Yes/no questions and the relation between tense and polarity in English and Finnish
Anders Holmberg | University of Durham and CASTL, University of Tromsø
It is argued that the structure of the sentence in English as well as Finnish is C [Pol [T...]], where Pol(arity) has negative or affirmative value. Yes/no questions are derived, universally, by movement of a wh-marked Pol to C, deriving an operator-variable relation between C and Pol. No category with interpretable features can intervene between C and Pol, as it would block the crucial relation between C and Pol. It is argued, with reference to Finnish, that we do not need to assume any head with uninterpretable features such as AgrS between C and Pol, either. For English, the theory is based on Zwicky & Pullum’s 1983 arguments that the negation -n’t in English is an inflection, combined with the analysis of inflected words as derived by head movement and incorporation of a lexical head in the inflectional head.
2009. A hybrid approach to Jespersen’s cycle in West Germanic. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 81 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 6 When Spading Met Swiping. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 68 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 2 Introduction. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 11 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 4 Theoretical Background: Splitting Up CP. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 29 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 1 Introduction. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 3 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 3 The Data. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 13 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 8 Expanding the Data Set. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 102 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 12 Theoretical Background. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 156 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 7 Previous Analyses. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 76 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 11 The Data. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 123 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 15 Conjugated ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ in SDR-Dialects. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 208 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 9 Conclusion and Theoretical Implications. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 112 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 10 Short Do Replies. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 121 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 13 The Analysis. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 172 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 16 Conclusion and Theoretical Implications. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 239 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 5 The Analysis. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 47 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2009. 17 General Conclusions. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 244 ff.
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2009. The Syntax of Ellipsis,
Nie, Da's & Da's Wel
2009. 14 Spelling Out the Proform. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 188 ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Preface. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Dedication. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. v ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Copyright Page. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Abbreviations and Formats Used in Examples and Glosses. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. xi ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.