Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 19:1 (2019) ► pp. 106132
References

References

Benedict, R.
1947The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. Patterns of Japanese Culture. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Dsess, L.
1962On the Structure of Associative Meaning. Psychological Review, 69: 161–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubov, I. G.
(ed) 1997Mentalnost Rossiyan (Spetsifika Soznaniya Bolshikh Grupp Naseleniya Rossii). Moscow: Imidzh-contact. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dzhambaeva, Zh. A.
2014Linvokulturnaya Kontseptologiya: Sovremennoye Sostoyaniye i Puti Razvitiya. In Voprosy Russkoy Filologii i Metodiki Prepodavaniya Russkogo Yazyka i Literatury, K. R. Nurgali & V. P. Sinyachkin (eds). Moscow: ALMAVEST. 37–48.
(In Russian.)Google Scholar
Glaveva, D. G.
2003Traditsionnaya Yaponskaya Kultura: Spetsifika Mirovospriyatiya. Мoscow: Vostochnaya Literatura. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
2008Natural Semantic Metalanguage: the State of the Art. In Cross-Linguistic Semantics, C. Goddard (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grigoriev, A. A. and Klenskaya, M. S.
2000Problemy Kolichestvennogo Analiza v Sopostavitelnykh Issledovaniyakh Assotsiativnykh Poley. In Yazykovoye Soznaniye i Obraz Mira, N. V. Ufimtseva (ed). Moscow: Institut Yazykoznaniya RAN. 313–318.
(In Russian.)Google Scholar
Haga, Ya
2004Nihonjinrashisa no Koozoo – Gengobunkaron Koogi. Tokyo: Taishuukan Shoten. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
Korinfsky, A. A.
1994Narodnaya Rus: Krugliy God Skazaniy, Poveriy, Obychayev i Poslovits Russkogo Naroda. Moscow: Moskovskiy Rabochiy. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kubryakova, Ye. S. and Alexandrova, O. V.
1999O Konturakh Novoy Paradigmy Znaniya v Lingvistike. In Struktura i Semantika Khudozhestvennogo Teksta, Ye. I. Dibrova (ed.). Moscow: SportAkadem Press. 186–197. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lapin, N. I. and Belyaeva, L. A.
(eds) 1996Dinamika Tsennostey Naseleniya Reformiruyemoy Rossii. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Mayevsky, Ye. V.
2000Graficheskaya Stilistika Yaponskogo Yazyka. Moscow: Muravey-Gayd. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Meshcheryakov, A. N.
2007Kniga Yaponskikh Simvolov. Kniga Yaponskikh Obyknoveniy. Moscow: Natalis; RIPOL Classic. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Palkin, A. D.
2008Assotsiativniy Eksperiment kak Sposob Krosskulturnogo Issledovaniya Obrazov Soznaniya, Voprosy Psikhologii, 4: 81–89. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Russkiy Assotsistivniy Slovar
2002V 2 t. T. 1. Ot Stimula k Reaktsii / Ed. by Yu. N. Karaulov, G. A. Cherkasova, N. V. Ufimtseva, Yu. A. Sorokin, Ye. F. Tarasov. Мoscow: AST – Astrel. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ovchinnikov, V. V.
1971Vetka Sakury. Rasskaz o Tom, chto za Lyudi Yapontsy. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Sapir, E.
1921Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Shakhovsky, V. I.
2009Konnotatsiya i Assotsiatsii: Aspekt Ikh Vzaimosvyazi i Otnosheniya k Leksicheskomu Znacheniyu Slova (Psikholingvisticheskiy Podkhod). In Yazyk i Soznaniye: Psikholingvisticheskiye Aspekty, N. V. Ufimtseva and T. N. Ushakova (eds). Moscow / Kaluga: Eydos. 306–316. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1971Psycholinguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shmelyov, A. D.
2005V Poiskakh Mira i Lada. In Zaliznyak, Anna A., Levontina, I. B. and Shmelyov, A. D. Klyucheviye Idei Russkoy Yazykovoy Kartiny Mira. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury. 110–129. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ufimtseva, N. V.
2011Yazykovoye Soznaniye: Dinamika i Variativnost. Moscow – Kaluga: IYa RAN (IP Shilin I. V.). (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Vladimirov, V. V.
2006Smysl Russkoy Zhizni. Moscow: Algoritm. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
1987Thinking and Speech. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (eds). Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology. New York: Plenum Press. 39–285.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1992Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar