Article published In:
Languages in Contrast: Online-First Articles

The intricate construction of projection in news reports

A contrastive English/Spanish account

ORCID logo | Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
This paper looks at projection in the discourse of news reports in English and Spanish. The analysis reveals the extent to which projection pervades these texts, not only at clause complex level – the traditional object of study of projection – but also below the clause complex, at clause simple and at group level. The discussion of a number of examples from English and Spanish news reports serves to answer the three research questions guiding this research, which concern (a) the preferred types of projection in news reports, (b) the preferred realizations of the different types of projection in news reports, and (c) the main cross-linguistic similarities and contrasts of projection in news reports. The answers to these issues ultimately contribute to a broader understanding of the concept of projection.
Keywords: hypotaxis, news reports, parataxis, projection, English/Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.Logical projection in news reports
  • 4.Projection within the clause simplex in news reports
    • 4.1Experiential projection
    • 4.2Interpersonal projection
    • 4.3A particularity of Spanish: Projection signaled by the verbal group
  • 5.The intricacy of projection in news reports
  • 6.Conclusions and pointers to the future
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.22002.ars
References (41)
References
Akerejola, E. 2005. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Òkó. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.
Alonso Belmonte, I. (ed.). 2007. Different Approaches to Newspaper Opinion Discourse. Special Issue of Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada. Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada (AESLA).Google Scholar
Arús-Hita, J. 2018. A Contrastive Description of Projection in English and Spanish across Ranks: From the Clause Nexus to the Group. In Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, A. Sellami-Baklouti and L. Fontaine (eds), 163–181. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arús-Hita, J., Teruya, K., Bardi, M. A., Kashyap, A. K. and Mwinlaaru, I. 2018. Quoting and Reporting across Languages. A Systemic Functional Approach. Word 64(2): 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardi, M. A. 2008. A Systemic Functional Description of the Grammar of Arabic. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.
Bell, A. 1991. The Language of News Media. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, F. 2016. Rumores y otros malos hábitos. El condicional evidencial en español. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 3(2): 35–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boehm, V. and Hennemann, A. 2014. The Evidential Use of the Spanish Imperfect and the Conditional in Journalistic Contexts. Studia Neophilologica 861: 183–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffarel, A. 2006. A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2004. Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E. 2008. The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. 2004. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available at [URL] [last accessed 22 July 2023].
Dendale, P. 2014. Le conditionnel de reprise : Son apparition en français et son traitement dans les grammaires du XVIe au XXe siècle. In Médiativité, Polyphonie et Modalité en Français : Études Synchroniques et Diachroniques, E. Oppermann-Marsaux, A. Rodriguez and J. C. Anscombre (eds), 243–260. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrell, M. 2011. Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage (5th ed). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. 2000. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. 2005. Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. and Feng, J. 2016. Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication 33(3): 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. and Sancho Guinda, C. 2012. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. 2012. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. and Schneide, S. 2010. New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavid, J., Arús-Hita, J. and Zamorano, J. R. 2010. Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish. A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lavid, J., Arús-Hita, J. and Moratón, L. 2009. Comparison and Translation: Towards a Combined Methodology for Contrastive Corpus Studies. International Journal of English Studies. Special issue on Recent and Applied Corpus Studies, P. Cantos and A. Sánchez (eds): 159–173.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1996. Tense in English seen through Systemic Functional Theory. In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Meaning and Choice in Language. Studies for Michael Halliday, M. Berry, C. Butler, R. Fawcett and G. Huang (eds), 431–498. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Teruya, K. 2014. Projection as a Fractal Motif: Semantic and Lexicogrammatical Manifestations. Draft.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. 2001. Corpus Linguistics (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Venerós, M. and Elorza, I. 2014. Constructing Stance by Means of Attribution. How is the ‘Evaluative Space’ Filled in Science Popularizations in English? In Subjectivity and Epistemicity. Corpus, Discourse, and Literary Approaches to Stance, D. Glynn and M. Sjölin (eds), 281–301. Lund: Lund Studies in English.Google Scholar
Ras, I. A. 2015. ‘The Alleged Fraud’: Modality in a Corpus of Corporate Fraud News. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA), Kent, 11 March 2015. Available at [URL] [last accessed 13 April 2023].
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [online]. Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. Available at [URL] [last accessed 22 January 2023].
Scollon, R. 1998. Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Shu-Kun, C. 2016. Circumstantiation of Projection: Functional Syntax of Angle in English and Chinese. Ampersand 31: 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teruya, K. 2007. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wang, W. 2008. Newspaper Commentaries on Terrorism in China and Australia: A Contrastive Genre Study. In Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, U. Connor, E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds), 169–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, P. R. R. 1998. Telling Media-Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
Xuan, W. and Chen, S. 2020. Taking Stock of Accumulated Knowledge in Projection Studies from Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Research Synthesis. Functional Linguistics 7(1):1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, G. 2017. Hypotactic and Embedded Projections of Sentence Segments in Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics 19(2): 207–221.Google Scholar