Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 18:2 (2018) ► pp. 283–306

A comparison of diminutive expressions in English and Slovene as exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda

| University of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
The article presents and compares ways of expressing diminution in English and Slovene nouns, verbs and adjectives with the aim of testing a hypothesis suggesting that Slovene uses diminutive forms more frequently than English. Depending on language typology, diminutiveness can be realized predominantly word-formationally or predominantly analytically. The hypothesis is tested against an analysis of diminutive forms used in Dahl’s Matilda and its Slovene translation, showing that Slovene indeed prefers to use diminutives more frequently than English. A tendency can be established for Slovene to form diminutives by word-formational means in the categories of noun and verb. In verbs, English tends towards neutrality of expression. Frequent use of multiple diminutiveness and the ability of analytic and synthetic diminutive forms to be freely interchangeable in Slovene testify to the strong presence of diminutive forms in the language system.
Keywords: evaluative morphology, diminutive, contrastive analysis, English / Slovene
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Patterns of expressing diminutiveness in Slovene and English compared
    • 2.1Diminutiveness in Slovene nouns
    • 2.2Diminutiveness in English nouns
    • 2.3Diminutiveness in Slovene verbs
    • 2.4Diminutiveness in English verbs
    • 2.5Diminutiveness in Slovene adjectives
    • 2.6Diminutiveness in English adjectives
  • 3.The corpus of Matilda – a quantitative analysis of English and Slovene diminutive expressions
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Diminutive nouns and their translation patterns
    • 3.3Diminutive verbs and their translation patterns
    • 3.4Diminutive adjectives and their translation patterns
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.15016.sic
References
Adams, V.
2001 Complex Words in English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
Bagasheva, A.
2015 Features of evaluative morphology in Bulgarian. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics [online] 12(1). 22–38. http://​www​.skase​.sk​/Volumes​/JTL27​/pdf​_doc​/02​.pdf [last accessed March 9 2015].
Bajec, A.
1950 Besedotvorje slovenskega jezika I: Izpeljava samostalnikov [Word-formation of the Slovene language I: Suffixation of nouns]. Ljubljana: SAZU.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
1983 English Word-formation (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21(3), 533–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., and Huddleston, R.
2002 Lexical word-formation. In R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum (eds), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 1621–1721. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
2009 Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber, and P. Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bulloch, J. M.
1924 The delight of the Doric in the diminutive. In W. Craigie, J. Buchan, P. Giles, and J. M. Bulloch, The Scottish Tongue, London.Google Scholar
Chamonikolasová, J., and Rambousek, J.
2007 Diminutive expressions in translation: A comparative study of English and Czech. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 21.1, 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R.
1988 Matilda. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
1993 Matilda. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga. (transl. Bogdan Gradišnik)Google Scholar
Dressler, W., and Merlini Barbaresi, L.
1994 Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Đurić, R.
2004 Deminutivni sufiksi u srpskom i njihovi prevodni ekvivalenti u engleskom jeziku [Diminutive suffixes in Serbian and their translation equivalents in English]. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 47(1–2), 147–164.Google Scholar
Gregová, R.
2015 Slovak. In N. Grandi, and L. Kortvélyessy (eds), Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, 296–305. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jovanović, V. Ž.
2014 Morphological means оf expressing value judgment in English and Serbian. In V. Lopičić, and B. Mišić Ilić (eds), Values across Cultures and Times, 213–231. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
1996 Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3), 533–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klinar, S.
1996 Prevajanje slovenskih manjšalnic [Translation of Slovene diminutives]. In Klinar, Stanko (ed), Prispevki k tehniki prevajanja iz slovenščine v angleščino [Contributions to Slovene-English translation techniques], 194–212. Radovljica: Didakta.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, P.
1985 Diminutives. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Norde, M., and Van Goethem, K.
2014 Bleaching, productivity and debonding of prefixoids: A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37.2, 256–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panocová, R.
2011 Evaluative suffixes in Slavic. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov (Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies), 53(4). 175–182.Google Scholar
Plag, I.
2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K. P.
2003 Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, SSKJ [Standard Slovene dictionary]
1970–1991 Ljubljana: Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša ZRC SAZU. http://​bos​.zrc​-sazu​.si​/sskj​.html [last accessed March 15, 2016].
Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, SSKJ 2
[Standard Slovene dictionary] 2014 2nd edition. Ljubljana: Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša ZRC SAZU. http://​www​.sskj2​.si/ [last accessed March 15 2016].
Spasovski, L.
2012 Morphology and pragmatics of the diminutive: Evidence from Macedonian. Unpubl. PhD thesis, Arizona State University. https://​repository​.asu​.edu​/attachments​/93782​/content​/tmp​/package​-JuLbYS​/Spasovski​_asu​_0010E​_11685​.pdf [last accessed May 15, 2016].
Stramljič Breznik, I.
2009 Besedotvorna kategorija manjšalnic v slovenščini in makedonščini [Word-formational category of diminutives in Slovene and Macedonian]. In Radeva, V., C. Avramova, and J. Baltova (eds), Slovoobrazuvane i leksikologija [Word-formation and lexicology], 199–210. Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo Sv. Kliment Ohridski.Google Scholar
2010 Tvorjenke slovenskega jezika med slovarjem in besedilom [Complex words in Slovene between lexicon and text] (Zora 71). Maribor: Filozofska fakulteta UM.Google Scholar
Toporišič, J.
1991 Slovenska slovnica [Slovene grammar]. 4th edn. Maribor: Založba Obzorja.Google Scholar
Vidovič Muha, A.
1988 Slovensko skladenjsko besedotvorje ob primerih zloženk [Slovene syntactic word-formation in the case of compounds]. Ljubljana: ZIFF, Partizanska knjiga.Google Scholar
1995 Dva tipološka zgleda normativne vrednosti slovenske besedotvorne morfematike [Two typological examples of normative value of Slovene word-formational morphematics]. In S. Gajda (ed) Języki słowiańskie 1945–1995; Gramatyka – leksyka – odmiany [Slavic languages 1945–1995: Grammar – lexis – varieties], 153–164. Opole: Uniwersytet opolski, Instytut filologii polskiej.Google Scholar
2011 Slovensko skladenjsko besedotvorje [Slovene syntactic word-formation]. 2nd edn. Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba FF.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1984 Diminutives and depreciatives: Semantic representation for derivational categories. Quaderni di semantica 5(1), 123–130.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1991 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Colston, Herbert L.
2019.  In How Language Makes Meaning, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.