Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 17:2 (2017) ► pp. 183204
References

References

Bauer, L.
1983English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Compounds and minor word-formation types. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds), 483–506. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berg, T.
1998The incompatibility of morpheme orders and lexical categories and its historical implications. English Language and Linguistics 2: 245–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, T., Helmer, S., Neubauer, M., and Lohmann, A.
2012Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics 50: 269–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Botha, R.
1981A Base Rule Theory of Afrikaans Synthetic Compounding. In The Scope of Lexical Rules, M. Moortgat, H. v.d. Hulst and T. Hoekstra (eds), 1–77. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A.
2002An Introduction to English Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Donalies, E.
2011Basiswissen deutsche Wortbildung. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Dudenredaktion
2000Duden: Die deutsche Rechtschreibung, 22nd ed. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
2005Duden: Die Grammatik, 5th ed. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, P.
2004Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erben, J.
2006Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre, 6th ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
[ p. 203 ]
Eschenlohr, S.
1999Vom Nomen zum Verb: Konversion, Präfigierung und Rückbildung im Deutschen. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Fischer, O.
2007Morphosyntactic Change: Formal and Functional Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, W. and Barz, I.
2012Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 4th ed. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, V.
2008V-N compounds in English and German. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 56: 269–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, V. and Haas, F.
2008On reflexive and reciprocal readings of anaphors in German and other European languages. In Reciprocity and Reflexivity Theoretical and Typological Explorations, E. König and V. Gast (eds), 307–346.Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grimm, J. and Grimm, W.
1854–1961Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Haas, F.
2010Reciprocity in English: Historical Development and Synchronic Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haselow, A.
2011Typological Changes in the Lexicon: Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R.
1983The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginning of the English Phrasal Verb: The Evidence from some Old and early Middle English Texts. Turku/Helsinki: Turun Yliopiso.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E.
2005Analogy as Structure and Process. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D.
2006Vocabulary. In A History of the English Language, R. Hogg and D. Denison (eds), 199–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, S.
1993The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, P.
2005Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. MT Summit 5: 79–86.Google Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V.
2012Understanding English-German Contrasts, 3rd ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
2008Roots, stems and word classes. Studies in Language 32: 546–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R.
2009IE, Germanic: English. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber and P. Stekauer (eds), 357–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lohde, M.
2006Wortbildung des modernen Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.
1969The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
Available online at www​.oed​.com [last accessed 2 June 2016]
Plank, F.
2008Thoughts on the origin, progress, and pro status of reciprocal forms in Germanic, occasioned by those of Bavarian. In Reciprocity and Reflexivity Theoretical and Typological Explorations, E. König and V. Gast (eds), 347–373.Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Raffelsiefen, R.
1998Semantic stability in derivationally related words. In Historical linguistics 1995, volume 2, R. M. Hogg and L. van Bergen (eds), 247–267. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
2011English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
2015The scope of word-formation research. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Vol. I. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 40/1), P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen and F. Rainer (eds), 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
[ p. 204 ]
Schröder, A.
2011On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Vogel, P.M.
1996Wortarten und Wortartenwechsel: Zu Konversion und verwandten Erscheinungen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B. and Nedjalkov, V. P.
2007Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in German. In Reciprocal Constructions, V. P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 455–512. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Koutsoukos, Nikos
2021. Denominal verb formationin English and Modern Greek. Languages in Contrast 21:1  pp. 138 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.