Article published in:Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009
General Editor: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
[Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9] 2009
► pp. 89–126
Arguments for successive-cyclic movement through SpecCP
Successive-cyclic A'–Cmovement derivations exploiting SpecCP as an intermediate landing-site deserve careful scrutiny. As a companion to Den Dikken’s (2009a) case for a typology of A'–Cdependencies that includes successive-cyclic movement via vP–edges, resumptive prolepsis, and scope marking, but not successive-cyclic movement via SpecCP, this paper demonstrates that the arguments accumulated in the generative literature in favour of successive-cyclic movement via SpecCP are invalid. To the extent that any of these arguments implicate SpecCP at all, they never make reference to SpecCP as an intermediate stopover point: they are arguments either for terminal movement to a subordinate SpecCP or for successive-cyclic movement via intermediate stopovers in positions other than SpecCP.
Published online: 13 August 2010
Cited by 16 other publications
Aelbrecht, Lobke & Marcel den Dikken
Bayer, Josef, Jana Häussler & Markus Bader
Mendes, Gesoel & Rodrigo Ranero
Szabolcsi, Anna & Terje Lohndal
van Urk, Coppe
van Urk, Coppe & Norvin Richards
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.