Ahn, Hee-Don & Sungeun Cho
2023.
Exploring VP/vP Preposing in Multiple Nominative Constructions.
Lanaguage Research 59:2
► pp. 115 ff.
Alboiu, Gabriela & Virginia Hill
2016.
Evidentiality and Raising to Object as A′‐Movement: A Romanian Case Study.
Syntax 19:3
► pp. 256 ff.
Alhailawani, Mohammad
2021.
Against a uniform analysis of adnominal possessives in Jordanian Arabic: Evidence from nominal ellipsis.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:3
► pp. 359 ff.
Barker, Chris
2012.
Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command.
Linguistic Inquiry 43:4
► pp. 614 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2012.
Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning.
Linguistic Inquiry 43:3
► pp. 331 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
Introduction. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. 1 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
The roots of ditransitive verbs of caused possession. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. 107 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
Entailments of change in the roots of change-of-state verbs. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. 57 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
Manner/Result Complementarity and causation in verbal roots. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. 159 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020.
Conclusion. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. 213 ff.
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Dafna Palti & Yosef Grodzinsky
2004.
Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments.
NeuroImage 21:4
► pp. 1320 ff.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.
2018.
Ergative as Perfective Oblique.
Syntax 21:4
► pp. 321 ff.
Bleam, Tonia & Norbert Hornstein
2018.
Deriving Multiple “Object” Constructions. In
Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences,
► pp. 9 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2010.
Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives.
Linguistic Inquiry 41:2
► pp. 287 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2010.
Ditransitive Asymmetries and a Theory of Idiom Formation.
Linguistic Inquiry 41:4
► pp. 519 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2010.
Gillian Catriona Ramchand, Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Pp. x+217..
Journal of Linguistics 46:1
► pp. 260 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2018.
Depictive Secondary Predicates and Small Clause Approaches to Argument Structure.
Linguistic Inquiry 49:3
► pp. 537 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2018.
Double Object Constructions and Prepositional Dative Constructions Are Distinct: A Reply to Ormazabal and Romero 2012.
Linguistic Inquiry 49:1
► pp. 123 ff.
Burukina, Irina
2020.
Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Chang, Henry Y
2015.
Extractions in Tsou causative applicatives.
Lingua Sinica 1:1
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Laura J. Downing
2021.
Recursion and the Definition of Universal Prosodic Categories.
Languages 6:3
► pp. 125 ff.
Citko, Barbara
2011.
Small Clauses.
Language and Linguistics Compass 5:10
► pp. 748 ff.
Citko, Barbara, Joseph Embley Emonds & Rosemarie Whitney
2017.
Double Object Constructions. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Clemens, Lauren Eby & Maria Polinsky
2017.
Verb‐Initial Word Orders, Primarily in Austronesian and Mayan Languages. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Alina Tigău
Corr, Alice
2022.
Numeral Reduplication and Clausal Syntax: Grammaticalized Distributivity in Medieval Iberia.
Probus 34:2
► pp. 317 ff.
Dalmi, Gréte
2021.
The status of the oblique possessor in BE-possessives: Evidence from Russian and Hungarian.
Zeitschrift für Slawistik 66:4
► pp. 634 ff.
E. Schulz, Monika
2015.
Causer, recipient and possessor: the grammatical subject of get and the context-sensitivity of PHAVE.
Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :43
► pp. 77 ff.
Enghels, Renata & Kim Wylin
Etxepare, Ricardo & Bernard Oyharçabal
2009.
Bi datibo egitura ifar-ekialdeko zenbait hizkeratan.
Lapurdum :13
► pp. 145 ff.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader & Maather Alrawi
2023.
Arabic PPs in a Rooted Lexicon.
Languages 8:2
► pp. 95 ff.
Fernández-Alcalde, Héctor
2014.
Two types of datives in Spanish: Caused possession vs. possessor raising.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61:1
► pp. 69 ff.
Fernández-Alcalde, Héctor
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2007.
Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v.
Linguistic Inquiry 38:2
► pp. 197 ff.
Folli, Raffaella & Gillian Ramchand
2005.
Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: An Analysis from Event Decomposition. In
Perspectives on Aspect [
Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 32],
► pp. 81 ff.
Franco, Ludovico
2017.
L-syntax and phono-symbolism: on the status of ideophones in complexpredicates.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2
► pp. 243 ff.
Franco, Ludovico & Paolo Lorusso
2022.
Derivational Relators in Italian.
Languages 7:2
► pp. 130 ff.
Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo M. Savoia
GIRARD-GILLET, Geneviève
2012.
Linear Order and the Construction of Meaning: Is Syntax Deceptive?.
E-rea :9.2
Gonçalves, Rita
2015.
Romance languages do not have double objects: evidence from European Portuguese and Spanish.
Estudos de Lingüística Galega 7
Grudzińska, Justyna & Marek Zawadowski
2020.
A Scope-Taking System with Dependent Types and Continuations. In
Logic and Algorithms in Computational Linguistics 2018 (LACompLing2018) [
Studies in Computational Intelligence, 860],
► pp. 155 ff.
Haddican, Bill
2024.
