Review published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 8:1 (2008) ► pp.125129
References (8)
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hagège, C. 1997. “Language as a Faculty, Languages as ‘Contingent’ Manifestations and Humans as Function Builders”. In Reconnecting Language. Morphology and Syntax in Functional Perspectives, A. -M. Simon-Vandenbergen, K. Davidse and D. Noël (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29–47. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 1541] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J. -O. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A. -M. 1995. “Firthian Linguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics. Manual, J. Verschueren, J. -O. Östman and J. Blommaert (eds), 278–282. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rastier, F. 1991. “La croisée des chemins: Situation de la linguistique”. Bulletin de la Section de Linguistique de la faculté des lettres de Lausanne 111:33–46.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. Forthcoming. “Ways of Impersonalising: Pronominal vs. Verbal Strategies”. In Current Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and cognitive perspectives, M. de los Ángeles Gómez-González, J. L. Mackenzie and E. M. González-Alvarez (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar