Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 20:1 (2020) ► pp.107–140

Who stole what from whom?

A corpus-based, cross-linguistic study of English and Spanish verbs of stealing

ORCID logo | University of Granada (Spain)
 | University of Granada (Spain)
Drawing on the Lexical Grammar Model, Frame Semantics and Corpus Pattern Analysis, we analyze and contrast verbs of stealing in English and Spanish from a lexico-semantic perspective. This involves looking at the lexical collocates and their corresponding semantic categories that fill the argument slots of verbs of stealing. Our corpus search is performed with the Word Sketch tool on Sketch Engine. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet taken advantage of the Word Sketch tool in the study of the selection preferences of verbs of stealing, let alone a semantic, cross-linguistic study of those verbs. Our findings reveal that English and Spanish verbs of stealing map out the same underlying semantic space. This shared conceptual layer can thus be incorporated into an ontology based on deep semantics, which could in turn enhance NLP tasks such as word sense disambiguation, machine translation, semantic tagging, and semantic parsing.
Keywords: verbs of stealing, cross-linguistic study, Lexical Grammar Model, semantic space, English/Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The lexico-semantic dimensions of verbs of stealing
    • 2.1Lexical grammar model
    • 2.2Frame semantics
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Corpora
    • 3.2Procedure for the extraction of lexical collocates and grouping into semantic categories
    • 3.3Cross-linguistic equivalence
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Semantic categories in verbs of stealing
    • 4.2Cross-linguistic correspondence
    • 4.3Word sketches: Issues and limitations
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.19002.fer
References (57)
References
Asher, N. 2011. Lexical Meaning in Context: a Web of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baisa, V., Moze, S. and Renau, I. 2016. Linking Verb Patterns Dictionaries of English and Spanish. Proceedings of the Seventeenth European Association for Lexicography International Congress EURALEX ʼ16. Tbilisi, Georgia, 6–10 September 2016. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. 410–417.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. 1992. Frames, Concepts and Conceptual Fields. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, E. Kittay and A. Lehrer (eds), 21–74. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berman, R. 1982. On the Nature of ‘Oblique’ Objects in Bitransitive Constructions. Lingua 56(2): 101–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. 2005. Semantic Frames as Interlingual Representations for Multilingual Lexical Databases. International Journal of Lexicography 18(4): 445–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Towards a Frame-Constructional Approach to Verb Classification. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 571: 17–48.Google Scholar
2013. Frame Semantics and Translation. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation, A. Rojo and I. Ibarretxte-Antunano (eds), 125–158. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Butler, C. 2003. Structure and Function: a Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Part I: Approaches to the Clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cambridge Learner’s Dictionary. 2018. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Collins Free Online Dictionary. 2018. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Diccionario de la Real Academia Española (DRAE). 2018. Madrid: Real Academia Española. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Diccionario Salamanca de la Lengua Española. 2018. Madrid: Santillana Educación. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Dik, S. 1978. Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Dux, R. 2011. A Frame-Semantic Analysis of Five English Verbs evoking the Theft Frame. Master’s Dissertation, University of Texas. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
2018. Frames, Verbs, and Constructions: German Constructions with Verbs of Stealing. In Approaching German Syntax from a Constructionist Perspective, A. Ziem and H. Boas (eds), 367–405. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enghels, R. and Wylin, K. 2015. Expressing the Source of Dispossession Acts in French and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 15(1): 102–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinoza, M., Montiel-Posoda, E. and Gómez-Peréz, A. 2009. Ontology Localization. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture K-CAP ʼ09. Redondo Beach, California, USA, 1–4 September 2009. ACM. 33–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, P. and Mairal, R. 1998a. Prototipos semánticos en el lexicón Lexemático Funcional. In Estudios de tipología lingüística, J. D. D. Luque-Durán and A. Pamies-Bertrán (eds), 15–36. Granada: Método.Google Scholar
1998b. Towards a Typology of Predicate Schemata in a Functional-Lexematic Model. In Towards a Functional Lexicology, G. Wotjak (ed), 11–37. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1998c. Towards a Semantic Syntax. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 361: 37–64.Google Scholar
1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. A Conceptually-Oriented Approach to Semantic Composition in RRG. In The Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar, R. D. Van Valin (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