Some implications of again‐modification for the syntax of English particle verb constructions.
Syntax
Haddican, Bill & Anders Holmberg
2019.
Object symmetry effects in Germanic.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:1
► pp. 91 ff.
Haddican, William
2010.
Theme–goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects.
Lingua 120:10
► pp. 2424 ff.
Hallman, Peter
2015.
Syntactic Neutralization in Double Object Constructions.
Linguistic Inquiry 46:3
► pp. 389 ff.
Hallman, Peter
2021.
Explaining Siewierska’s generalization.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 24:2
► pp. 145 ff.
Hallman, Peter & Rashid Al-Balushi
2022.
Pronominalization and clitic doubling in Syrian and Omani Arabic.
Linguistics 60:5
► pp. 1295 ff.
Harley, Heidi & Hyun Kyoung Jung
2015.
In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction.
Linguistic Inquiry 46:4
► pp. 703 ff.
Hartshorne, Joshua K., Timothy J. O’Donnell, Yasutada Sudo, Miki Uruwashi, Miseon Lee & Jesse Snedeker
2016.
Psych verbs, the linking problem, and the acquisition of language.
Cognition 157
► pp. 268 ff.
Harðarson, Gísli Rúnar
2016.
Peeling away the layers of the onion: on layers, inflection and domains in Icelandic compounds.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2015.
Ditransitive Constructions.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1
► pp. 19 ff.
Haugen, Jason D.
2009.
Hyponymous objects and Late Insertion.
Lingua 119:2
► pp. 242 ff.
Haïk, Isabelle
2011.
Kissing goodbye.
Corela :9-2
Hoeksema, Jack & Donna Jo Napoli
2019.
Degree Resultatives as Second-Order Constructions.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:3
► pp. 225 ff.
Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
2019.
Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical.
Linguistic Inquiry 50:4
► pp. 677 ff.
Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni
2019.
Idioms: The type-sensitive storage model
.
Linguistics 57:4
► pp. 853 ff.
Huang, C.-T. James & Jo-wang Lin
Johns, Alana
2007.
Restricting noun incorporation: root movement.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:3
► pp. 535 ff.
Kandybowicz, Jason & Mark C. Baker
2003.
On Directionality and the Structure of the Verb Phrase: Evidence from Nupe.
Syntax 6:2
► pp. 115 ff.
Karimi, Simin & Ryan Walter Smith
Kazanina, Nina, Sara Baker & Hayley Seddon
2020.
Actuality bias in verb learning: The case of sublexically modal transfer verbs.
Linguistics 58:5
► pp. 1413 ff.
Kholodova, Alina & Shanley E.M. Allen
Kim, Kyumin
2016.
A Unified analysis of existentials and psych‐constructions in Korean as pseudo‐transitives.
Studia Linguistica 70:2
► pp. 144 ff.
Kishimoto, Hideki
2008.
Ditransitive idioms and argument structure.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17:2
► pp. 141 ff.
Kiss, Katalin É.
2021.
What determines the varying relation of case and agreement? Evidence from the Ugric languages.
Acta Linguistica Academica 67:4
► pp. 397 ff.
Kratzer, Angelika & Elisabeth Selkirk
2020.
Deconstructing information structure.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Kuiper, Koenraad & Jacqui Nokes
2014.
The Minimalist Program. In
Theories of Syntax: Concepts and Case Studies,
► pp. 176 ff.
Lee, EunHee
2019.
Korean Syntax and Semantics,
Levin, Beth
2015.
Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1
► pp. 63 ff.
Levinson, Lisa
2011.
Possessive with in Germanic: have and the Role of P.
Syntax 14:4
► pp. 355 ff.
Lidz, Jeffrey & Annie Gagliardi
2015.
How Nature Meets Nurture: Universal Grammar and Statistical Learning.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1
► pp. 333 ff.
Lidz, Jeffrey & Laurel Perkins
LOHNDAL, TERJE
2011.
Freezing effects and objects.
Journal of Linguistics 47:1
► pp. 163 ff.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Andrei Sideltsev
2020.
On the Syntax of Argument Clitics in Hittite.
Transactions of the Philological Society 118:1
► pp. 29 ff.
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Jeriel Melgares
2021.
On (Un)Grammatical Clitic Sequences in Impersonal se Constructions. In
Unraveling the complexity of SE [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 99],
► pp. 87 ff.
MAKI, HIDEKI & D^|^Oacute;NALL P. ^|^Oacute; BAOILL
2008.
THE THEME GOAL CONSTRUCTION IN MODERN IRISH.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 25:2
► pp. 439 ff.
Mangialavori Rasia, Eugenia
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
2017.
Enclisis/Proclisis Alternations in Romance: Allomorphies and (Re)Ordering.
Transactions of the Philological Society 115:1
► pp. 98 ff.
MANZINI, MARIA RITA
2023.
Romance pronominal clitics as pure heads.
Journal of Linguistics 59:1
► pp. 89 ff.
McGinnis, Martha
2008.
Applicatives.
Language and Linguistics Compass 2:6
► pp. 1225 ff.
McGinnis, Martha
2017.
Applicatives. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero
2012.
