Cover not available
Part of
The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s L'Étranger and Its Translations / L'Étranger de Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME): An empirical study / Etude empirique
Edited by Eric Corre, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 35] 2020
► pp. 143–160

Chapter 8
The PC and Imparfait in German and Swedish (re)‍translations of L’Étranger

| Stockholm University
| Lund University
This comparative study investigates the strategies used for translating the French past tenses (passé composé and imparfait) in two Swedish and two German translations of Camus’ L’Étranger. Due to grammatical restrictions of the target languages, it is difficult for a translator to render both the semantics and the stylistic effects connected to these French past tenses. The first translation into Swedish and the first translation into German both conform to target culture norms as they use präterium (German) and preteritum and aspectual verbal markers (Swedish). The retranslations into both languages reproduce, to a much higher degree, the restrained style of the original, either through the alternation between präteritum and perfekt (German) or a less frequent use of verbal markers (Swedish).
Keywords: passé compose , imparfait , retranslation, Swedish, German, aspect, style
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aspect in the past tenses of French, German, and Swedish
  • 3.The retranslation hypothesis
  • 4.Material: Four translations of L’Étranger
  • 5.The empirical study
    • 5.1Tense
    • 5.2Verbal markers that are relevant to aspect
  • 6.Summary and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.35.08bla
References (22)
References
Berman, A. (1990). La retraduction comme espace de la traduction. Palimpsestes, 4, 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camus, A. (1942). L’Étranger. Paris: Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
(1946). Främlingen. Stockholm: Bonniers. Translated by S. Lindström.Google Scholar
(1948). Der Fremde. Bad Salzig: Rauch. Translated by G. Goyert and H. G. Brenner.Google Scholar
(1994). Der Fremde. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Translated by U. Aumüller.Google Scholar
(2009). Främlingen. Stockholm: Bonniers. Translated by J. Stolpe.Google Scholar
Chuquet, H. (2003). Loss and gain in English translations of the French imparfait In. S. Granger et al. (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies (pp. 105–122). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Englund Dimitrova, B. (2012). Nytt vin i gamla läglar? Att (ny)översätta dialekt. [New wine in old wineskins? (Re)translating dialect] In O. Eriksson (Ed.), Aspekter av litterär nyöversättning – Aspects de la retraduction litteraire [Aspects of literary retranslation] (pp. 101–115). Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, I. (2012). The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 168–182). London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Fischer, H. (2018). Präteritumschwund im Deutschen. Dokumentation und Erklärung eines Verdrängungsprozesses [Loss of the preterite in German. Documentation and explanation of a process of repression]. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gellin, F. (2014). Mersault eller Meursault? En komparativ studie av två översättningar av Albert Camus Främlingen. [ Meursault or Meaursault? A comparative study of two translations of Albert Camu’s The Stranger ] (BA Thesis). Uppsala University: Deparment of Nordic Languages. Available: [URL]
Henriksson H. (2015). Ist die perfekte Imperfektivität eine Illusion? Eine Pilotstudie zur Übersetzung des französischen Imparfait ins Deutsche und Schwedische. [Is the perfect imperfectivity an illusion? A pilot study about the translation of of the French imparfait into German and Swedish] In. M. P. Ängsal & F. T. Grub (Eds.). Visionen und Illusionen. Beiträge zur 11. Arbeitstagung schwedischer Germanistinnen und Germanisten. Text im Kontext in Göteborg am 4./5. April 2014. (pp. 151–166). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Nordeuropäische Arbeiten zur Literatur, Sprache und Kultur 3.Google Scholar
Henriksson, H. (2006). Aspektualität ohne Aspekt? Progressivität und Imperfektivität im Deutschen und Schwedischen. [Aspectuality without aspect? Progressivity and imperfectivity in German and Swedish] Lund: Lunder Germanistische Forschungen, 68.Google Scholar
Langenberg, J. (2008). Der Präteritumschwund in der deutschen Literatursprache. [The loss of the preterite in German literary language] Saarbrücken: VDM-Verlag.Google Scholar
Leiss, E. (1992). Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen. [The verbal categories of German] Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lonneman, B. (1998). Vergangenheitstempora in der Übersetzung Französisch – Deutsch am Beispiel ausgewählter Texte aus Albert Camus “L’Étranger”. [Past tenses in the translation French-German illustrated by a choice of texts in “L’Étranger” by Albert Camus]. Master’s Thesis. Universität Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Massardier-Kenney, F. (2015). Toward a Rethinking of Retranslation. Translation Review, 92(1), 73–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paloposki, O. & Koskinen, K. (2004). A thousand and one translations. Revisiting retranslation. In. G. Hansen, K. Malmkjaer & D. Gile (Eds.). Claims, changes and challenges in translation studies: selected contributions from the EST congress, Copenhagen 2001. (pp. 27–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1991). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Springer. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 43.Google Scholar
Tegelberg, E. (2014). La transmission de l’étrangéité : traduire et retraduire Camus en suédois. [The transfer of strangeness: translating and retranslating Camus into Swedish]. Traduire, 231, 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, G. (2012). The Nature and Role of Norms in Translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 162–167). London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar