interrogatives and then grammaticalized as conditional subordinate clauses in an asynchronous fashion in both languages, we use data from the British National Corpus (BNC) and the Deutsches Referenzkorpus (DeReKo) to investigate the lexical overlap of V1-protases with interrogatives and their functional overlap with ‘if-/wenn’-conditionals. The results show, inter alia, that English V1-conditionals are highly divergent from polar interrogatives and occupy a functional niche with respect to ‘if-’conditionals, with their German counterparts showing more transitional characteristics in both respects; they also suggest a special role for V1-protases with ‘should/sollte’ in expressing a subtype of neutral, rather than tentative, conditionality. Finally, prospects are discussed for future research regarding possible synchronic (i.e. discourse-functional) and diachronic (i.e. systemic) motivations for the differences and similarities observed between V1-conditionals in the two present-day languages.

Keywords: conditionals, grammaticalization, English/German, verb-first, interrogatives
Published online: 3 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.15.1.03leu
References
Auer, P. and Lindström, J
2012 Verb-first Conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speaking. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, P. Auer and S. Pfänder (eds), 218–262. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baird, W.D. and Goble, D
1994 The Story of Oklahoma. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. and Pancheva, R
2006 Conditionals. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 41, M. Everaert and H. van Riensdijk (eds), 638–687. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S. and Leech, G
2000 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B
1998 Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Declerck, R. and Reed, S
2001 Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel, U
2004 Deutsche Grammatik. Neubearbeitung. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
Fleischer, J. and Simon, H.J
(eds) 2013 Sprachwandelvergleich — Comparing Diachronies. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, K
1973 Verbstellung und Relieftheorie. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte des deutschen Nebensatzes. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L
2010 The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 411: 595–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haumann, D
1995 Sentential Adjuncts. EESE 6/1995: 1101–146. Available at [URL], [last accessed 14 August 2014]Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A
1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M
2010 What can Synchronic Gradience Tell us about Reanalysis?. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalisation, E.C. Traugott and G. Trousdale (eds), 181–201. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J
1975 The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 On some Principles of Grammaticisation. In Approaches to Grammaticalisation. Volume 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R.D. and Pullum, G.K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. and Embick, D
1994 Conditional inversion. Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 241: 133–147.Google Scholar
Imo, W
2012 Online Changes in Syntactic Gestalts in Spoken German. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, P. Auer and S. Pfänder (eds), 127–155. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1940 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V. Syntax. Fourth Volume. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B
2011 Conditional Inversion: A Construction-based Approach. Language and Information 151: 13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, E
2012 Comparative Linguistics and Language Comparison. Languages in Contrast 121: 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V
2012 Understanding English-German Contrasts. Third edition. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
König, E. and van der Auwera, J
1988 Clause Integration in German and Dutch Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals, and Concessives. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, J. Haiman and S.A. Thompson (eds), 101–133. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G
2004 Meaning and the English Verb. Third edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Leirbukt, O
1997 Über Wahrscheinlichkeitsgradierung und Illokutionen bei Konditional-gefügen. In Aspekte der Modalität im Deutschen — auch in kontrastiver Sicht, F. Debus and O. Leirbukt (eds), 77–101. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin
2011 Anmerkungen zur (Un-)Integriertheit von Konditionalsätzen mit Verberststellung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 301: 75–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1929 A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part I: The Sentence. Second Half: The Composite Sentence. Second edition. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reis, M. and Wöllstein, A
2010 Zur Grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler V1-Gefüge im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 291: 111–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S.A
1999 The Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J
(ed.) 1996 Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: C.U.P. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, R
2013 Satztyp und Sprachwandel. In: Satzypen des Deutschen, J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach and H. Altmann (eds), 738–763. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C
1985 Conditional Markers. In Iconicity in Syntax, J. Haiman (ed.), 289–307. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Nest, D
2010a Emergenz und Grammatikalisierung von V1-Konditionalen. Ein Rekonstruktionsversuch am Beispiel des Deutschen und Englischen. Ph.D. Diss. Ghent University.
2010b  Should Conditionals be Emergent…: Asyndetic Subordination in English and German as a Challenge to Grammaticalisation Research. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalisation Research, An Van linden, J.-C. Verstraete and K. Davidse (eds), 93–136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J
1997 Pragmatics in the Last Quarter Century: The Case of Conditional Perfection. Journal of Pragmatics 271: 261–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Breitbarth, Anne, Sara Delva & Torsten Leuschner
2016. A (Very) Imperfect Sandwich: EnglishShould, GermanSollte, DutchMocht/Moestas Grammaticalizing Markers of Conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28:4 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Leuschner, Torsten
2016. Fictive questions in conditionals?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek & Muriel Norde
2016. Exaptation. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël
2018. Reproachatives and imperatives. Linguistics 56:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.