Article published in:Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2003
Edited by Pierre Pica
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3] 2003
► pp. 213–236
Two types of wh-adverbials
A typological study of how and why in Tsou
This paper presents cross-linguistic arguments for distinguishing between two types of wh-adverbials: causal how, causal why, and epistemic why pattern together in taking an IP scope, functioning as operators, whereas method how, manner how, and purpose why pattern together in taking a VP scope, functioning as predicates of underlying events. For the former group, there is always a cause-effect relation underpinning their syntactic distributions across languages, which is semantically realized as a causative predicate taking two events as its arguments, i.e., a cause event and an effect event. In a causal question, it is the cause event that is bound by the question operator; in a resultative question, the effect event is bound instead. For the latter group, they surface as conjuncts of main predicates in Tsou, which in turn argues for a neo-Davidsonian treatment of adjunct association in syntax (Parsons 1990). The fact that a conjunctive how can be construed as either a manner/method question or a resultative question in Tsou further argues for an independent semantic module in grammar in the vein of Culicover and Jackendoff (1997).
Keywords: Tsou, Austronesian syntax, wh-adverbials, neo-Davidsonian approach, wh-adjuncts, syntax–semantics interface
Published online: 08 December 2004
Cited by 2 other publications
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.