Cover not available
Article published In:
Gender, Sexuality & Linguistic Landscapes
Edited by Tommaso M. Milani
[Linguistic Landscape 4:3] 2018
► pp. 257–277

Linguistic landscapes as pornoheterotopias

(De)regulating gender and sexuality in the public toilet

| Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
| Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Drawing on multimodal analysis of graffiti in male public restrooms at the Faculdade de Letras of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, this paper investigates how notions of place and gendered/sexualized subjects are discursively (re)constructed in interactions with the materiality and historicity of the public realm. The analysis focuses on the indexicalities of public signage and the ways they (in)form understandings of and access to certain spaces. By investigating the fragmented history of entextualizations of these toilet graffiti as well as the indexicalities of their lexical, graphic, and co(n)textual aspects, we argue that places can be queered since they are semiotically constructed and discursively performed. The paper illustrates how static assumptions about place, gender, and sexuality can be disrupted and ressignified which highlights the pornoheterotopic character of these public restrooms in which semiotic processes that (de)regulate gender and sexual dissidence are emplaced.

Keywords: toilet graffiti, pornotopia, heterotopia, linguistic landscapes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The spatialization of gender and sexuality: Pornoheterotopias
  • 3.The mutually constitutive relations among public signage, subjects and spaces
  • 4.Contested spaces, contested identities: (De)regulating gender and sexuality in the public toilet
    • 4.1Challenging cisheteronormativity
    • 4.2Discourses in dispute
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18005.vas
References
Agha, A.
(2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barboza, R.
(2018) Sentidos e(m) movimento: a construção discursiva de espaços e identidades pelos grafitos de banheiro. 166f. Dissertação (Programa Interdisciplinar de Pós-graduação em Linguística Aplicada) – Faculdade de Letras, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Barrett, R.
(2017) From drag queens to leathermen: language, gender, and gay male subcultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, L., & Warner, M.
(1998) Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547–566. Retrieved on 10 April, from [URL]
Borba, R.
(2019) Injurious signs: The geopolitics of hate and hope in the linguistic landscape of a political crisis. In A. Peck, C. Stroud & Q. E. Williams (Eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes (pp. 161–181). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2005) Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browne, K.
(2004) Genderism and the bathroom problem: (Re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies. Gender, Place and Culture, 11(3), 331–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.
(1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay on phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, S.
(2011) Queering bathrooms: Gender, sexuality and the hygienic imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1970) The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
(1984) Des espaces autres [Of other spaces]. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 51, 46–49.Google Scholar
(2009) Le corps utopique, les hétérotopies [The utopian body, the heterotopias]. Nouvelles Éditions Lignes.Google Scholar
(2013) O corpo utópico, as heterotopias [The utopian body, the heterotopias]. São Paulo: n-1 Edições.Google Scholar
Milani, T.
(2014) Sexed signs – queering the scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2281, 201–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Sexual cityzenship: discourses, spaces and bodies at Joburg pride 2012. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 431–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miskolci, R.
(2017) Desejos digitais. Uma análise sociológica da busca por parceiros online [Digital desires. A sociological analysis of the search for online partners]. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar
Preciado, P. B.
(2010) Pornotopía: Arquitectura y sexualidad en “Playboy” durante la guerra fría [Pornotopia: architecture and sexuality in Playboy during the Cold War]. Madrid: Anagrama.Google Scholar
Rose, G.
(1999) Performing space. In D. Massey, J. Allen, P. Sarre (Eds.), Human Geography Today (pp. 247–259). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Santos, L.
(2012) Triste sina ser poeta de latrina: Um estudo antropológico/artístico dos grafitos de banheiro [What a doom to be a poet in a restroom: An anthropological / artistic study of restroom graffiti] (Master’s thesis, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil).Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.
(2013) Discourses in place: language in the material world. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K.
(1990) Epsitemology of the closet. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Souza, T.
(2012) Fazer banheirão: As dinâmicas das interações homoeróticas nos sanitários públicos da estação da Lapa e adjacências [Toilet cruising: The dynamics of homoerotic relations in public toilets of the Lapa bus station and its surroundings] (Master’s thesis. Federal University of Bahia, Brazil)Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G.
(1996) The natural history of discourse. In M. Silverstein, G. Urban (Eds.), Natural Histories of Discourse (p. 1–17). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, C.
(2016) Turbulent linguistic landscapes and the semiotics of citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and contesting identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sullivan, N.
(2003) A critical introduction to queer theory. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
VanderStouwe, C.
forthcoming). “Straight-ish”: Constrained Agency and the Linguistic Negotiation of Identity and Desire in Online Personal Advertisements among Men Seeking Men. Gender and Language.
Ward, J.
(2015) Not gay: Sex between straight white men. New York: NYU Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, M.
(2002) Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Motschenbacher, Heiko
2023. Affective regimes on Wilton Drive: a multimodal analysis. Social Semiotics 33:1 ► pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Panuelos, Rogelio P.
2023. Translanguaging in Transgressive Schoolscapes in the Philippines. In Translanguaging for Empowerment and Equity, ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Topacio, Katrina Ninfa M.
2023. Women in Signs. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:2 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Årman, Henning
2021. Order and turbulence in a Swedish bathroom. Gender and Language 15:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.