Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 16:1 (2016) ► pp. 130
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given
2018.  In Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 286], Crossref logo
Crible, Ludivine & Sílvia Gabarró-López
2021. Coherence relations across speech and sign language. Languages in Contrast 21:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Murillo, Silvia
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Aijmer, K. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M.
2006Introduction. In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, K. Aijmer and A.M. Simon-Vandenbergen (eds), 1–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. and Granger, S.
2002Recent Trends in Cross-linguistic Lexical Studies. In Lexis in Contrast. Corpus-based Approaches, B. Altenberg and S. Granger (eds), 3–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anscombre, J.-C.
1990Thème, espaces discursifs et représentation événementielle. In Fonctionnalisme et pragmatique. À propos de la notion de thème, J.-C. Anscombre and G. Zaccaria (eds), 43–150. Milan: Unicopli.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J.-C. and Ducrot, O.
1983L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bach Martorell, C.
1996Reformular: ¿una operación argumentativa aséptica? Estudio del conector de reformulación parafrástica és a dir. Sendebar 7:255–271.Google Scholar
2004Els connectors reformulatius catalans: anàlisi i proposta d’aplicació lexicogràfica. PhD Thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Blakemore, D.
1992Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bosque, I.
(ed) 2004Redes. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
2004Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, L.R. Horn and G. Ward (eds), 633–656. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chalker, S.
1996Linking Words. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Charolles, M. and Coltier, D.
1986Le contrôle de la compréhension dans une activité rédactionnelle: éléments pour l’analyse des reformulations paraphrastiques. Pratiques 49:51–66.Google Scholar
Clift, R.
2006Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5):569–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, M.J.
2003Two Ways to Reformulate: a Contrastive Analysis of Reformulation Markers. Journal of Pragmatics 35(7):1069–1093. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, M.J. and Bach, C.
2007Contrasting the Form and Use of Reformulation Markers. Discourse Studies 9(2):149–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, P.
2006Three Linguistic Theories of Polyphony/Dialogism: an External Point of View and Comparison. Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer 5:3–32.Google Scholar
Downing, A. and Locke, P.
2006English Grammar. A University Course. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O.
1980Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation. In Les mots du discours, D. Bourcier and O. Ducrot (eds), 7–56. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
1982La notion de sujet parlant. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage 2:65–93.Google Scholar
1984Esquisse d’une théorie polyphonique de l’énonciation. In Le dire et le dit, O. Ducrot (ed.), 171–233. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
2001Quelques raisons de distinguer locuteurs et énonciateurs . Polyphonie 3. Available at http://​ojs​.ruc​.dk​/index​.php​/poly​/article​/view​/2410​/726 [last accessed 26 July 2013].Google Scholar
Fernández Polo, F.J.
1999Traducción y retórica contrastiva. A propósito de la traducción de textos de divulgación científica del inglés al español. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Figueras Solanilla, C.
2001Pragmática de la puntuación. Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar
Fløttum, K.
1994À propos de c’est-à-dire et ses correspondants norvégiens. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 15:109–130.Google Scholar
2002Fragments guillemetés dans une perspective polyphonique. Tribune 13. Available at http://​www​.hum​.au​.dk​/romansk​/polyfoni​/Diverse%20artikler​/Fløttum​_guillemets​.htm [last accessed 23 July 2013].Google Scholar
2010EU Discourse: Polyphony and Unclearness. Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 990–999. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. and Kinn, T.
2006Academic Voices – across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcés Gómez, M.P.
2008La organización del discurso: marcadores de ordenación y de reformulación. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Gülich, E. and Kotschi, T.
1983Les marqueurs de la reformulation paraphrastique. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 5:305–351.Google Scholar
1987Les actes de reformulations dans la consultation. La dame de Caluire . In L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation, P. Bange (ed.), 15–81. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, E.
2005The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37(9):1325–1353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.M.
