Article published in:
Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009General Editor: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9] 2009
► pp. 67–88
Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages
Elabbas Benmamoun | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Archna Bhatia | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky | Harvard University
We discuss the phenomenon of closest conjunct agreement with a special focus on head-final languages; we present data from two such languages, Hindi and Tsez, which allow agreement with the rightmost conjunct when the verb follows the conjoined phrase. This contrasts with head-initial languages, such as Arabic, where close conjunct agreement is with the leftmost conjunct in clauses with VS order. In addition, both languages exhibit certain flexibility of word order at root clause level; when the verb precedes the conjoined phrase, it can also agree with the leftmost conjunct. The empirical data from the two languages raise the following questions. First, is the typological difference between head-initial and head-final languages in the context of coordination due to a difference in the structure of coordination in these two groups? Second, to what extent is the syntactic configuration relevant to the computation of closest conjunct agreement? Third, what is the role of linear proximity in closest conjunct agreement? These questions have wider implications for the analysis of agreement and the relation between syntax and the morpho-phonological component.
Published online: 13 August 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.9.02ben
https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.9.02ben
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
No author info given
2020.
In The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity [Typological Studies in Language, 127],
Al Khalaf, Eman
2021. Furthest conjunct agreement in Jordanian Arabic.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
Arsenijević, Boban & Martina Gračanin-Yuksek
2016. Agreement and the structure of relative clauses.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1:1
Atlamaz, Ümit & Mark Baker
2018. On Partial Agreement and Oblique Case.
Syntax 21:3 ► pp. 195 ff.
Authier, Jean-Marc & Lisa A. Reed
2020.
In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 16],
► pp. 20 ff.
Baker, Mark & Livia Camargo Souza
2020. Agree without Agreement: Switch-reference and reflexive voice in two Panoan languages.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:4 ► pp. 1053 ff.
Benmamoun, Elabbas
2016.
In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVII [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 3],
► pp. 59 ff.
Benmamoun, Elabbas
2017.
In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Bhatt, Rajesh & Martin Walkow
2013. Locating agreement in grammar: an argument from agreement in conjunctions.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31:4 ► pp. 951 ff.
Bruening, Benjamin
2021. Generalizing the Presuppositional Approach to the Binding Conditions.
Syntax 24:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
Giusti, Giuliana, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro & Daniel Ross
2022.
In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274],
► pp. 2 ff.
Kaltsa, Maria, Ianthi M. Tsimpli, Theodoros Marinis & Melita Stavrou
2016. Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek.
Frontiers in Psychology 7
Keung, Lap-Ching & Adrian Staub
2018. Variable agreement with coordinate subjects is not a form of agreement attraction.
Journal of Memory and Language 103 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2019. Word order and closest-conjunct agreement in the Greek Septuagint: On the position of a biblical translation in the diachrony of a syntactic correlation.
Questions and Answers in Linguistics 5:2 ► pp. 37 ff.
Marušič, Franc, Andrew Ira Nevins & William Badecker
2015. The Grammars of Conjunction Agreement in Slovenian.
Syntax 18:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Marušič, Franc Lanko & Rok Žaucer
2016.
In Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 236],
► pp. 1 ff.
Nevins, Andrew & Philipp Weisser
2019. Closest Conjunct Agreement.
Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 219 ff.
Nuger, Justin
2016.
In Building Predicates [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 92],
► pp. 1 ff.
Ostrove, Jason
2018. Stretching, spanning, and linear adjacency in Vocabulary Insertion.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:4 ► pp. 1263 ff.
Rezac, Milan
2010.
In Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of Language [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 81],
► pp. 25 ff.
Karin Ryding & David Wilmsen
2021.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics,
SMITH, PETER W.
2017. The syntax of semantic agreement in English.
Journal of Linguistics 53:04 ► pp. 823 ff.
Soltan, Usama
2021.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics,
► pp. 371 ff.
Thorvaldsdóttir, Thorbjorg
2019. Agreement with conjoined singular noun phrases in Icelandic.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Turgay, Tacettin & Balkız Öztürk
2020.
In Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 215],
► pp. 156 ff.
Tyler, Matthew
2019. Choctaw as a Window into the Clitic/Agreement Split.
Studia Linguistica 73:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Weisser, Philipp
2020. On the Symmetry of Case in Conjunction.
Syntax 23:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Willer Gold, Jana, Boban Arsenijević, Mia Batinić, Michael Becker, Nermina Čordalija, Marijana Kresić, Nedžad Leko, Franc Lanko Marušič, Tanja Milićev, Nataša Milićević, Ivana Mitić, Anita Peti-Stantić, Branimir Stanković, Tina Šuligoj, Jelena Tušek & Andrew Nevins
2018. When linearity prevails over hierarchy in syntax.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115:3 ► pp. 495 ff.
É. Kiss, Katalin
2012. Patterns of agreement with coordinate noun phrases in Hungarian.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.