PPs without Disguises: Reply to Bruening.
Linguistic Inquiry 43:3
► pp. 455 ff.
Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero
2013.
Differential Object Marking, Case and Agreement.
Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2:2
► pp. 221 ff.
Ortiz Ciscomani, Rosa María
Pineda, Anna
2020.
Double‐Object Constructions in Romance: The Common Denominator.
Syntax 23:3
► pp. 203 ff.
Punske, Jeffrey
2013.
Three forms of English verb particle constructions.
Lingua 135
► pp. 155 ff.
Rakhman, D. M.
2021.
Argument and Adjunct Purpose Constructions in Hill Mari.
NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 19:2
► pp. 19 ff.
Roos, Mikko
2011.
A Phase Extension Approach to Double Object Constructions – Evidence from Modern Greek*.
Studia Linguistica 65:2
► pp. 147 ff.
Roos, Mikko
2016.
External Arguments and Dative Cliticization: Evidence of Selective Spell‐out of Functional Heads.
Syntax 19:2
► pp. 192 ff.
SATO, YOSUKE
2003.
SEMANTIC REGULARITY IN THE ALTERNATION IN IDIOMS.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 20:2
► pp. 419 ff.
SATO, YOSUKE, NOBU GOTO & SHIN-ICHI KITADA
2018.
ON THE IN-SITU THEORY OF SLUICING IN ENGLISH: A NEW PERSPECTIVE FROM “IMMOBILE” ELEMENTS.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 35:1
► pp. 96 ff.
SHIOBARA, KAYONO
2011.
SIGNIFICANCE OF LINEAR INFORMATION IN PROSODICALLY CONSTRAINED SYNTAX.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:2
► pp. 258 ff.
Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr & Jim Wood
2012.
Case alternations in Icelandic ‘get’-passives.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35:3
► pp. 269 ff.
Smith, Ryan Walter & Jianrong Yu
2022.
Agentless presuppositions and the semantics of verbal roots.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:3
► pp. 875 ff.
Spathas, Giorgos & Dimitris Michelioudakis
2021.
States in the decomposition of verbal predicates.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39:4
► pp. 1253 ff.
Stanton, Juliet
2016.
Wholesale Late Merger in Ā-movement: Evidence from Preposition Stranding.
Linguistic Inquiry 47:1
► pp. 89 ff.
Stegovec, Adrian
2024.
The third way: object reordering as ambiguous labeling resolution.
The Linguistic Review 41:1
► pp. 187 ff.
Tigău, Alina & Klaus von Heusinger
Tsujioka, Takae
2011.
Idioms, mixed marking in nominalization, and the base-generation hypothesis for ditransitives in Japanese.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20:2
► pp. 117 ff.
Ussery, Cherlon & Hjalmar P. Petersen
Velnić, Marta & Merete Anderssen
2022.
The effect of givenness and referring expression on dative alternation in Norwegian: A reaction time study.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 45:1
► pp. 126 ff.
Wonbin Lee
2013.
Some Notes on Double Object Constructions in English.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 55:1
► pp. 255 ff.
Woolford, Ellen
2006.
Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure.
Linguistic Inquiry 37:1
► pp. 111 ff.
Wu, Hsiao‐hung Iris
2021.
Reverse Double Objects in Hakka Ditransitive*.
Studia Linguistica 75:3
► pp. 599 ff.
Xiang, Ming, Julian Grove & Jason Merchant
2019.
Structural priming in production through ‘silence’: An investigation of verb phrase ellipsis and null complement anaphora.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Yikiru, Peace & Bebwa Isingoma
2023.
The use of ditransitive constructions among L1 Lugbarati speakers of English in Uganda: A preliminary study.
Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 11:1
► pp. 33 ff.
Yuan, Boping & Yvonne Lin
2019.
Directionality and complexity of L1 transfer in L2 acquisition: Evidence from L2 Chinese discourse.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:4
► pp. 377 ff.
Zehentner, Eva, Melanie Röthlisberger & Timothy Colleman
Ziegler, Jayden & Jesse Snedeker
2019.
The use of syntax and information structure during language comprehension: Evidence from structural priming.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:3
► pp. 365 ff.
Ziegler, Jayden, Jesse Snedeker & Eva Wittenberg
2018.
Event Structures Drive Semantic Structural Priming, Not Thematic Roles: Evidence From Idioms and Light Verbs.
Cognitive Science 42:8
► pp. 2918 ff.
박한기
2015.
Ditransitive Verbs Converted from Monotransitive Verbs.
English21 28:2
► pp. 255 ff.
이제원
2015.
The Structure of Double Complement Construction and Syntactic Reflection of Logical Order between Internal Arguments.
Studies in Linguistics null:35
► pp. 247 ff.
황주현
2015.
Idioms in Korean Ditransitive Constructions.
Studies in Linguistics null:37
► pp. 429 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020.
Glossing conventions. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. xvii ff.
[no author supplied]
2020.
List of abbreviations. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. xv ff.
[no author supplied]
2020.
Copyright Page. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2020.
General preface. In
The Roots of Verbal Meaning,
► pp. ix ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.