2006Contrastive Analysis of Adversative Relational Markers, Using Comparable Corpora. In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, K. Aijmer and A.M. Simon-Vandenbergen (eds), 139–153. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Li, C.N.
1986Direct and Indirect Speech: a Functional Study. In Direct and Indirect SpeechDirect and Indirect Speech, F. Coulmas (ed.), 29–45. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lorés Sanz, R.
2003The Translation of Tourist Literature: the Case of Connectors. Multilingua 22(3):291–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado González, C.
1999Discurso directo y discurso indirecto. In Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española I, Vol. 3, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 3549–3595. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M.A. and Portolés Lázaro, J.
1999Los marcadores del discurso. In Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española I, Vol. 3, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Meyer, C.F.
1992Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murat, M. and Cartier-Bresson, B.
1987C’est-à-dire ou la reprise interprétative. Langue Française 73:5–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, S.
2004A Relevance Reassessment of Reformulation Markers. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11):2059–2068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Los marcadores de reformulación explicativa en español y en inglés: estudio contrastivo de ‘o sea’ y sus traducciones ‘that is (to say)’ e ‘in other words’. In La reformulación del discurso en español en comparación con otras lenguas, M.P. Garcés Gómez (ed.), 137–161. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III/B.O.E.Google Scholar
2012The Use of Reformulation Markers in Business Management Research Articles: an Intercultural Analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(1):62–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nølke, H.
2006Pour une théorie de la polyphonie: problèmes, avantages, perspectives. In Le sens et ses voix. Dialogisme et polyphonie en langue et en discours, L. Perrin (ed.), 243–269. Metz: Université Paul Verlaine.Google Scholar
Nølke, H., Fløttum, K. and Norén, C.
2004ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Pennec, B.
2007 In other words: un connecteur de reformulation. In Les connecteurs, jalons du discours, A. Celle, S. Gresset and R. Huart (eds), 139–156. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, S.
1998Reformulación y reformuladores. A propósito de Les opérations de reformulation. Oralia 1:183–198.Google Scholar
2013Un solo tipo de reformulación. Cuadernos AISPI 2:151–170.Google Scholar
Portolés, J.
2001¿Qué nos dicen del discurso los marcadores del español? In Meaning and the Component of Grammar/ El significado y los componentes de la gramática, J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), 263–278. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2004Consideraciones metodológicas para el estudio del significado de los marcadores del discurso. In Homenaje a Oswald Ducrot, E. Narvaja de Arnoux and M.M. García Negroni (eds), 315–336. Buenos Aires: Endeba.Google Scholar
2011Las partículas focales desde una perspectiva polifónica. In Marcadores del discurso: de la descripción a la definición, H. Aschenberg and Ó. Loureda (eds), 51–76. Madrid-Frankfurt Iberoamericana Vervuert.Google Scholar
Preacher, K.J.
2001Calculation for the Chi-square Test: an Interactive Calculation Tool for Chi-square Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence [Computer software]. Available at http://​www​.quantpsy​.org​/chisq​/chisq​.htm [last accessed 14 July 2014].
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reyes, G.
2002Metapragmática: lenguaje sobre lenguaje, ficciones y figuras. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Rossari, C.
[1994] 1997Les opérations de reformulation. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Santos Río, L.
2003Diccionario de partículas. Salamanca: Luso-Española de Ediciones.Google Scholar
Saz Rubio, M.M. del
2003An Analysis of English Discourse Markers of Reformulation. PhD Thesis, Universitat Universitat de València.
2007English Discourse Markers of Reformulation. A Classification and Description. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sheen, R.
2002 Focus on Form and Focus on Forms . English Language Teaching Journal 56(3):303–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.M. and Aijmer, K.
2007The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: a Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
[1986] 1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willet, T.L.
1988A Cross-linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1):51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D.
2004Relevance Theory. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, L.R. Horn and G. Ward (eds), 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar