Article published in:
X-Scapes: New horizons in Linguistic Landscapes
Edited by Crispin Thurlow and Kellie Gonçalves
[Linguistic Landscape 5:2] 2019
► pp. 142–159

Regimes of voice and visibility in the refugeescape

A semiotic landscape approach

| University of Limerick
This paper proposes refugeescapes as a framework for expanding the focus of semiotic landscape studies by centering migration, inequality, and social exclusion. In so doing, the article adds to the work of Mpendukana and Stroud (2018) and Kerfoot and Hytlenstam (2017) in uncovering how place is structured by issues of affect, voice, and visibility. In my paper, I turn to a case study of the spatializing practices of refugees and asylum seekers in Ireland, and the ways they counteract the mainstream semiotic mediation of their experiences. In particular, I focus on the semiotic landscapes of transgressive intent where asylum seekers address mistreatment in their host country. By examining material produced by refugees and asylum seekers themselves, my paper demonstrates how enclosed spaces are a methodological venue for the field, while arguing also for a more thorough engagement with the theory and politics of visibility/voice.
Keywords: transgressive semiotic landscaping, refugeescape, voice, visibility, agency
Published online: 22 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19002.mor
References

References

Agamben, G.
1998 Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z.
2007 Liquid Times. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Blackwood, R.
2019 Language, images, and Paris Orly airport on Instagram: multilingual approaches to identity and self-representation on social media. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2010 The Sociolinguistics of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.
(2015) Notes toward a performative theory of assembly, vol. 1. Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M.
The rise of the networked society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chouliaraki, L.
2008 The mediation of suffering and the vision of a cosmopolitan public. Television & new media, 9(5): 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 The self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. Popular Culture, 15(2): 78–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, N.
2010 Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Diken, B.
2004 From refugee camp to gated community: bio politics and the end of the city. Citizenship studies, 8(1): 83–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elias, N.
2000 The civilising process. Oxford: UK Blackwell.Google Scholar
[ p. 157 ]
Fraser, N.
2010 Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1963 Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, K.
2019 YO! or OY? – say what? Creative place-making through a metrolingual artifact in Dumbo, Brooklyn. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(1): 42–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. & Gal, S.
2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation: In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities (pp. 35–79). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research.Google Scholar
Järlehed, J. & Moriarty, M.
2018 Culture and class in a glass: Scaling the semiofoodscape. Language and Communication, 62: 26–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A.
2018 The art of silence in upmarket spaces of commerce. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C.
2013 The (de-) centering spaces of airports: Framing mobility and multilingualism. In S. Pietikäinen, & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery (pp. 154–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Introducing semiotic landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language Image, Space (pp. 1–40). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Karlander, D.
2018 Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti. Social Semiotics, 28(1): 41–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerfoot, C. & Hytlenstam, K.
(Eds.) 2017 Entangled Discourses: South-North Orders of Visibility. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, M.
2016 Recontextualisations of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse and Society, 27(3): 308–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Discursive shifts in ethno-nationalist politics: On politicization and mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2): 76–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lou, J. J. & Jaworski, A.
2016 Itineraries of protest signage: Semiotic landscape and the mythologizing of the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5): 612–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loyal, S. & Quilley, S.
2016 Categories of state control: Asylum seekers and the direct provision and dispersal system in Ireland. Social Justice, 43(4).Google Scholar
Maguire, M. & Murphy, F.
2012 Boundaries of the state and politics of everyday life in Ireland. Anthropology News, 53(2): 6–7.Google Scholar
Malinowski, D.
2015 Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1): 95–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Rojo, L.
2014 Taking over the Square: The role of linguistic practices in contesting urban spaces. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4): 623–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milani, T.
2017 The politics of the margins: Multi-semiotic and affective strategies of voice and visibility. In C. Kerfoot & K. Hytlenstam (Eds.), Entangled Discourses: South-North Orders of Visibility (pp. 173–188). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milani, T. & Levon, E.
in press. Israel as homotopia: Language, space and vicious belonging. Language in Society.
Mirzoeff, N.
2011 The right to look. Critical Inquiry, 37(3): 473–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 158 ]
Moriarty, M.
2015 Indexing authenticity: The linguistic landscape of an Irish tourist town. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (232): 195–214.Google Scholar
Mpendukana, S. & Stroud, C.
2018 Of monkeys, shacks and loos: Changing times, changing places. In Peck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q. (Eds.), Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 183–200). London: Bloomsbury Books.Google Scholar
Nedelijkovic, V.
2018 ‘Reiterating asylum archive: Documenting DP in Ireland’ Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre Performance 23(2): 289–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, Z.
2018 Living liminality: everyday experiences of asylum seekers in the ‘direct provision’ system in Ireland. Gender, Place and Culture, 25(6): 821–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q.
(Eds.) 2018 Making sense of people and place. London: Bloomsbury Books.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
2009 Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In Shohamy & Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 342–352). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pugliese, J.
2009 Crisis heterotopias and border zones of the dead. Continuum, 23(5): 663–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, C. & Latorre, G.
2008 Chicana/o artivism: Judy Baca’s digital work with youth of color. In A. Everett (Ed.), Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media (pp. 81–108).Google Scholar
Sandvik, K. B.
2010 Unpacking world refugee day: Humanitarian governance and human rights practice? Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2: 287–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheller, M. & Urry, J.
2006 The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2): 207–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C.
2016 Turbulent linguistic landscapes and the semiotics of citizenship. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 3–18). London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C.
2019 Semiotic creativities in and with space: binaries and boundaries, beware! International Journal of Multilingualism, 16 (1): 94–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A.
2018 Word-things and thing-words: The transmodal production of privilege and status. In J. R. Cavanaugh & S. Shankar (eds), Language and materiality: Ethnographical and theoretical explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waksman, S. & Shohamy, E.
2016 Linguistic landscape of social protests: Moving from ‘open’ to ‘institutional’ spaces. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza. & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes (pp. 85–99). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Zetter, R.
2007 More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in the era of globalisation. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20 (2): 172–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 159 ]
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Yao, Xiaofang & Paul Gruba
2020. Power through the semiotic landscape. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Yochim, Ashley
2020. The changing landscape of unofficial signage in a U.S. refugee relocation city. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.