Yes/no questions and the relation between tense and polarity in English and Finnish
Anders Holmberg | University of Durham and CASTL, University of Tromsø
It is argued that the structure of the sentence in English as well as Finnish is C [Pol [T...]], where Pol(arity) has negative or affirmative value. Yes/no questions are derived, universally, by movement of a wh-marked Pol to C, deriving an operator-variable relation between C and Pol. No category with interpretable features can intervene between C and Pol, as it would block the crucial relation between C and Pol. It is argued, with reference to Finnish, that we do not need to assume any head with uninterpretable features such as AgrS between C and Pol, either. For English, the theory is based on Zwicky & Pullum’s 1983 arguments that the negation -n’t in English is an inflection, combined with the analysis of inflected words as derived by head movement and incorporation of a lexical head in the inflectional head.
2009. 14 Spelling Out the Proform. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. 188 ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Preface. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Dedication. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. v ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Copyright Page. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Abbreviations and Formats Used in Examples and Glosses. In The Syntax of Ellipsis, ► pp. xi ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.