Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 16:1 (2016) ► pp.133–158

When the local becomes international

The lexicogrammar of rhetorical moves in English and Spanish Sociology abstracts

| University of Zaragoza (Spain)

Abstracts play a major role as time-saving and information-managing devices in our globalized world of scientific communication. In many non-Anglophone academic journals the pressure to disseminate results internationally is manifested in the requirement to write an English version of the abstract, usually a requisite for the journal to be included in international databases and citation indexes. In this paper it is my aim to investigate the main lexicogrammatical choices which contribute to the identification of rhetorical moves in research article (RA) abstracts translated into English by Spanish academics, and which are published in prestigious national journals as a requisite for those journals to be included in international databases. To carry out this analysis, three sets of texts have been compiled: (i) Spanish abstracts published in prestigious Spanish journals, (ii) their corresponding English translations published in the same journals; (iii) RA abstracts written in English by Anglophone academics (affiliated to Anglophone institutions) and published in leading international journals whose language of publication is English. I will focus on the discipline of Sociology, an emergent field for Spanish academics in terms of their contribution to the international arena. My ultimate aim is to explore how English translations compare with English L1 abstracts in terms of lexicogrammatical choices.

Keywords: research article abstracts, international databases, lexicogrammatical choices, translation, English/Spanish
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.06lor
References
Alharbi, L
1997 Rhetorical Transfer across Cultures: English into Arabic and Arabic into English. Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(2):69–94.Google Scholar
Alharbi, L. and Swales, J.M
2011 Arabic and English Abstracts in Bilingual Language Science Journals: Same or Different? Languages in Contrast 11(1):69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, F
2014 Evidential and Epistemic devices in English and Spanish Medical, Computing and Legal Scientific Abstracts: A Contrastive Study. In Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, M. Bondi and R. Lorés-Sanz (eds), 21–42. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bellés-Fortuño, B. and Querol-Julián, M
2010 Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts: A Cross-cultural Study between Spanish and English Medical Discourse. In Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Duenas and E. Lafuente-Millan (eds), 83–98. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V
2004 If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, M
2010 Abstract Writing: The Phraseology of Self-representation. In Linguistic Interactions in/and Specific Discourses, M. Conejero López, M. Muñoz Calvo and B. Penas Ibáñez (eds), 31–48. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Burgess, S
2002 Packed Houses and Intimate Gatherings: Audience and Rhetorical Structure. In Academic Discourse, Flowerdew, J. (ed.), 196–215. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. and Martín-Martín, P
2010 Interpersonal Features of Spanish Social Sciences Journal Abstracts. In Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Duenas and E. Lafuente-Millan (eds), 99–115. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Busch-Lauer, I.A
1995 Textual Organization in English and German Medical Abstract. In Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference, B. Warvik, S. Tanskanen and R. Hiltunen (eds), 175–186. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.Google Scholar
2014 Abstracts: Cross-linguistic, disciplinary and intercultural perspectives. In Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, M. Bondi and R. Lorés-Sanz (eds), 43–63. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cortes, V
2013 The purpose of this study is to: Connecting Lexical Bundles and Moves in Research Article Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121:33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diani, G
2014 On English and Italian Research Article Abstracts. In Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, M. Bondi and R. Lorés-Sanz (eds), 65–83. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Divasson, L. and León Pérez, I.K
2006 Textual and Language Flaws: Problems for Spanish Doctors in Producing Abstracts in English. Ibérica 111:61–79.Google Scholar
Fernández Antolín, M.J., López Arroyo, B. and de Felipe Boto, R
2006 Contrasting the Rhetoric of Abstracts. Hermēneus. Revista de Traduccion e Interpretación 81:85–110.Google Scholar
Frawley, W
1984 Translation. Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives. London and Toronto: Associated U.P.Google Scholar
Granger, S
2003 The Corpus Approach: A Common Way forward for Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies. In Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies, S. Granger, J. Lerot and S. Petch-Tyson (eds), 17–29. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2010 Comparable and translation corpora in cross-linguistic research. Design, analysis and applications. Journal of Shanghai Jiastong University 21:14–21.Google Scholar
Johansson, S
2007 Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewin, B.A
2010 Writing Readable Research. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
López Arroyo, B, Fernández Antolín, M.J. and de Felipe Boto, R
2007 Contrasting the Rhetoric of Abstracts in Medical Discourse: Implications and Applications for English Spanish Translation. Languages in Contrast 7(1):1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R
2006 ‘I Will Argue that’: First Person Pronouns and Metadiscoursal Devices in RA Abstracts in English and Spanish. ESP across Cultures 31:23–40.Google Scholar
2009a Different Worlds, Different Audiences: A Contrastive Analysis of Research Article Abstracts. In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, E. Suomela-Salmi and F. Dervin (eds), 187–198. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b (Non-) Critical Voices in the Reviewing of History Discourse: A Cross-cultural Study of Evaluation. Hyland and Diani 20091. 143–160.Google Scholar
2011 The Construction of the Author’s Voice in Academic Writing: The Interplay of Cultural and Disciplinary Factors. Text & Talk 31(2):173–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Local Disciplines, Local Cultures: Praise and Criticism in British and Spanish History Book Reviews. Brno Studies in English 38(2):97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Lost (and Gained) in Translation: A Contrastive (English/Spanish) Analysis of Rhetorical and Lexicogrammatical Patterns in Sociology RA Abstracts. In Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, M. Bondi and R. Lorés-Sanz (eds), 85–109. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín-Martín, P
2003 A Genre Analysis of English and Spanish Research Paper Abstracts in Experimental Social Sciences. English for Specific Purposes 22(1):25–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse. A Cross-Cultural Genre-Analytic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martínez, I
2005 Native and Non-native Writers’ Use of First Person Pronouns in the Different Sections of Biology Research Articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3):174–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A.I. and Suárez, L
2008 A Study of Critical Attitude across English and Spanish Academic Book Reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71:15–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure. In Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings, K. Hyland and G. Diani (eds), 161–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mur Dueñas, P
2007 ‘I/We Focus on. . . ’: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Self-mentions in Business Management Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(2):143–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Attitude Markers in Business Management Research Articles: A Cross-Cultural Corpus-Driven Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20(1):50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perales-Escudero, M. and Swales, J.M
2011 Tracing Convergence and Divergence in Pairs of Spanish and English Research Article Abstracts: The case of Ibérica . Ibérica 211:49–70.Google Scholar
Pho, P.D
2008 Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance. Discourse Studies 101: 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.M
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2005 Attended and Unattended “this” in Academic Writing: A Long and Unfinished Story. ESP Malaysia 111:1–15.Google Scholar
Teich, E
2003 Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bonn, S. and Swales, J.M
2007 English and French Journal Abstracts in the Language Sciences: Three Exploratory Studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(2): 93–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
2019. La escritura del resumen en biología: Una revisión bibliográfica. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Lobos, Ignacio & René Venegas
2021. El género tesis de licenciatura en lingüística. Spanish in Context 18:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.