1985. Frames and the Semantics of Understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 61: 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Baker, C. and Lowe, J. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING ʼ98. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 10–14 August 1998. Université de Montréal. 86–90. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Fillmore, C. and Baker, C. 2010. A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds), 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, L. and Baker, C. 2018. Learning to Align across Languages: Toward Multilingual FrameNet. Proceedings of the International FrameNet Workshop 2018: Multilingual Framenets and Constructicons. Miyazaki, Japan, 12 May 2018. 13–22.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2010. Verbs, Constructions and Semantic Frames. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, M. Rappaport-Hovav, E. Doron and I. Sichel (eds), 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruzitis, N. and Dannéls, D. 2017. A Multilingual FrameNet-based Grammar and Lexicon for Controlled Natural Language. Languages Resources and Evaluation 51(1): 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P. 2004. Corpus Pattern Analysis. Proceedings of the Eleventh European Association for Lexicography International Conference EURALEX ʼ04. Lorient, France, 6–10 July 2004. Université de Bretagne-Sud. 87–97.Google Scholar
2012. How People Use Words to Make Meanings: Semantic Types Meet Valencies. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Boulton and J. Thomas (eds), 52–67. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
2013. Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P. and Jezek, E. 2010. What Lexical Sets Tell Us about Conceptual Categories. Lexis 4: Corpus Linguistics and the Lexicon 7–22.Google Scholar
Harley, H. 2003. Possession and the Double Object Construction. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2, P. Pika and J. Rooryck (eds), 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, B. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. 2013. The TenTen Corpus Family. In Corpus Linguistics 2013: Abstract Book, A. Hardie and R. Love (eds), 125–127. Lancaster: UCREL.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on. Lexicography 11: 7–36. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Kilgarriff, A. and Renau, I. 2013. esTenTen, a Vast Web Corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 951: 12–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Vojtěch, K., Krek, S., Srdanovič, I. and Tiberius, C. 2010. A Quantitative Evaluation of Word Sketches. Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Association for Lexicography International Congress EURALEX ʼ10. Leeuwarden, Netherlands, 6–10 July 2010. Fryske Akademy. 372–379.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 2007. Cognitive Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds), 421–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 2018. London: Pearson Longman. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Marsh, I., Melville, G., Morgan, K., Norris, G. and Walkington, Z. 2006. Theories of Crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D., Kilgarrif, A., Jakubíček, M. and Reddy, S. 2015. Semantic Word Sketches. In Corpus Linguistics 2015: Abstract Book, F. Formato and A. Hardie (eds), 231–233. Lancaster: UCREL.Google Scholar
Miller, G. and Fellbaum, C. 2007. WordNet Then and Now. Language Resources and Evaluation 41(2): 209–214. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Oxford English Dictionary. 2018. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Periñán, C. and Arcas, F. 2007. Deep Semantics in an NLP Knowledge Base. Paper presented at the Twelfth Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence CAEPIA ʼ07, Spain, 12–16 November.
Ruppenhofer, J., Boas, H. and Baker, C. 2017. FrameNet. In The Routledge Handbook of Lexicography, P. Fuertes-Olivera (ed), 383–398. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M., Johnson, C. and Scheffczyk, J. 2010. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute.Google Scholar
Rychlý, P. 2008. A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing RASLAN ʼ08. Karlova Studánka, Czech Republic, 5–7 December 2008. Masaryk University. 6–9.Google Scholar
Subirats, C. 2009. Spanish FrameNet: A Frame Semantics Analysis of the Spanish Lexicon. In Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography. Methods and Applications, H. Boas (ed), 135–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Thorgren, S. 2005. Transaction Verbs: A Lexical and Semantic Analysis of Rob and Steal . Reports from the Department of Language and Culture 31, 1–44.Google Scholar
Trampus, M. and Novak, B. 2012. The Internals of an Aggregated Web News Feed. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Multiconference on Information Society, Slovenia, October 2012.
Velardi, P., Pazienza, M. and Fasolo, M. 1991. How to Encode Semantic Knowledge: a Method for Meaning Representation and Computer-aided Acquisition. Computational Linguistics 17(2): 153–170.Google Scholar
WordReference Dictionary. 2018. Available at [URL] [last accessed 28 December 2018].
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cacioli, Caterina & Paola Vernillo
2023. How did you break that?. Languages in Contrast 23:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Chambó, Santiago & Pilar León Araúz
2023. Corpus-driven conceptual analysis of epidemic and coronavirus for the Humanitarian Encyclopedia. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Martínez, Nicolás José & Ángel Miguel Felices-Lago
2021. Automatic lexical collocate extraction for corpus-based ontology building and refinement. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.