Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 23:1 (2023) ► pp.133
Bazzanella, C.
2014Linguistica cognitiva. Un’introduzione. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Benigni, V., Ramusino Cotta, P., Mollica, F. and Schafroth, E.
2015How to Apply CxG to Phraseology: A Multilingual Research Project. Journal of Social Sciences 11(3): 275–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I.
2004REDES. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
2006Práctico. Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casadei, F.
1995Per una definizione di «espressione idiomatica» e una tipologia dell’idiomatico in italiano. Lingua e stile XXX(2): 335–358.Google Scholar
2003Lessico e semantica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
1995The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Knop, S.
2021The integration of frequency dimensions and lexicalization preferences in contrastive analysis. Paper presented at the International Contrastive Linguistics Conference (ICLC9) , Italy, 13–15 May 2021.
Detges, U. and Waltereit, R.
2002Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 211: 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovol’skij, D. O. and Piirainen, E.
2005Figurative Language: Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Evans, N.
2010Semantic Typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Typology, J. J. Sung (ed.), 504–533. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldweg, H. and Breidt, E.
1996COMPASS. An Intelligent Dictionary System for Reading Text in a Foreign Language. In Papers in Computational Lexicography: COMPLEX ’96, F. Kiefer, G. Kiss and J. Pajzs (eds). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ganfi, V. and Piunno, V.
2017Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano CII (2): 184–204.Google Scholar
2019Costruzioni a verbo supporto con nomi di parti del corpo in italiano antico e contemporaneo. In Verbi supporto, fenomeni e teorie, A. Pompei and L. Mereu (eds), 187–222. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Gargett, A. and Barnden, J.
2015Gen-Meta: Generating Metaphors by Combining AI and Corpus-Based Modeling. Web Intelligence 13(2): 103–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. and Fischer, K.
(eds) 2010Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C.
2002Whorf meets Wierzbicka: Variation and Universals in Language and Thinking. Language Sciences 25(4): 393–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grezka, A.
2021Variabilité et traitement automatique des langues. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43(2): 280–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2001The European Linguistic Area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals, M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.
2002Word Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C.
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. and Zé Amvela, E.
2007Words, Meaning and Vocabulary. An Introduction to Modern English Lexicology. London: Continuum International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V.
2013The TenTen Corpus Family. Proceedings of the Seventh International Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL 2013). Lancaster, United Kingdom, 23–26 July 2013. 125–127.Google Scholar
Kay, P.
1992At least. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, A. Lehrer, E. Feder Kittay and R. Lehrer (eds), 309–331. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V.
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on. Lexicography 11: 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konecny, C.
2018Valenza e coesione collocazionale: osservazioni su alcuni punti di intersezione tra due fenomeni interrelati. In La grammatica delle valenze, S. Dallabrida and P. Cordin (eds), 143–161. Firenze: Franco Casati Editore.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Vanhove, M. and Koch, P.
2007Typological Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Linguistic Typology 111: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovecses, Z.
2000Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, T. P.
1981Quantitative Contrastive Equivalence. Studia Linguistica 351: 102–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind & its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Le Fur, D.
2008Dictionnaire des combinaisons de mots: les synonymes en contexte. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
[1982]1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lindquist, H. and Levin, M.
2008Foot and Mouth. The Phrasal Patterns of two Frequent Nouns. In Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger and F. Meunier (eds), 143–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, V.
2013Dizionario Combinatorio Italiano. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C.
1999La metáfora en la formación de fraseologismos alemanes y españoles: las metáforas locales. Paremia 81: 333–338.Google Scholar
2004Fraseologismos somáticos del alemán. Un estudio léxico-semántico. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2020Esquemas fraseológicos y construcciones fraseológicas en el contínuum léxico-gramática. In Clases y categorías en la fraseología española, C. Sinner, E. Tabares Plasencia and E. T. Montoro del Arco (eds), 13–36. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2020Nuevas aportaciones de la Gramática de Construcciones a los estudios de fraseología en las lenguas románicas. Romanica Olomucensia 32(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. A.
2019Constructions are Patterns and so are Fixed Expressions. In Patterns in Language and Linguistics, B. Busse and R. Möhlig-Falke (eds), 193–220. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mogorrón Huerta, P., Grezka, A. and Navarro-Brotons, L.
2021Les variations diatopiques dans les expressions figées. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43(2): 169–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mol, S.
2004Head and Heart: Metaphors and Metonymies in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Translation and Corpora, K. Aijmer and H. Hasselgård (eds), 87–112. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Panther, K. U. and Thornburg, L. L.
2007Metonymy. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds), 236–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y. and Geeraerts, D.
2006Metonymy as a Prototypical Category. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3): 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piirainen, E.
2008Figurative Phraseology and Culture. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger and F. Meunier (eds), 207–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Widespread Idioms in Europe and Beyond: Toward a Lexicon of Common Figurative Units. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piunno, V.
2018Sintagmi preposizionali con funzione aggettivale e avverbiale. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Piunno, V. and Ganfi, V.
Ruthrof, H.
2000The Body in Language. London: The Cassell Press.Google Scholar
Savary, A., Sailer, M., Parmentier, Y., Rosner, M., Rosén, V., Przepiórkowski, V., Krstev, C., Vincze, V., Wójtowicz, B., Losnegaard, G., Parra Escartín, C., Waszczuk, J., Constant, M., Osenova, P., Sangati, F.
2015PARSEME–PARSing and Multiword Expressions within a European Multilingual Network. Proceeding of the Seventh Language & Technology Conference (LTC ’15). Poznań, Poland, 27–29 November 2015. 27–29.Google Scholar
Schafroth, E.
2020Fraseologismi a schema fisso – basi teoriche e confronto linguistico. Romanica Olomucensia 32(1): 173–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simone, R.
2007Constructions and Categories in Verbal and Signed Languages. In Verbal and Signed Languages. Comparing Structures, Constructs, and Methodologies, E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea and R. Simone (eds), 198–252. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simone, R. and Masini, M.
2007Support Nouns and Verbal Features: A Case Study from Italian. Verbum 29(1): 143–172.Google Scholar
Simone, R. and Piunno, V.
2017Combinazioni che costituiscono entrata. Rappresentazione lessicografica e aspetti lessicologici. Studi e saggi linguistici 55(2): 13–44.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1999A Way with Common Words. In Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, H. Hasselgård and S. Oksefjell (eds), 157–179. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
2007Quantitative Data on Multi-Word Sequences in English: The Case of the Word World. In Text, Discourse and Corpora, M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs and W. Teubert (eds), 163–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Steyer, K.
(ed.) 2018PREPCON. Präposition-Nomen-Verbindungen im Kontext. Ein Blick in die Projektwerkstatt. Teil II. SDS-Bd. Sprachliche Verfestigung. Wortverbindungen, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. and Trousdale, G.
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
2007Bodies and their Parts: An NSM Approach to Semantic Typology. Language Sciences 291: 14–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
1965[1949]Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar