Article published In:
Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2005Edited by Pierre Pica, Johan Rooryck and Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5] 2005
► pp. 265–302
Edited by Pierre Pica, Johan Rooryck and Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5] 2005
► pp. 265–302
On productivity
Language learning is a remarkably robust process. The child is incredibly good at recognizing systematic regularities even when faced with lexically and contextually restricted exceptions This paper sketches out a preliminary model that recognizes productive processes and exceptions as such; accordingly, the learner can proceed to internalize each as different kinds of linguistic knowledge. We argue that if a linguistic process is conjectured to be productive, then having exceptions to it can add (surprisingly) significant cost to its online processing. Empirically, we explore these issues in the domain of morphology, which leads to finer-grained analyses of a number of well-known morphological problems. We also briefly discuss how the methodology and results of this work may generalize to syntactic learning.
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Adger, David
2017. Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:4 ► pp. 614 ff. 
Aronoff, Mark
2023. Three ways of looking at morphological rivalry. Word Structure 16:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Asimah, Vincent Kweku, Ratih Hurriyati, Vanessa Gaffar & Lili Adi Wibowo
2024. Can Productivity Increase? Sedentary Leisure Factors Among University Staff in Ghana. In Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2022) [Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 255], ► pp. 1916 ff.
Atlamaz, Ümit, Ömer Demirok & Metin Bağrıaçık
2023. Heritage grammars as checkpoints in acquisition: A Dependent Case Theoretic account. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1
BAILEY, GEORGE
2021. Insertion and deletion in Northern English (ng): Interacting innovations in the life cycle of phonological processes. Journal of Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 465 ff.
Boeckx, Cedric & Evelina Leivada
2014. On the particulars of Universal Grammar: implications for acquisition. Language Sciences 46 ► pp. 189 ff.
Cabrelli, Jennifer & Michael Iverson
2023. Why do learners overcome non-facilitative transfer faster from an L2 than an L1? The cumulative input threshold hypothesis. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff.
Colaiori, Francesca, Claudio Castellano, Christine F. Cuskley, Vittorio Loreto, Martina Pugliese & Francesca Tria
2015. General three-state model with biased population replacement: Analytical solution and application to language dynamics. Physical Review E 91:1
Culbertson, Jennifer & Kathryn Schuler
2019. Artificial Language Learning in Children. Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 353 ff.
Do, Youngah, Chiyuki Ito & Michael Kenstowicz
2014. Accent classes in South Kyengsang Korean: Lexical drift, novel words and loanwords. Lingua 148 ► pp. 147 ff.
Do, Youngah, Chiyuki Ito & Michael Kenstowicz
Dresher, B. Elan
2016. Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent. In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, ► pp. 231 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Aditi Lahiri
2022. Chapter 2. The foot in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 42 ff.
Fiorentino, Robert, Yuka Naito-Billen & Utako Minai
2016. Morphological Decomposition in Japanese De-adjectival Nominals: Masked and Overt Priming Evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:3 ► pp. 575 ff.
Gorman, Kyle & Charles Yang
2019. When Nobody Wins. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5], ► pp. 169 ff.
GRINSTEAD, JOHN, MORGAN DONNELLAN, JENNIFER BARAJAS & MARY JOHNSON
2014. Pronominal case and verbal finiteness contingencies in child English. Applied Psycholinguistics 35:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Herce, Borja
Koulaguina, Elena & Rushen Shi
2019. Rule Generalization from Inconsistent Input in Early Infancy. Language Acquisition 26:4 ► pp. 416 ff.
Lignos, Constantine & Charles Yang
2016. Morphology and Language Acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ► pp. 765 ff.
Mansfield, John
2021. The word as a unit of internal predictability. Linguistics 59:6 ► pp. 1427 ff.
Merkuur, Anne, Jan Don, Eric Hoekstra & Arjen P. Versloot
2019. Competition in Frisian Past Participles. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5], ► pp. 195 ff.
Morley, Rebecca L.
2015. Deletion or epenthesis? On the falsifiability of phonological universals. Lingua 154 ► pp. 1 ff.
Morley, Rebecca L.
2018. Is phonological consonant epenthesis possible? A series of artificial grammar learning experiments. Phonology 35:4 ► pp. 649 ff.
Nevins, Andrew
2015. Productivity and Portuguese morphology. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.
Nevins, Andrew, Cilene Rodrigues & Kevin Tang
2015. The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies. Probus 27:1
Newport, Elissa L.
2020. Children and Adults as Language Learners: Rules, Variation, and Maturational Change. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:1 ► pp. 153 ff.
Nowenstein, Iris Edda
2017. Determining the nature of intra-speaker subject case variation. In Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 1], ► pp. 91 ff.
Park-Johnson, Sunny K.
2019. Case Ellipsis: Acquisition of Variability by Young Heritage Speakers of Korean. International Multilingual Research Journal 13:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Pearl, Lisa & Jon Sprouse
2021. The acquisition of linking theories: A Tolerance and Sufficiency Principle approach to deriving UTAH and rUTAH. Language Acquisition 28:3 ► pp. 294 ff.
Yang, Charles & Silvina Montrul
2017. Learning datives: The Tolerance Principle in monolingual and bilingual acquisition. Second Language Research 33:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.